The MRI
2025–26 · Final

St. Francis (PA)

NEC · 7–24

Power-17.7#353 of 365
Résumé-13.60#717 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWagner (71–69)
Worst lossChicago State (75–80)
Schedule faced-7.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-14.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Oklahoma L 66–102 -34.3 -1.7
1 at TCU L 63–104 -33.4 -7.6
2 vs Mount St. Mary's L 66–74 -7.5 -0.5
3 at Lehigh L 62–79 -11.0 -6.0
4 N Belmont L 57–94 -28.0 -9.0
4 N Troy L 64–74 -21.3 +11.3
4 vs Franciscan University non-D1 W 85–60 +22.9 +2.1
5 at Xavier L 74–96 -27.2 +5.2
5 vs Penn State-Shenango non-D1 W 100–41 +22.9 +36.1
5 at Radford L 56–89 -16.1 -16.9
6 at Temple L 67–95 -20.5 -7.5
7 at Florida L 61–102 -49.5 +8.5
7 vs Robert Morris L 70–79 -16.4 +7.4
9 vs Le Moyne L 58–84 -4.3 -21.7
9 vs Fairleigh Dickinson W 85–82 -1.6 +4.6
10 at Wagner W 71–69 -9.7 +11.7
10 at Long Island University L 63–67 -16.3 +12.3
11 vs Central Connecticut L 90–98 -7.2 -0.8
12 vs Stonehill W 63–61 -1.7 +3.7
12 vs Chicago State W 81–60 +2.6 +18.4
13 vs New Haven L 69–81 -0.8 -11.2
14 at Mercyhurst L 89–98 -11.5 +2.5
14 at Le Moyne L 84–86 -9.7 +7.7
15 at Chicago State L 75–80 -2.9 -2.1
15 at Fairleigh Dickinson L 59–66 -7.1 +0.1
15 vs Mercyhurst L 79–94 -6.1 -8.9
16 vs Long Island University L 89–91 -10.8 +8.8
16 vs Wagner L 56–65 -4.3 -4.7
17 at New Haven W 73–67 -6.2 +12.2
17 at Stonehill L 77–103 -7.1 -18.9
17 at Central Connecticut L 64–69 -12.6 +7.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 at New Haven -6.2 29%

Season by season

Best finish: #108 in 2019–20. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #237 of 326 (15-12)2005–06: #321 of 326 (4-24)2006–07: #290 of 326 (8-21)2007–08: #306 of 328 (6-23)2008–09: #315 of 330 (6-23)2009–10: #312 of 335 (11-19)2010–11: #306 of 346 (9-21)2011–12: #323 of 345 (6-23)2012–13: #328 of 347 (5-24)2013–14: #331 of 351 (10-21)2014–15: #220 of 351 (16-16)2015–16: #246 of 351 (13-17)2016–17: #246 of 351 (17-17)2017–18: #177 of 351 (18-13)2018–19: #194 of 353 (16-15)2019–20: #108 of 353 (21-10)2020–21: #268 of 347 (6-16)2021–22: #308 of 358 (9-21)2022–23: #326 of 363 (13-18)2023–24: #353 of 362 (8-22)2024–25: #311 of 364 (16-18)2025–26: #353 of 365 (7-24) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 353 of 365 7–24 -17.67 Power
2024–25 311 of 364 16–18 -10.52 Power
2023–24 353 of 362 8–22 -16.96 Power
2022–23 326 of 363 13–18 -11.04 Power
2021–22 308 of 358 9–21 -10.71 Power
2020–21 268 of 347 6–16 -6.86 Power
2019–20 108 of 353 21–10 62.82 MRI
2018–19 194 of 353 16–15 21.29 MRI
2017–18 177 of 351 18–13 35.91 MRI
2016–17 246 of 351 17–17 3.89 MRI
2015–16 246 of 351 13–17 -1.30 MRI
2014–15 220 of 351 16–16 16.60 MRI
2013–14 331 of 351 10–21 -56.59 MRI
2012–13 328 of 347 5–24 -66.01 MRI
2011–12 323 of 345 6–23 -56.30 MRI
2010–11 306 of 346 9–21 -33.68 MRI
2009–10 312 of 335 11–19 -48.88 MRI
2008–09 315 of 330 6–23 -60.94 MRI
2007–08 306 of 328 6–23 -42.31 MRI
2006–07 290 of 326 8–21 -31.70 MRI
2005–06 321 of 326 4–24 -77.72 MRI
2004–05 237 of 326 15–12 2.01 MRI