The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Lamar

Southland · 12–19

Power-5.2#240 of 365
Résumé-7.85#660 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winMontana (68–63)
Worst lossHouston Christian (53–75)
Schedule faced-6.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-12.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Texas A&M-San Antonio non-D1 W 93–53 +35.4 +4.6
2 at TCU L 65–78 -20.9 +7.9
3 at UL Monroe W 79–66 +10.8 +2.2
3 at Montana W 68–63 -5.9 +10.9
4 N Oakland L 68–83 -5.5 -9.5
4 vs Our Lady Of The Lake non-D1 W 90–46 +35.4 +8.6
5 vs Louisiana W 65–55 +9.5 +0.5
5 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi L 49–57 -0.6 -7.4
6 at San Diego State L 71–89 -21.7 +3.7
7 vs UT Rio Grande Valley L 72–83 -2.6 -8.4
7 vs Omaha L 82–85 +3.0 -6.0
9 at Northwestern State W 76–61 +2.6 +12.4
9 at East Texas A&M W 69–62 +4.6 +2.4
9 at McNeese L 70–82 -17.9 +5.9
10 at SE Louisiana L 52–60 +1.6 -9.6
10 vs Incarnate Word W 63–51 +5.0 +7.0
11 vs Houston Christian W 64–56 +9.8 -1.8
11 at Nicholls W 90–80 -1.3 +11.3
12 at New Orleans L 76–89 -1.2 -11.8
12 vs Stephen F. Austin L 81–88 -7.0 -0.0
13 vs East Texas A&M W 82–61 +10.0 +11.0
13 vs McNeese L 63–64 -12.4 +11.4
14 vs SE Louisiana W 73–54 +7.1 +11.9
14 at Stephen F. Austin L 74–84 -12.4 +2.4
15 vs Northwestern State L 68–70 +8.1 -10.1
15 at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi L 63–76 -6.1 -6.9
16 at UT Rio Grande Valley L 65–70 -8.1 +3.1
16 vs New Orleans L 71–77 +4.2 -10.2
17 vs Nicholls L 52–53 +4.2 -5.2
17 at Incarnate Word L 60–72 -0.5 -11.5
18 at Houston Christian L 53–75 +4.3 -26.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
13 vs East Texas A&M +10.0 82%

Season by season

Best finish: #47 in 2011–12. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #124 of 326 (18-11)2005–06: #177 of 326 (17-14)2006–07: #219 of 326 (15-17)2007–08: #108 of 328 (19-11)2008–09: #185 of 330 (15-15)2009–10: #251 of 335 (14-18)2010–11: #172 of 346 (13-17)2011–12: #47 of 345 (23-12)2012–13: #346 of 347 (3-28)2013–14: #339 of 351 (4-26)2014–15: #203 of 351 (15-15)2015–16: #258 of 351 (11-19)2016–17: #170 of 351 (19-15)2017–18: #132 of 351 (19-14)2018–19: #155 of 353 (16-13)2019–20: #212 of 353 (14-15)2020–21: #275 of 347 (10-18)2021–22: #343 of 358 (2-27)2022–23: #355 of 363 (9-22)2023–24: #250 of 362 (19-14)2024–25: #195 of 364 (20-13)2025–26: #240 of 365 (12-19) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 240 of 365 12–19 -5.24 Power
2024–25 195 of 364 20–13 -1.73 Power
2023–24 250 of 362 19–14 -5.17 Power
2022–23 355 of 363 9–22 -17.15 Power
2021–22 343 of 358 2–27 -14.75 Power
2020–21 275 of 347 10–18 -7.44 Power
2019–20 212 of 353 14–15 14.01 MRI
2018–19 155 of 353 16–13 37.85 MRI
2017–18 132 of 351 19–14 55.32 MRI
2016–17 170 of 351 19–15 38.58 MRI
2015–16 258 of 351 11–19 -8.53 MRI
2014–15 203 of 351 15–15 22.66 MRI
2013–14 339 of 351 4–26 -70.47 MRI
2012–13 346 of 347 3–28 -126.31 MRI
2011–12 47 of 345 23–12 105.54 MRI
2010–11 172 of 346 13–17 33.90 MRI
2009–10 251 of 335 14–18 -1.04 MRI
2008–09 185 of 330 15–15 26.96 MRI
2007–08 108 of 328 19–11 66.88 MRI
2006–07 219 of 326 15–17 7.54 MRI
2005–06 177 of 326 17–14 29.19 MRI
2004–05 124 of 326 18–11 49.54 MRI