The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Lamar

Southland · 2–1

Power-5.0#222 of 365
Résumé-0.71#407 · wins above average
Movement+24up from #246 last week
Best winSchreiner (124–62)
Worst lossAbilene Christian (81–83)
Schedule faced-25.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-7.3 avg opponent
Returning production0% of last season's win shares · #335 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production5.4 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+29.7 avg× 27%+8.1
Opponents faced-25.5 avg× 27%-7.0
Preseason prior-8.5× 73%-6.1
Power-5.0

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Schreiner non-D1 W 124–62 +31.1 +30.9 +0.5
2 at Abilene Christian L 81–83 +2.8 -4.8 -0.5
3 vs Centenary (LA) non-D1 W 122–57 +31.1 +33.9 +1.1
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-6.1
Power-5.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
4 at Omaha +2.9 60%
4 N Rice +2.7 60%
5 N Robert Morris -1.7 44%

Season by season

Best finish: #47 in 2011–12. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #124 of 326 (18-11)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #177 of 326 (17-14)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #219 of 326 (15-17)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #108 of 328 (19-11)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #185 of 330 (15-15)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #251 of 335 (14-18)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #172 of 346 (13-17)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #47 of 345 (23-12)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #346 of 347 (3-28)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #339 of 351 (4-26)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #203 of 351 (15-15)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #258 of 351 (11-19)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #170 of 351 (19-15)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #132 of 351 (19-14)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #155 of 353 (16-13)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #212 of 353 (14-15)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #274 of 347 (10-18)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #342 of 358 (2-27)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #357 of 363 (9-22)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #243 of 362 (19-14)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #191 of 364 (20-13)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #239 of 365 (12-19) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 12–19 #239 of 365 · -5.58 –
2024–25 20–13 #191 of 364 · -1.80 –
2023–24 19–14 #243 of 362 · -5.02 –
2022–23 9–22 #357 of 363 · -17.83 –
2021–22 2–27 #342 of 358 · -15.05 –
2020–21 10–18 #274 of 347 · -7.97 –
2019–20 14–15 – #212 of 353 · 14.01
2018–19 16–13 – #155 of 353 · 37.85
2017–18 19–14 – #132 of 351 · 55.32
2016–17 19–15 – #170 of 351 · 38.58
2015–16 11–19 – #258 of 351 · -8.53
2014–15 15–15 – #203 of 351 · 22.66
2013–14 4–26 – #339 of 351 · -70.47
2012–13 3–28 – #346 of 347 · -126.31
2011–12 23–12 – #47 of 345 · 105.54
2010–11 13–17 – #172 of 346 · 33.90
2009–10 14–18 – #251 of 335 · -1.04
2008–09 15–15 – #185 of 330 · 26.96
2007–08 19–11 – #108 of 328 · 66.88
2006–07 15–17 – #219 of 326 · 7.54
2005–06 17–14 – #177 of 326 · 29.19
2004–05 18–11 – #124 of 326 · 49.54