The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Abilene Christian

UAC · 14–19

Power-6.3#257 of 365
Résumé-5.06#612 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUtah Valley (85–68)
Worst lossSouthern Utah (52–74)
Schedule faced-4.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-5.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs McMurry non-D1 W 92–55 +34.3 +2.7
1 vs Omaha W 73–71 +1.9 +0.1
2 vs Southwestern Adventist non-D1 W 104–63 +34.3 +6.7
2 at Stephen F. Austin L 66–76 -13.5 +3.5
3 at Texas State L 49–63 -4.6 -9.4
4 N UTSA W 61–50 +8.3 +2.7
4 N William & Mary L 58–92 -7.2 -26.8
4 vs Jarvis Christian non-D1 W 87–55 +34.3 -2.3
5 at Pepperdine W 71–63 +0.9 +7.1
5 vs New Mexico State W 77–69 -3.2 +11.2
7 at Arizona L 62–96 -40.4 +6.4
7 at BYU L 67–85 -28.3 +10.3
8 at Texas Southern W 75–68 +2.6 +4.4
9 vs Utah Tech L 64–79 +0.5 -15.5
9 vs Utah Valley W 85–68 -11.0 +28.0
10 at Tarleton State W 84–80 -4.1 +8.1
10 at UT Arlington L 72–82 -8.5 -1.5
11 vs California Baptist L 58–74 -7.3 -8.7
11 at Southern Utah L 52–74 -0.7 -21.3
13 vs Utah Tech L 70–76 +0.5 -6.5
13 vs Southern Utah L 76–79 +4.8 -7.8
14 at Utah Valley L 55–68 -16.4 +3.4
14 at California Baptist L 63–65 -12.8 +10.8
15 vs UT Arlington W 67–63 -3.0 +7.0
15 vs Tarleton State W 73–59 +1.4 +12.6
16 at Tarleton State L 62–65 -4.1 +1.1
16 vs Southern Utah W 87–83 +4.8 -0.8
17 at Utah Tech L 81–85 -5.0 +1.0
17 at Utah Valley L 67–74 -16.4 +9.4
18 at California Baptist L 48–87 -12.8 -26.2
18 vs UT Arlington L 57–64 -3.0 -4.0
19 N Tarleton State W 84–78 -1.3 +7.3
19 N Utah Tech L 74–80 -2.3 -3.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
13 at Tarleton State -4.1 36%

Season by season

Best finish: #35 in 2020–21. 14 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2006–07: #294 of 326 (0-1)2013–14: #315 of 351 (11-20)2014–15: #330 of 351 (10-21)2015–16: #280 of 351 (13-18)2016–17: #266 of 351 (13-16)2017–18: #220 of 351 (16-16)2018–19: #82 of 353 (23-7)2019–20: #127 of 353 (16-11)2020–21: #35 of 347 (24-5)2021–22: #90 of 358 (25-11)2022–23: #160 of 363 (13-17)2023–24: #197 of 362 (16-18)2024–25: #214 of 364 (16-16)2025–26: #257 of 365 (14-19) 2006–07 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 257 of 365 14–19 -6.34 Power
2024–25 214 of 364 16–16 -3.32 Power
2023–24 197 of 362 16–18 -2.31 Power
2022–23 160 of 363 13–17 0.51 Power
2021–22 90 of 358 25–11 6.39 Power
2020–21 35 of 347 24–5 11.36 Power
2019–20 127 of 353 16–11 50.95 MRI
2018–19 82 of 353 23–7 70.87 MRI
2017–18 220 of 351 16–16 16.79 MRI
2016–17 266 of 351 13–16 -6.70 MRI
2015–16 280 of 351 13–18 -17.20 MRI
2014–15 330 of 351 10–21 -49.09 MRI
2013–14 315 of 351 11–20 -37.69 MRI
2006–07 294 of 326 0–1 -33.87 MRI