The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

McNeese

Southland · 2–1

Power+6.6#98 of 365
Résumé+0.17#155 · wins above average
Movement-2down from #96 last week
Best winUAB (99–78)
Worst lossNorth Texas (67–77)
Schedule faced-11.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-5.2 avg opponent
Returning production32% of last season's win shares · #104 of 364
Incoming production1.3 win shares from other schools' players
Recruiting class#130 in the country

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+20.3 avg× 27%+5.5
Opponents faced-11.7 avg× 27%-3.2
Preseason prior+5.8× 73%+4.3
Power+6.6

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 N UAB W 99–78 +7.3 +13.7 +2.6
2 at North Texas L 67–77 -0.3 -9.7 -0.3
3 vs College Of Biblical Studies non-D1 W 135–87 +42.7 +5.3 +0.0
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)+4.3
Power+6.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
4 at Texas State +1.2 55%
5 at Louisiana +16.5 93%

Season by season

Best finish: #62 in 2024–25. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #204 of 326 (13-15)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #184 of 326 (14-14)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #240 of 326 (15-17)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #214 of 328 (13-16)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #217 of 330 (11-18)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #272 of 335 (10-20)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #146 of 346 (21-12)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #180 of 345 (17-15)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #276 of 347 (11-17)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #294 of 351 (11-20)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #240 of 351 (15-16)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #313 of 351 (9-20)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #322 of 351 (7-22)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #280 of 351 (11-17)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #324 of 353 (6-21)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #276 of 353 (11-17)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #266 of 347 (10-14)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #298 of 358 (11-22)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #336 of 363 (11-23)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 362 (30-4)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 364 (28-7)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 365 (28-6) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 28–6 #74 of 365 · 9.28 –
2024–25 28–7 #62 of 364 · 10.54 –
2023–24 30–4 #91 of 362 · 6.95 –
2022–23 11–23 #336 of 363 · -12.68 –
2021–22 11–22 #298 of 358 · -9.37 –
2020–21 10–14 #266 of 347 · -7.17 –
2019–20 11–17 – #276 of 353 · -13.22
2018–19 6–21 – #324 of 353 · -47.15
2017–18 11–17 – #280 of 351 · -13.18
2016–17 7–22 – #322 of 351 · -43.67
2015–16 9–20 – #313 of 351 · -34.88
2014–15 15–16 – #240 of 351 · 6.31
2013–14 11–20 – #294 of 351 · -22.51
2012–13 11–17 – #276 of 347 · -22.14
2011–12 17–15 – #180 of 345 · 31.07
2010–11 21–12 – #146 of 346 · 45.29
2009–10 10–20 – #272 of 335 · -12.88
2008–09 11–18 – #217 of 330 · 10.40
2007–08 13–16 – #214 of 328 · 8.98
2006–07 15–17 – #240 of 326 · -3.25
2005–06 14–14 – #184 of 326 · 27.49
2004–05 13–15 – #204 of 326 · 17.69