The MRI
2025–26 · Final

North Texas

American · 19–14

Power+3.2#127 of 365
Résumé+1.80#134 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTulsa (72–67)
Worst lossEast Carolina (59–63)
Schedule faced-1.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs New Mexico Highlands non-D1 W 88–54 +43.9 -9.9
1 vs Northwestern State W 80–53 +16.6 +10.4
1 N Loyola Chicago W 64–62 +10.9 -8.9
2 at Oregon State L 64–66 +1.0 -3.0
2 at Saint Mary's L 49–80 -18.3 -12.7
3 vs Central Arkansas W 74–56 +7.8 +10.2
4 vs Eastern Washington W 79–71 +9.4 -1.4
4 vs Prairie View A&M W 72–69 +17.0 -14.0
5 vs Houston Christian W 77–75 +18.2 -16.2
5 vs TCU L 55–65 -7.0 -3.0
6 at South Alabama W 58–57 +0.4 +0.6
7 at Santa Clara L 60–63 -14.7 +11.7
8 vs Science & Arts (OK) non-D1 W 109–56 +43.9 +9.1
9 at Memphis L 48–57 -3.4 -5.6
9 vs Tulsa W 72–67 -3.5 +8.5
10 vs South Florida L 70–74 -6.6 +2.6
10 at Wichita State L 67–78 -8.1 -2.9
11 at Tulane W 71–63 +4.2 +3.8
12 vs UTSA W 81–62 +20.7 -1.7
12 vs East Carolina L 59–63 +13.4 -17.4
13 at Tulsa L 66–82 -9.0 -7.0
13 vs UAB L 68–72 +1.6 -5.7
14 at Rice L 83–86 +5.8 -8.8
14 at UTSA W 81–58 +15.2 +7.8
15 vs Memphis W 76–69 +2.0 +5.0
15 at Temple W 65–62 +0.4 +2.6
16 vs Tulane L 71–77 +9.7 -15.7
16 vs Florida Atlantic W 73–72 +1.8 -0.8
17 at Charlotte L 79–80 +3.4 -4.4
17 at UAB W 62–58 -3.8 +7.8
18 vs Rice W 62–58 +11.2 -7.2
19 N Florida Atlantic W 74–70 -0.9 +4.9
19 N Tulsa L 84–90 -6.3 +0.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #37 in 2021–22. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #191 of 326 (14-14)2005–06: #164 of 326 (14-14)2006–07: #97 of 326 (23-11)2007–08: #86 of 328 (20-11)2008–09: #129 of 330 (20-12)2009–10: #122 of 335 (24-9)2010–11: #112 of 346 (22-11)2011–12: #153 of 345 (18-14)2012–13: #242 of 347 (11-19)2013–14: #205 of 351 (16-16)2014–15: #247 of 351 (14-17)2015–16: #288 of 351 (12-20)2016–17: #323 of 351 (8-22)2017–18: #129 of 351 (20-18)2018–19: #116 of 353 (18-12)2019–20: #82 of 353 (18-11)2020–21: #51 of 347 (18-10)2021–22: #37 of 358 (25-7)2022–23: #39 of 363 (31-7)2023–24: #70 of 362 (19-15)2024–25: #71 of 364 (27-9)2025–26: #127 of 365 (19-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 127 of 365 19–14 3.25 Power
2024–25 71 of 364 27–9 8.98 Power
2023–24 70 of 362 19–15 8.90 Power
2022–23 39 of 363 31–7 12.32 Power
2021–22 37 of 358 25–7 11.53 Power
2020–21 51 of 347 18–10 9.73 Power
2019–20 82 of 353 18–11 77.21 MRI
2018–19 116 of 353 18–12 58.28 MRI
2017–18 129 of 351 20–18 58.46 MRI
2016–17 323 of 351 8–22 -44.07 MRI
2015–16 288 of 351 12–20 -20.68 MRI
2014–15 247 of 351 14–17 4.10 MRI
2013–14 205 of 351 16–16 23.36 MRI
2012–13 242 of 347 11–19 -2.68 MRI
2011–12 153 of 345 18–14 44.66 MRI
2010–11 112 of 346 22–11 63.65 MRI
2009–10 122 of 335 24–9 56.56 MRI
2008–09 129 of 330 20–12 50.13 MRI
2007–08 86 of 328 20–11 74.62 MRI
2006–07 97 of 326 23–11 67.97 MRI
2005–06 164 of 326 14–14 33.22 MRI
2004–05 191 of 326 14–14 21.41 MRI