The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Nebraska

Big Ten · 28–7

Power+21.0#18 of 365
Résumé+18.04#16 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIllinois (83–80)
Worst lossUCLA (52–72)
Schedule faced+10.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs West Georgia W 86–53 +35.5 -2.5
1 vs Florida International W 96–66 +26.4 +3.6
2 vs Maryland Eastern Shore W 69–50 +39.2 -20.2
2 N Oklahoma W 105–99 +7.1 -1.1
3 N New Mexico W 84–72 +5.9 +6.1
3 N Kansas State W 86–85 +16.0 -15.0
4 vs Winthrop W 80–73 +20.7 -13.7
4 vs South Carolina Upstate W 72–63 +33.2 -24.2
5 vs Creighton W 71–50 +14.3 +6.7
6 vs Wisconsin W 90–60 +4.2 +25.8
6 at Illinois W 83–80 -8.4 +11.4
8 vs North Dakota W 78–55 +30.9 -7.9
9 vs New Hampshire W 86–55 +38.3 -7.3
9 vs Michigan State W 58–56 -0.7 +2.7
10 at Ohio State W 72–69 +0.7 +2.3
10 at Indiana W 83–77 +4.0 +2.0
11 vs Oregon W 90–55 +16.5 +18.5
11 at Northwestern W 77–58 +7.9 +11.1
12 vs Washington W 76–66 +12.9 -2.9
12 at Minnesota W 76–57 +11.2 +7.8
13 at Michigan L 72–75 -14.4 +11.4
13 vs Illinois L 69–78 -2.9 -6.1
14 at Rutgers W 80–68 +15.5 -3.5
15 vs Purdue L 77–80 -1.9 -1.1
15 vs Northwestern W 68–49 +13.3 +5.7
16 at Iowa L 52–57 +0.5 -5.5
16 vs Penn State W 87–64 +21.2 +1.8
17 vs Maryland W 74–61 +18.4 -5.4
17 at USC W 82–67 +9.5 +5.5
18 at UCLA L 52–72 +1.2 -21.2
18 vs Iowa W 84–75 +5.9 +3.1
19 N Purdue L 58–74 -4.6 -11.4
20 N Troy W 76–47 +17.4 +11.6
20 N Vanderbilt W 74–72 -0.6 +2.6
21 N Iowa L 71–77 +3.2 -9.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #18 in 2025–26. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #82 of 326 (14-14)2005–06: #110 of 326 (19-14)2006–07: #99 of 326 (17-14)2007–08: #59 of 328 (20-13)2008–09: #88 of 330 (18-13)2009–10: #130 of 335 (15-18)2010–11: #65 of 346 (19-13)2011–12: #204 of 345 (12-18)2012–13: #207 of 347 (15-18)2013–14: #100 of 351 (19-13)2014–15: #199 of 351 (13-18)2015–16: #127 of 351 (16-18)2016–17: #197 of 351 (12-19)2017–18: #90 of 351 (22-11)2018–19: #90 of 353 (18-17)2019–20: #307 of 353 (7-25)2020–21: #182 of 347 (7-20)2021–22: #183 of 358 (10-22)2022–23: #121 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #47 of 362 (23-11)2024–25: #52 of 364 (20-15)2025–26: #18 of 365 (28-7) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 18 of 365 28–7 20.97 Power
2024–25 52 of 364 20–15 12.12 Power
2023–24 47 of 362 23–11 12.06 Power
2022–23 121 of 363 16–16 3.61 Power
2021–22 183 of 358 10–22 -0.48 Power
2020–21 182 of 347 7–20 -1.17 Power
2019–20 307 of 353 7–25 -34.90 MRI
2018–19 90 of 353 18–17 67.87 MRI
2017–18 90 of 351 22–11 79.39 MRI
2016–17 197 of 351 12–19 29.91 MRI
2015–16 127 of 351 16–18 58.88 MRI
2014–15 199 of 351 13–18 24.87 MRI
2013–14 100 of 351 19–13 68.96 MRI
2012–13 207 of 347 15–18 13.93 MRI
2011–12 204 of 345 12–18 19.17 MRI
2010–11 65 of 346 19–13 89.46 MRI
2009–10 130 of 335 15–18 52.86 MRI
2008–09 88 of 330 18–13 75.37 MRI
2007–08 59 of 328 20–13 96.94 MRI
2006–07 99 of 326 17–14 66.95 MRI
2005–06 110 of 326 19–14 58.02 MRI
2004–05 82 of 326 14–14 72.18 MRI