The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Pacific

WCC · 18–15

Power+0.3#160 of 365
Résumé+1.01#144 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSeattle U (56–54)
Worst lossSan Diego (54–66)
Schedule faced-1.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Life Pacific non-D1 W 83–56 +40.9 -13.9
1 at Nevada L 77–78 -12.1 +11.1
2 vs Long Beach State W 69–66 +11.4 -8.4
2 at Cal State Fullerton W 85–73 +2.1 +9.9
3 at Florida Atlantic L 59–82 -6.6 -16.4
4 N Stony Brook W 86–58 +7.0 +21.0
4 N Jacksonville W 68–53 +8.9 +6.1
4 vs Sacramento State W 68–54 +13.4 +0.6
5 at Air Force W 80–65 +15.8 -0.8
5 at California L 61–67 -9.5 +3.5
6 vs Simpson University (CA) non-D1 W 104–50 +40.9 +13.1
7 at BYU L 57–93 -21.7 -14.3
8 vs Nicholls W 95–82 +9.7 +3.3
8 at San Diego L 54–66 +5.8 -17.8
9 at Loyola Marymount L 71–80 -1.7 -7.3
9 vs Oregon State W 84–53 +3.5 +27.5
10 vs Pepperdine W 74–69 +12.9 -7.9
10 at Portland L 89–90 +3.8 -4.8
10 vs San Diego W 77–70 +11.3 -4.3
11 at Santa Clara L 69–85 -17.6 +1.6
11 at Oregon State W 81–64 -2.0 +19.0
12 vs Seattle U W 56–54 -1.1 +3.1
13 vs Portland W 74–51 +9.2 +13.8
13 at San Francisco L 82–87 -6.5 +1.5
14 vs Santa Clara L 56–71 -12.2 -2.8
14 at Pepperdine W 92–59 +7.5 +25.5
15 vs Loyola Marymount W 65–59 +3.8 +2.2
15 vs Saint Mary's L 61–72 -15.8 +4.8
16 at Washington State L 70–87 -3.6 -13.4
16 at Gonzaga L 62–71 -27.2 +18.2
17 vs San Francisco L 61–72 -1.0 -10.0
18 N Seattle U W 61–58 -3.8 +6.8
19 N Santa Clara L 68–76 -14.9 +6.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #39 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #39 of 326 (27-4)2005–06: #57 of 326 (24-8)2006–07: #209 of 326 (12-19)2007–08: #115 of 328 (21-10)2008–09: #103 of 330 (21-13)2009–10: #86 of 335 (23-12)2010–11: #161 of 346 (16-15)2011–12: #271 of 345 (11-19)2012–13: #106 of 347 (20-12)2013–14: #156 of 351 (18-16)2014–15: #258 of 351 (12-19)2015–16: #250 of 351 (8-20)2016–17: #232 of 351 (11-22)2017–18: #182 of 351 (14-18)2018–19: #210 of 353 (12-18)2019–20: #76 of 353 (21-10)2020–21: #123 of 347 (9-9)2021–22: #276 of 358 (8-22)2022–23: #236 of 363 (15-18)2023–24: #352 of 362 (6-26)2024–25: #325 of 364 (9-24)2025–26: #160 of 365 (18-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 160 of 365 18–15 0.29 Power
2024–25 325 of 364 9–24 -11.65 Power
2023–24 352 of 362 6–26 -16.73 Power
2022–23 236 of 363 15–18 -4.62 Power
2021–22 276 of 358 8–22 -7.48 Power
2020–21 123 of 347 9–9 3.53 Power
2019–20 76 of 353 21–10 80.59 MRI
2018–19 210 of 353 12–18 12.50 MRI
2017–18 182 of 351 14–18 33.37 MRI
2016–17 232 of 351 11–22 10.71 MRI
2015–16 250 of 351 8–20 -3.12 MRI
2014–15 258 of 351 12–19 -0.12 MRI
2013–14 156 of 351 18–16 42.92 MRI
2012–13 106 of 347 20–12 56.81 MRI
2011–12 271 of 345 11–19 -11.44 MRI
2010–11 161 of 346 16–15 39.73 MRI
2009–10 86 of 335 23–12 81.35 MRI
2008–09 103 of 330 21–13 64.76 MRI
2007–08 115 of 328 21–10 60.37 MRI
2006–07 209 of 326 12–19 13.22 MRI
2005–06 57 of 326 24–8 94.08 MRI
2004–05 39 of 326 27–4 105.41 MRI