Prairie View A&M
SWAC · 2–2
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -0.1 avg | × 33% | +0.0 |
| Opponents faced | -15.7 avg | × 33% | -5.3 |
| Preseason prior | -13.2 | × 67% | -8.8 |
| Power | -14.1 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs | Paul Quinn non-D1 | W 86–65 | +22.0 | -1.0 | -1.0 |
| 2 | vs | College Of Biblical Studies non-D1 | W 103–90 | +22.0 | -9.0 | -2.3 |
| 2 | at | UT Rio Grande Valley | L 63–68 | -10.6 | +5.6 | -0.5 |
| 3 | at | SMU | L 63–98 | -31.4 | -3.6 | -1.5 |
| Preseason prior (67% of the rating) | -8.8 | |||||
| Power | -14.1 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | at | Vanderbilt | -44.2 | 0% |
| 4 | at | Ohio State | -34.1 | 0% |
| 5 | at | Marshall | -15.1 | 8% |
| 5 | at | Iowa | -35.5 | 0% |
| 9 | at | Texas | -38.3 | 0% |
Season by season
Best finish: #174 in 2018–19. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 19–18 | #304 of 365 · -10.84 | – |
| 2024–25 | 5–27 | #360 of 364 · -18.51 | – |
| 2023–24 | 10–21 | #332 of 362 · -13.15 | – |
| 2022–23 | 13–19 | #290 of 363 · -7.90 | – |
| 2021–22 | 8–19 | #288 of 358 · -8.34 | – |
| 2020–21 | 16–5 | #196 of 347 · -2.34 | – |
| 2019–20 | 17–13 | – | #179 of 353 · 32.59 |
| 2018–19 | 21–13 | – | #174 of 353 · 29.77 |
| 2017–18 | 16–18 | – | #243 of 351 · 5.68 |
| 2016–17 | 13–20 | – | #301 of 351 · -26.63 |
| 2015–16 | 7–24 | – | #336 of 351 · -61.38 |
| 2014–15 | 15–18 | – | #294 of 351 · -21.02 |
| 2013–14 | 11–23 | – | #322 of 351 · -41.84 |
| 2012–13 | 12–19 | – | #272 of 347 · -21.35 |
| 2011–12 | 14–18 | – | #277 of 345 · -13.95 |
| 2010–11 | 10–22 | – | #326 of 346 · -58.91 |
| 2009–10 | 16–14 | – | #243 of 335 · 2.05 |
| 2008–09 | 17–16 | – | #244 of 330 · 0.31 |
| 2007–08 | 8–22 | – | #317 of 328 · -60.11 |
| 2006–07 | 8–22 | – | #322 of 326 · -65.03 |
| 2005–06 | 5–24 | – | #324 of 326 · -100.32 |
| 2004–05 | 5–23 | – | #322 of 326 · -84.59 |