The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Texas

SEC · 21–15

Power+15.7#35 of 365
Résumé+10.56#47 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winGonzaga (74–68)
Worst lossMississippi State (98–101)
Schedule faced+9.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Duke L 60–75 -16.1 +1.1
1 vs Lafayette W 97–60 +31.5 +5.5
2 vs Fairleigh Dickinson W 93–58 +31.7 +3.3
2 vs Kansas City W 71–55 +37.3 -21.3
3 vs Rider W 99–65 +36.4 -2.4
4 N Arizona State L 86–87 +7.3 -8.3
4 at Chaminade non-D1 W 119–78 +50.8 -9.8
4 N NC State W 102–97 +1.9 +3.1
5 vs Virginia L 69–88 +0.1 -19.1
6 vs Southern W 95–69 +26.0 +0.0
6 at UConn L 63–71 -11.3 +3.3
7 vs Le Moyne W 95–53 +29.1 +12.9
8 vs Maryland Eastern Shore W 94–71 +34.0 -11.0
9 vs Mississippi State L 98–101 +12.3 -15.3
10 at Tennessee L 71–85 -10.1 -3.9
10 at Alabama W 92–88 -11.5 +15.5
11 vs Vanderbilt W 80–64 -3.2 +19.2
11 vs Texas A&M L 70–74 +2.8 -6.8
12 at Kentucky L 80–85 -5.2 +0.2
12 vs Georgia W 87–67 +1.9 +18.1
13 at Auburn L 82–88 -5.6 -0.4
13 at Oklahoma W 79–69 -0.9 +10.9
14 vs South Carolina W 84–75 +13.0 -4.0
14 vs Ole Miss W 79–68 +8.7 +2.3
15 at Missouri W 85–68 +0.2 +16.8
16 vs LSU W 88–85 +8.9 -5.9
16 at Georgia L 80–91 -3.5 -7.5
17 vs Florida L 71–84 -10.7 -2.3
17 at Texas A&M W 76–70 -2.6 +8.7
18 at Arkansas L 85–105 -8.1 -11.9
18 vs Oklahoma L 85–88 +4.5 -7.5
19 N Ole Miss L 66–76 +5.9 -15.9
20 N NC State W 68–66 +1.9 +0.1
20 N BYU W 79–71 -3.5 +11.5
20 N Gonzaga W 74–68 -9.1 +15.1
21 N Purdue L 77–79 -9.9 +7.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #32 of 326 (20-11)2005–06: #2 of 326 (30-7)2006–07: #28 of 326 (25-10)2007–08: #8 of 328 (31-7)2008–09: #28 of 330 (23-12)2009–10: #13 of 335 (24-10)2010–11: #4 of 346 (28-8)2011–12: #50 of 345 (20-14)2012–13: #112 of 347 (16-16)2013–14: #50 of 351 (24-11)2014–15: #33 of 351 (20-14)2015–16: #91 of 351 (20-13)2016–17: #205 of 351 (11-22)2017–18: #95 of 351 (19-15)2018–19: #38 of 353 (21-16)2019–20: #124 of 353 (19-12)2020–21: #28 of 347 (19-8)2021–22: #19 of 358 (22-12)2022–23: #9 of 363 (29-9)2023–24: #21 of 362 (21-13)2024–25: #49 of 364 (19-16)2025–26: #35 of 365 (21-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 35 of 365 21–15 15.69 Power
2024–25 49 of 364 19–16 12.32 Power
2023–24 21 of 362 21–13 15.79 Power
2022–23 9 of 363 29–9 19.27 Power
2021–22 19 of 358 22–12 14.91 Power
2020–21 28 of 347 19–8 12.44 Power
2019–20 124 of 353 19–12 51.79 MRI
2018–19 38 of 353 21–16 104.52 MRI
2017–18 95 of 351 19–15 76.34 MRI
2016–17 205 of 351 11–22 26.26 MRI
2015–16 91 of 351 20–13 76.72 MRI
2014–15 33 of 351 20–14 120.99 MRI
2013–14 50 of 351 24–11 103.80 MRI
2012–13 112 of 347 16–16 54.94 MRI
2011–12 50 of 345 20–14 102.78 MRI
2010–11 4 of 346 28–8 196.34 MRI
2009–10 13 of 335 24–10 152.74 MRI
2008–09 28 of 330 23–12 128.06 MRI
2007–08 8 of 328 31–7 176.35 MRI
2006–07 28 of 326 25–10 127.86 MRI
2005–06 2 of 326 30–7 210.30 MRI
2004–05 32 of 326 20–11 112.83 MRI