The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

Southland · 19–14

Power+0.1#165 of 365
Résumé-1.02#466 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winMcNeese (79–76)
Worst lossEast Texas A&M (69–77)
Schedule faced-4.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Baylor L 81–96 -16.1 +1.1
1 at Southern Utah W 95–72 +5.8 +17.2
2 at Boise State L 65–85 -13.5 -6.5
3 vs Southwestern Adventist non-D1 W 110–53 +40.7 +16.3
3 at Missouri State L 67–74 +0.1 -7.1
4 at Illinois L 73–87 -29.2 +15.2
5 at Stephen F. Austin L 60–73 -7.1 -5.9
5 vs Austin Peay W 63–50 +3.1 +9.8
6 vs UT Arlington L 50–58 +3.4 -11.4
7 at Lamar W 83–72 +2.6 +8.4
7 vs College Of Biblical Studies non-D1 W 109–51 +40.7 +17.3
9 vs New Orleans L 69–85 +9.6 -25.6
9 vs Nicholls L 69–71 +9.5 -11.5
9 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi L 59–63 +4.7 -8.7
10 vs Incarnate Word W 80–67 +10.3 +2.7
10 at East Texas A&M L 69–77 +9.9 -17.9
11 at Northwestern State L 63–64 +7.9 -8.9
11 vs McNeese W 79–76 -7.1 +10.1
12 vs SE Louisiana W 68–65 +12.4 -9.4
12 at Houston Christian W 68–51 +9.6 +7.4
13 at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 64–55 -0.8 +9.8
13 at Incarnate Word W 106–93 +4.9 +8.1
14 vs Houston Christian W 74–57 +15.1 +1.9
14 at New Orleans W 95–76 +4.1 +14.9
15 at Nicholls W 92–72 +4.1 +15.9
15 vs Stephen F. Austin L 57–66 -1.6 -7.4
16 vs Lamar W 70–65 +8.1 -3.1
16 at SE Louisiana W 96–75 +6.9 +14.1
17 at McNeese L 68–75 -12.6 +5.6
17 vs East Texas A&M W 63–55 +15.4 -7.4
18 vs Northwestern State W 74–62 +13.4 -1.4
19 N Nicholls W 86–68 +6.8 +11.2
19 N McNeese L 80–84 -9.8 +5.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #165 in 2025–26. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #282 of 326 (12-16)2005–06: #323 of 326 (7-24)2006–07: #238 of 326 (14-15)2007–08: #211 of 328 (18-13)2008–09: #286 of 330 (10-17)2009–10: #323 of 335 (6-27)2010–11: #329 of 346 (6-25)2011–12: #310 of 345 (10-18)2012–13: #309 of 347 (12-16)2013–14: #310 of 351 (9-23)2014–15: #338 of 351 (10-21)2015–16: #348 of 351 (8-22)2016–17: #295 of 351 (10-22)2017–18: #257 of 351 (15-18)2018–19: #179 of 353 (18-17)2019–20: #233 of 353 (10-16)2020–21: #218 of 347 (9-10)2021–22: #285 of 358 (8-23)2022–23: #256 of 363 (15-17)2023–24: #330 of 362 (6-25)2024–25: #279 of 364 (16-15)2025–26: #165 of 365 (19-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 165 of 365 19–14 0.10 Power
2024–25 279 of 364 16–15 -7.82 Power
2023–24 330 of 362 6–25 -12.86 Power
2022–23 256 of 363 15–17 -5.63 Power
2021–22 285 of 358 8–23 -8.15 Power
2020–21 218 of 347 9–10 -3.00 Power
2019–20 233 of 353 10–16 4.05 MRI
2018–19 179 of 353 18–17 26.65 MRI
2017–18 257 of 351 15–18 -0.32 MRI
2016–17 295 of 351 10–22 -23.45 MRI
2015–16 348 of 351 8–22 -81.25 MRI
2014–15 338 of 351 10–21 -58.06 MRI
2013–14 310 of 351 9–23 -32.55 MRI
2012–13 309 of 347 12–16 -40.49 MRI
2011–12 310 of 345 10–18 -40.59 MRI
2010–11 329 of 346 6–25 -62.11 MRI
2009–10 323 of 335 6–27 -68.72 MRI
2008–09 286 of 330 10–17 -22.30 MRI
2007–08 211 of 328 18–13 13.10 MRI
2006–07 238 of 326 14–15 -2.64 MRI
2005–06 323 of 326 7–24 -81.98 MRI
2004–05 282 of 326 12–16 -22.19 MRI