The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Illinois State

MVC · 23–13

Power+6.8#93 of 365
Résumé+6.78#77 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBelmont (81–74)
Worst lossEvansville (80–88)
Schedule faced+1.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Ohio L 68–72 +7.9 -11.9
1 vs Cornell W 76–65 +6.5 +4.5
2 N USC L 67–87 -2.0 -18.0
3 at Long Beach State W 82–80 +12.4 -10.4
3 vs Rockford non-D1 W 93–48 +47.4 -2.4
3 vs Coastal Carolina W 94–42 +15.8 +36.2
4 N Charlotte W 79–69 +9.7 +0.3
4 N Furman W 72–65 +5.2 +1.8
5 vs Eastern Kentucky W 89–78 +17.1 -6.1
5 vs Chicago State W 95–53 +27.1 +14.9
6 N Utah State L 78–83 -11.3 +6.3
7 at Southern Illinois W 75–68 +0.8 +6.2
7 vs Indiana State W 85–65 +11.5 +8.5
9 at Drake W 73–56 +3.4 +13.6
9 vs Evansville W 73–47 +19.8 +6.2
10 at Valparaiso L 71–77 +4.7 -10.7
10 vs UIC L 59–63 +5.5 -9.5
11 at Indiana State L 89–94 +6.1 -11.1
11 vs Bradley W 88–62 +4.6 +21.4
12 vs Northern Iowa W 59–54 +0.1 +4.9
12 at Belmont L 69–80 -6.3 -4.7
13 at Murray State W 70–65 +0.5 +4.5
14 vs Southern Illinois L 50–54 +6.2 -10.2
14 vs Drake W 86–76 +8.9 +1.1
15 at Evansville L 80–88 +14.3 -22.3
15 vs Valparaiso W 86–64 +10.1 +11.9
15 at UIC L 56–83 +0.1 -27.1
16 vs Murray State W 78–61 +6.0 +11.0
16 at Bradley L 60–74 -0.9 -13.1
17 at Northern Iowa W 71–69 -5.4 +7.4
17 vs Belmont W 81–74 -0.9 +7.9
18 N Northern Iowa L 52–74 -2.6 -19.4
20 vs Kent State W 79–58 +7.3 +13.7
20 at Wake Forest W 78–75 -4.8 +7.8
21 at Dayton W 61–55 -5.8 +11.8
22 N Auburn L 66–88 -11.8 -10.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #32 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #155 of 326 (17-12)2005–06: #223 of 326 (9-19)2006–07: #125 of 326 (15-16)2007–08: #56 of 328 (25-10)2008–09: #34 of 330 (24-10)2009–10: #72 of 335 (22-11)2010–11: #225 of 346 (12-19)2011–12: #108 of 345 (20-13)2012–13: #78 of 347 (18-15)2013–14: #161 of 351 (18-16)2014–15: #48 of 351 (22-13)2015–16: #134 of 351 (18-14)2016–17: #32 of 351 (28-7)2017–18: #202 of 351 (17-14)2018–19: #211 of 353 (16-16)2019–20: #270 of 353 (9-21)2020–21: #240 of 347 (7-18)2021–22: #207 of 358 (13-20)2022–23: #272 of 363 (11-21)2023–24: #211 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #136 of 364 (22-14)2025–26: #93 of 365 (23-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 93 of 365 23–13 6.77 Power
2024–25 136 of 364 22–14 2.10 Power
2023–24 211 of 362 15–17 -3.31 Power
2022–23 272 of 363 11–21 -6.66 Power
2021–22 207 of 358 13–20 -2.38 Power
2020–21 240 of 347 7–18 -5.08 Power
2019–20 270 of 353 9–21 -10.78 MRI
2018–19 211 of 353 16–16 11.82 MRI
2017–18 202 of 351 17–14 25.32 MRI
2016–17 32 of 351 28–7 120.86 MRI
2015–16 134 of 351 18–14 56.42 MRI
2014–15 48 of 351 22–13 102.76 MRI
2013–14 161 of 351 18–16 41.06 MRI
2012–13 78 of 347 18–15 73.03 MRI
2011–12 108 of 345 20–13 66.12 MRI
2010–11 225 of 346 12–19 11.81 MRI
2009–10 72 of 335 22–11 86.66 MRI
2008–09 34 of 330 24–10 119.26 MRI
2007–08 56 of 328 25–10 99.13 MRI
2006–07 125 of 326 15–16 52.97 MRI
2005–06 223 of 326 9–19 8.88 MRI
2004–05 155 of 326 17–12 35.22 MRI