The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Illinois State

MVC · 1–2

Power+6.8#95 of 365
Résumé-0.12#209 · wins above average
Movement+2up from #97 last week
Best winCentral State (OH) (100–55)
Worst lossSaint Mary's (85–90)
Schedule faced+2.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-5.0 avg opponent
Returning production36% of last season's win shares · #86 of 364
Incoming production7.0 win shares from other schools' players
Recruiting class#166 in the country

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+7.3 avg× 27%+2.0
Opponents faced+2.5 avg× 27%+0.7
Preseason prior+5.7× 73%+4.1
Power+6.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Saint Mary's L 85–90 -10.8 +5.8 +1.4
2 vs Central State (OH) non-D1 W 100–55 +43.0 +2.0 +0.9
3 at Purdue L 59–76 -16.2 -0.8 +0.4
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)+4.1
Power+6.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at North Dakota State +7.2 74%
4 vs Bellarmine +18.4 95%
4 vs Eureka non-D1 +43.0 100%
5 N Santa Clara -4.7 34%
5 N Tulsa -1.8 43%

Season by season

Best finish: #32 in 2016–17. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 300 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #155 of 326 (17-12)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #223 of 326 (9-19)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #125 of 326 (15-16)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #56 of 328 (25-10)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #34 of 330 (24-10)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #72 of 335 (22-11)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #225 of 346 (12-19)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #108 of 345 (20-13)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #78 of 347 (18-15)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #161 of 351 (18-16)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #48 of 351 (22-13)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #134 of 351 (18-14)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #32 of 351 (28-7)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #202 of 351 (17-14)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #211 of 353 (16-16)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #270 of 353 (9-21)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #253 of 347 (7-18)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #214 of 358 (13-20)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #273 of 363 (11-21)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #203 of 362 (15-17)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #144 of 364 (22-14)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 365 (23-13) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 23–13 #97 of 365 · 6.49 –
2024–25 22–14 #144 of 364 · 1.43 –
2023–24 15–17 #203 of 362 · -3.18 –
2022–23 11–21 #273 of 363 · -7.16 –
2021–22 13–20 #214 of 358 · -2.84 –
2020–21 7–18 #253 of 347 · -6.04 –
2019–20 9–21 – #270 of 353 · -10.78
2018–19 16–16 – #211 of 353 · 11.82
2017–18 17–14 – #202 of 351 · 25.32
2016–17 28–7 – #32 of 351 · 120.86
2015–16 18–14 – #134 of 351 · 56.42
2014–15 22–13 – #48 of 351 · 102.76
2013–14 18–16 – #161 of 351 · 41.06
2012–13 18–15 – #78 of 347 · 73.03
2011–12 20–13 – #108 of 345 · 66.12
2010–11 12–19 – #225 of 346 · 11.81
2009–10 22–11 – #72 of 335 · 86.66
2008–09 24–10 – #34 of 330 · 119.26
2007–08 25–10 – #56 of 328 · 99.13
2006–07 15–16 – #125 of 326 · 52.97
2005–06 9–19 – #223 of 326 · 8.88
2004–05 17–12 – #155 of 326 · 35.22