The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Saint Mary's

WCC · 27–6

Power+18.8#23 of 365
Résumé+13.44#30 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winGonzaga (70–59)
Worst lossBoise State (67–68)
Schedule faced+3.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota W 84–58 +15.7 +10.3
1 vs Chattanooga W 87–66 +26.3 -5.3
2 vs Ohio W 90–60 +25.4 +4.6
2 vs North Texas W 80–49 +18.3 +12.7
3 vs Arkansas State W 85–72 +17.7 -4.7
3 vs UC Merced non-D1 W 96–42 +59.4 -5.4
4 N Wichita State W 70–65 +10.2 -5.2
4 N Virginia Tech W 77–66 +9.8 +1.2
4 N Vanderbilt L 71–96 -2.8 -22.2
5 at Davidson W 70–61 +13.0 -4.0
6 N Boise State L 67–68 +7.9 -8.9
7 vs Florida Atlantic W 88–75 +17.4 -4.4
8 vs Northern Iowa W 63–58 +12.1 -7.1
9 at Loyola Marymount W 78–73 +16.8 -11.8
9 at Pepperdine W 72–45 +26.0 +1.0
9 vs Portland W 78–57 +27.8 -6.8
10 vs Seattle U W 93–76 +17.5 -0.5
10 vs Washington State W 88–82 +20.4 -14.4
11 at San Francisco W 82–68 +12.0 +2.0
11 at Santa Clara L 54–62 +0.9 -8.9
12 vs Oregon State W 81–51 +22.0 +8.0
12 at Portland W 75–69 +22.3 -16.3
13 at Gonzaga L 65–73 -8.7 +0.7
14 vs San Diego W 87–60 +29.8 -2.8
14 vs San Francisco W 79–54 +17.5 +7.5
15 vs Pepperdine W 88–60 +31.5 -3.5
15 at Pacific W 72–61 +15.8 -4.8
16 at Seattle U W 72–70 +12.0 -10.0
16 at Washington State W 83–67 +14.9 +1.1
17 vs Santa Clara W 86–67 +6.3 +12.7
17 vs Gonzaga W 70–59 -3.2 +14.2
19 N Santa Clara L 71–76 +3.6 -8.6
20 N Texas A&M L 50–63 +3.2 -16.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #7 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 150 2004–05: #64 of 326 (25-9)2005–06: #103 of 326 (17-12)2006–07: #100 of 326 (17-15)2007–08: #39 of 328 (25-7)2008–09: #30 of 330 (28-7)2009–10: #18 of 335 (28-6)2010–11: #24 of 346 (25-9)2011–12: #12 of 345 (27-6)2012–13: #19 of 347 (26-6)2013–14: #39 of 351 (23-12)2014–15: #62 of 351 (21-10)2015–16: #22 of 351 (29-6)2016–17: #7 of 351 (29-5)2017–18: #10 of 351 (30-6)2018–19: #21 of 353 (22-12)2019–20: #28 of 353 (25-8)2020–21: #65 of 347 (14-10)2021–22: #20 of 358 (26-8)2022–23: #12 of 363 (27-8)2023–24: #16 of 362 (26-8)2024–25: #23 of 364 (29-6)2025–26: #23 of 365 (27-6) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 23 of 365 27–6 18.81 Power
2024–25 23 of 364 29–6 17.63 Power
2023–24 16 of 362 26–8 16.69 Power
2022–23 12 of 363 27–8 17.09 Power
2021–22 20 of 358 26–8 14.89 Power
2020–21 65 of 347 14–10 8.54 Power
2019–20 28 of 353 25–8 111.72 MRI
2018–19 21 of 353 22–12 138.44 MRI
2017–18 10 of 351 30–6 162.27 MRI
2016–17 7 of 351 29–5 193.67 MRI
2015–16 22 of 351 29–6 144.78 MRI
2014–15 62 of 351 21–10 91.30 MRI
2013–14 39 of 351 23–12 115.32 MRI
2012–13 19 of 347 26–6 140.24 MRI
2011–12 12 of 345 27–6 153.85 MRI
2010–11 24 of 346 25–9 136.31 MRI
2009–10 18 of 335 28–6 144.68 MRI
2008–09 30 of 330 28–7 122.64 MRI
2007–08 39 of 328 25–7 116.71 MRI
2006–07 100 of 326 17–15 66.06 MRI
2005–06 103 of 326 17–12 60.40 MRI
2004–05 64 of 326 25–9 83.21 MRI