The MRI
2025–26 · Final

North Dakota State

Summit · 27–8

Power+5.2#103 of 365
Résumé+4.53#103 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSt. Thomas-Minnesota (68–65)
Worst lossUTEP (66–76)
Schedule faced-6.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Oregon State L 65–67 +3.0 -5.0
1 at UC Davis L 68–80 +4.1 -16.1
2 vs Cal State Northridge W 90–68 +9.1 +12.9
2 vs St. Scholastica non-D1 W 111–38 +45.8 +27.2
3 vs Southern Illinois W 92–85 +4.7 +2.3
3 vs Jamestown non-D1 W 82–67 +45.8 -30.8
4 N Jacksonville State W 56–43 +6.1 +6.9
4 at Arkansas State L 80–85 -1.4 -3.6
5 at Montana W 81–72 +4.6 +4.4
5 vs Northern Arizona W 69–68 +19.0 -18.0
6 at Cal State Bakersfield W 80–69 +17.2 -6.2
6 at Drake W 99–94 +1.9 +3.1
7 vs Minnesota Crookston non-D1 W 101–67 +45.8 -11.8
8 N UC Irvine L 73–74 -0.7 -0.3
8 at UTEP L 66–76 +8.8 -18.8
9 vs South Dakota W 84–61 +16.2 +6.8
9 vs Oral Roberts W 79–77 +19.2 -17.2
10 at Kansas City W 97–73 +21.4 +2.6
10 at Omaha W 78–76 +8.0 -6.0
11 vs South Dakota State W 76–65 +9.1 +1.9
11 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota W 68–65 +2.1 +0.9
12 at Denver W 82–77 +8.0 -3.0
12 at Oral Roberts W 86–58 +13.8 +14.2
13 at South Dakota W 89–84 +10.7 -5.7
14 vs Denver L 71–78 +13.5 -20.5
14 vs Omaha W 92–84 +13.4 -5.4
15 at North Dakota W 83–66 +9.7 +7.3
16 at South Dakota State W 74–66 +3.6 +4.4
16 vs Kansas City W 95–59 +26.8 +9.2
17 at St. Thomas-Minnesota L 62–84 -3.3 -18.7
17 vs North Dakota W 96–63 +15.1 +17.9
18 N Oral Roberts W 76–65 +16.5 -5.5
18 N Omaha W 74–50 +10.7 +13.3
19 N North Dakota W 70–62 +12.4 -4.4
20 N Michigan State L 67–92 -19.1 -5.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #45 in 2013–14. 18 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2008–09: #48 of 330 (26-7)2009–10: #225 of 335 (11-18)2010–11: #154 of 346 (14-15)2011–12: #126 of 345 (16-13)2012–13: #61 of 347 (22-9)2013–14: #45 of 351 (26-7)2014–15: #129 of 351 (23-10)2015–16: #131 of 351 (20-13)2016–17: #144 of 351 (19-11)2017–18: #191 of 351 (15-17)2018–19: #207 of 353 (17-16)2019–20: #96 of 353 (23-8)2020–21: #117 of 347 (15-12)2021–22: #132 of 358 (23-10)2022–23: #204 of 363 (16-17)2023–24: #243 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #147 of 364 (21-11)2025–26: #103 of 365 (27-8) 2008–09 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 103 of 365 27–8 5.22 Power
2024–25 147 of 364 21–11 1.37 Power
2023–24 243 of 362 15–17 -4.74 Power
2022–23 204 of 363 16–17 -2.08 Power
2021–22 132 of 358 23–10 3.31 Power
2020–21 117 of 347 15–12 4.02 Power
2019–20 96 of 353 23–8 68.91 MRI
2018–19 207 of 353 17–16 14.60 MRI
2017–18 191 of 351 15–17 28.28 MRI
2016–17 144 of 351 19–11 47.34 MRI
2015–16 131 of 351 20–13 57.51 MRI
2014–15 129 of 351 23–10 53.74 MRI
2013–14 45 of 351 26–7 111.12 MRI
2012–13 61 of 347 22–9 93.20 MRI
2011–12 126 of 345 16–13 55.61 MRI
2010–11 154 of 346 14–15 41.66 MRI
2009–10 225 of 335 11–18 9.22 MRI
2008–09 48 of 330 26–7 105.57 MRI