The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Nicholls

Southland · 1–2

Power-8.2#268 of 365
Résumé-1.00#477 · wins above average
Movement-8down from #260 last week
Best winNorth American (110–56)
Worst lossTulane (63–77)
Schedule faced-11.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+1.5 avg opponent
Returning production7% of last season's win shares · #295 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production2.3 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+8.5 avg× 27%+2.3
Opponents faced-11.0 avg× 27%-3.0
Preseason prior-10.4× 73%-7.5
Power-8.2

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs North American non-D1 W 110–56 +27.9 +26.1 +1.2
2 at UAB L 63–70 -10.4 +3.4 -0.3
3 at Tulane L 63–77 -5.7 -8.3 -1.6
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-7.5
Power-8.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Louisiana Tech -0.8 47%
4 at Ole Miss -28.6 0%
4 N Southern Miss -3.0 39%
4 N Troy -5.8 30%
5 at Texas State -13.6 11%

Season by season

Best finish: #127 in 2017–18. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #308 of 326 (6-21)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #308 of 326 (9-18)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #311 of 326 (8-22)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #255 of 328 (10-21)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #134 of 330 (20-11)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #277 of 335 (11-19)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #199 of 346 (14-14)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #331 of 345 (10-20)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #291 of 347 (9-21)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #267 of 351 (14-15)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #320 of 351 (10-19)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #334 of 351 (11-23)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #314 of 351 (14-17)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #127 of 351 (21-11)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #316 of 353 (10-17)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #176 of 353 (17-10)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #145 of 347 (18-7)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #185 of 358 (21-12)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #243 of 363 (16-15)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #248 of 362 (20-14)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #174 of 364 (20-13)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #266 of 365 (14-19) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 14–19 #266 of 365 · -7.09 –
2024–25 20–13 #174 of 364 · -0.78 –
2023–24 20–14 #248 of 362 · -5.31 –
2022–23 16–15 #243 of 363 · -4.84 –
2021–22 21–12 #185 of 358 · -0.63 –
2020–21 18–7 #145 of 347 · 1.43 –
2019–20 17–10 – #176 of 353 · 33.23
2018–19 10–17 – #316 of 353 · -41.51
2017–18 21–11 – #127 of 351 · 58.83
2016–17 14–17 – #314 of 351 · -32.15
2015–16 11–23 – #334 of 351 · -58.14
2014–15 10–19 – #320 of 351 · -38.80
2013–14 14–15 – #267 of 351 · -7.08
2012–13 9–21 – #291 of 347 · -26.93
2011–12 10–20 – #331 of 345 · -70.68
2010–11 14–14 – #199 of 346 · 24.72
2009–10 11–19 – #277 of 335 · -17.35
2008–09 20–11 – #134 of 330 · 48.79
2007–08 10–21 – #255 of 328 · -10.66
2006–07 8–22 – #311 of 326 · -48.99
2005–06 9–18 – #308 of 326 · -53.99
2004–05 6–21 – #308 of 326 · -43.54