The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Ole Miss

SEC · 15–20

Power+9.7#65 of 365
Résumé+5.61#90 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winAlabama (80–79)
Worst lossUtah (74–75)
Schedule faced+10.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs SE Louisiana W 88–58 +22.0 +8.0
1 vs UL Monroe W 86–65 +31.3 -10.3
2 vs Memphis W 83–77 +8.5 -2.5
2 vs Cal State Bakersfield W 82–60 +27.2 -5.2
3 vs Austin Peay W 72–65 +12.8 -5.8
4 N Iowa L 69–74 -8.0 +3.0
4 N Utah L 74–75 +6.8 -7.8
5 vs Miami L 66–75 -1.1 -7.9
5 at St. John's L 58–63 -16.4 +11.4
6 N Southern Miss W 71–67 +13.8 -9.8
7 vs Alabama A&M W 80–66 +25.2 -11.2
7 N NC State L 62–76 -4.0 -10.0
9 vs Alcorn State W 79–43 +30.3 +5.7
9 at Oklahoma L 70–86 -6.9 -9.1
10 vs Arkansas L 87–94 -8.6 +1.6
10 vs Missouri W 76–69 -0.2 +7.2
11 at Georgia W 97–95 -9.5 +11.5
11 at Mississippi State W 68–67 +0.9 +0.1
12 vs Auburn L 66–78 -6.0 -6.0
12 at Kentucky L 63–72 -11.1 +2.1
13 at Vanderbilt L 68–71 -14.6 +11.6
14 at Tennessee L 66–84 -16.1 -1.9
14 at Texas L 68–79 -8.7 -2.3
15 vs Alabama L 74–93 -12.0 -7.0
15 vs Mississippi State L 78–90 +6.3 -18.3
16 at Texas A&M L 77–80 -8.6 +5.6
16 vs Florida L 75–94 -16.6 -2.4
17 vs LSU L 99–106 +3.0 -10.0
17 at Auburn W 85–79 -11.5 +17.5
18 vs Vanderbilt L 86–89 -9.1 +6.1
18 vs South Carolina L 61–64 +7.0 -10.0
19 N Texas W 76–66 -5.9 +15.9
19 N Georgia W 76–72 -6.7 +10.7
19 N Alabama W 80–79 -14.7 +15.7
19 N Arkansas L 90–93 -11.3 +8.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #27 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #149 of 326 (14-17)2005–06: #176 of 326 (14-16)2006–07: #61 of 326 (21-13)2007–08: #34 of 328 (24-11)2008–09: #116 of 330 (16-15)2009–10: #47 of 335 (24-11)2010–11: #68 of 346 (20-14)2011–12: #117 of 345 (20-14)2012–13: #27 of 347 (26-8)2013–14: #118 of 351 (19-14)2014–15: #60 of 351 (21-13)2015–16: #92 of 351 (20-12)2016–17: #104 of 351 (21-14)2017–18: #170 of 351 (12-20)2018–19: #65 of 353 (20-13)2019–20: #135 of 353 (15-17)2020–21: #76 of 347 (16-12)2021–22: #116 of 358 (13-19)2022–23: #127 of 363 (12-21)2023–24: #90 of 362 (20-12)2024–25: #33 of 364 (24-12)2025–26: #65 of 365 (15-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 65 of 365 15–20 9.74 Power
2024–25 33 of 364 24–12 15.57 Power
2023–24 90 of 362 20–12 6.25 Power
2022–23 127 of 363 12–21 3.35 Power
2021–22 116 of 358 13–19 4.33 Power
2020–21 76 of 347 16–12 7.60 Power
2019–20 135 of 353 15–17 46.63 MRI
2018–19 65 of 353 20–13 85.36 MRI
2017–18 170 of 351 12–20 40.10 MRI
2016–17 104 of 351 21–14 65.97 MRI
2015–16 92 of 351 20–12 76.62 MRI
2014–15 60 of 351 21–13 91.52 MRI
2013–14 118 of 351 19–14 60.34 MRI
2012–13 27 of 347 26–8 129.04 MRI
2011–12 117 of 345 20–14 62.68 MRI
2010–11 68 of 346 20–14 87.99 MRI
2009–10 47 of 335 24–11 115.39 MRI
2008–09 116 of 330 16–15 58.27 MRI
2007–08 34 of 328 24–11 120.99 MRI
2006–07 61 of 326 21–13 97.19 MRI
2005–06 176 of 326 14–16 29.39 MRI
2004–05 149 of 326 14–17 38.81 MRI