The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Sacramento State

Big West · 1–1

Power-6.0#237 of 365
Résumé-0.13#210 · wins above average
Movement-5down from #232 last week
Best winJessup University (90–74)
Worst lossSanta Clara (77–83)
Schedule faced-7.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-0.3 avg opponent
Returning production28% of last season's win shares · #138 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production9.4 win shares from other schools' players
Recruiting class#68 in the country

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 2 games, w is 20%, so the preseason prior is 80% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+7.0 avg× 20%+1.4
Opponents faced-7.5 avg× 20%-1.5
Preseason prior-7.4× 80%-5.9
Power-6.0

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Jessup University non-D1 W 90–74 +30.2 -14.2 -1.2
2 at Santa Clara L 77–83 -20.5 +14.5 +1.1
Preseason prior (80% of the rating)-5.9
Power-6.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs UC Davis +3.5 63%
4 at Stanford -20.9 3%
5 at Presbyterian -2.7 40%

Season by season

Best finish: #155 in 2014–15. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #260 of 326 (12-16)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #167 of 326 (15-15)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #300 of 326 (10-19)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #324 of 328 (4-24)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #329 of 330 (2-27)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #310 of 335 (9-21)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #311 of 346 (7-21)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #265 of 345 (10-18)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #235 of 347 (12-15)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #243 of 351 (14-16)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #155 of 351 (21-12)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #247 of 351 (14-17)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #284 of 351 (13-18)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #307 of 351 (7-25)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #213 of 353 (12-16)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #158 of 353 (14-14)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #202 of 347 (8-12)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #296 of 358 (11-18)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #255 of 363 (14-18)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #307 of 362 (10-24)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #338 of 364 (7-25)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #302 of 365 (10-21) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 10–21 #302 of 365 · -10.73 –
2024–25 7–25 #338 of 364 · -13.90 –
2023–24 10–24 #307 of 362 · -9.67 –
2022–23 14–18 #255 of 363 · -5.84 –
2021–22 11–18 #296 of 358 · -8.86 –
2020–21 8–12 #202 of 347 · -2.55 –
2019–20 14–14 – #158 of 353 · 37.83
2018–19 12–16 – #213 of 353 · 10.89
2017–18 7–25 – #307 of 351 · -31.04
2016–17 13–18 – #284 of 351 · -13.95
2015–16 14–17 – #247 of 351 · -2.24
2014–15 21–12 – #155 of 351 · 43.15
2013–14 14–16 – #243 of 351 · 8.15
2012–13 12–15 – #235 of 347 · -0.05
2011–12 10–18 – #265 of 345 · -8.39
2010–11 7–21 – #311 of 346 · -39.37
2009–10 9–21 – #310 of 335 · -47.77
2008–09 2–27 – #329 of 330 · -117.40
2007–08 4–24 – #324 of 328 · -84.17
2006–07 10–19 – #300 of 326 · -37.74
2005–06 15–15 – #167 of 326 · 31.76
2004–05 12–16 – #260 of 326 · -8.19