The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Stanford

ACC · 20–13

Power+9.0#71 of 365
Résumé+8.88#58 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLouisville (80–76)
Worst lossSeattle U (69–77)
Schedule faced+7.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Portland State W 89–79 +11.4 -1.4
1 vs Montana W 91–68 +13.8 +9.2
2 vs Montana State W 77–68 +10.1 -1.1
3 vs Louisiana W 93–66 +23.8 +3.2
3 vs Seattle U L 69–77 +7.7 -15.7
4 N Minnesota W 72–68 +2.0 +2.0
4 N Saint Louis W 78–77 -7.4 +8.4
5 vs Portland W 94–72 +18.0 +4.0
5 vs UNLV L 74–75 +7.2 -8.2
6 at San José State W 86–82 +12.0 -8.0
7 vs UT Arlington W 76–60 +12.4 +3.6
7 N Colorado W 77–68 +0.5 +8.5
8 vs Cal State Northridge W 88–80 +12.9 -4.9
9 vs Notre Dame L 40–47 +6.8 -13.8
9 vs Louisville W 80–76 -8.1 +12.1
10 at Virginia Tech W 69–68 -2.7 +3.7
10 at Virginia L 55–70 -12.0 -3.0
11 vs North Carolina W 95–90 -5.9 +10.9
11 vs Duke L 50–80 -20.0 -10.0
12 vs California L 66–78 +4.7 -16.7
13 at Miami L 70–79 -7.2 -1.8
13 at Florida State L 80–88 -2.4 -5.6
14 vs Clemson L 64–66 -4.1 +2.1
14 vs Georgia Tech W 95–72 +13.0 +10.0
15 at Boston College W 70–64 +7.9 -1.9
15 at Wake Forest L 63–68 -2.5 -2.5
16 at California L 66–72 -0.8 -5.2
17 vs Pittsburgh W 75–67 +6.2 +1.8
17 vs SMU W 95–75 -2.2 +22.2
18 at Notre Dame W 86–78 +1.3 +6.7
18 at NC State W 85–84 -7.5 +8.5
19 N Pittsburgh L 63–64 +3.5 -4.5
22 N West Virginia L 77–82 -2.8 -2.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #19 in 2007–08. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #77 of 326 (18-12)2005–06: #112 of 326 (16-14)2006–07: #91 of 326 (18-13)2007–08: #19 of 328 (28-8)2008–09: #77 of 330 (20-14)2009–10: #166 of 335 (14-18)2010–11: #129 of 346 (15-16)2011–12: #24 of 345 (26-11)2012–13: #62 of 347 (18-14)2013–14: #55 of 351 (23-13)2014–15: #38 of 351 (24-13)2015–16: #163 of 351 (15-15)2016–17: #135 of 351 (14-17)2017–18: #104 of 351 (19-16)2018–19: #139 of 353 (15-16)2019–20: #45 of 353 (20-12)2020–21: #85 of 347 (14-13)2021–22: #112 of 358 (16-16)2022–23: #100 of 363 (14-19)2023–24: #115 of 362 (14-18)2024–25: #90 of 364 (21-14)2025–26: #71 of 365 (20-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 71 of 365 20–13 9.04 Power
2024–25 90 of 364 21–14 6.50 Power
2023–24 115 of 362 14–18 4.56 Power
2022–23 100 of 363 14–19 5.84 Power
2021–22 112 of 358 16–16 4.62 Power
2020–21 85 of 347 14–13 7.19 Power
2019–20 45 of 353 20–12 95.75 MRI
2018–19 139 of 353 15–16 45.99 MRI
2017–18 104 of 351 19–16 70.53 MRI
2016–17 135 of 351 14–17 52.17 MRI
2015–16 163 of 351 15–15 44.42 MRI
2014–15 38 of 351 24–13 115.10 MRI
2013–14 55 of 351 23–13 99.81 MRI
2012–13 62 of 347 18–14 91.90 MRI
2011–12 24 of 345 26–11 136.91 MRI
2010–11 129 of 346 15–16 53.77 MRI
2009–10 166 of 335 14–18 36.83 MRI
2008–09 77 of 330 20–14 84.23 MRI
2007–08 19 of 328 28–8 142.02 MRI
2006–07 91 of 326 18–13 73.36 MRI
2005–06 112 of 326 16–14 56.65 MRI
2004–05 77 of 326 18–12 74.48 MRI