The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Stephen F. Austin

Southland · 28–6

Power+4.5#111 of 365
Résumé+5.93#84 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winMcNeese (67–60)
Worst lossNew Orleans (73–77)
Schedule faced-6.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Millsaps non-D1 W 103–76 +45.1 -18.1
1 vs Arkansas State W 90–65 +3.3 +21.7
2 at Rice W 81–69 +7.0 +5.0
2 vs Abilene Christian W 76–66 +13.5 -3.5
3 at Fresno State L 78–80 +2.9 -4.9
3 at Pepperdine W 63–60 +11.7 -8.7
4 at UT Arlington L 61–66 +2.3 -7.3
5 vs UT Rio Grande Valley W 73–60 +7.1 +5.9
5 vs UL Monroe W 96–76 +26.0 -6.0
7 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 69–60 +9.1 -0.1
7 vs Dallas non-D1 W 103–55 +45.1 +2.9
9 at East Texas A&M W 75–48 +14.3 +12.7
9 at Northwestern State W 74–64 +12.3 -2.3
9 at SE Louisiana W 73–63 +11.3 -1.3
10 at McNeese L 64–66 -8.2 +6.2
10 vs Houston Christian W 85–67 +19.5 -1.5
11 vs Incarnate Word W 56–46 +14.7 -4.7
11 at New Orleans W 84–79 +8.5 -3.5
12 at Nicholls W 79–62 +8.4 +8.6
12 at Lamar W 88–81 +7.0 +0.0
13 vs Northwestern State W 69–67 +17.8 -15.8
13 vs SE Louisiana W 85–58 +16.8 +10.2
14 vs McNeese W 67–60 -2.7 +9.8
14 vs Lamar W 84–74 +12.4 -2.4
15 vs East Texas A&M W 74–70 +19.7 -15.7
15 at UT Rio Grande Valley W 66–57 +1.6 +7.4
16 at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 78–68 +3.6 +6.4
16 vs Nicholls W 81–78 +13.9 -10.9
17 vs New Orleans L 73–77 +13.9 -17.9
17 at Houston Christian W 77–56 +14.0 +7.0
18 at Incarnate Word W 76–68 +9.2 -1.2
19 N Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 60–58 +6.3 -4.3
19 N McNeese L 59–76 -5.5 -11.5
20 at Tulsa L 84–89 -7.8 +2.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2014–15. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #170 of 326 (12-15)2005–06: #116 of 326 (17-12)2006–07: #153 of 326 (15-14)2007–08: #40 of 328 (26-6)2008–09: #78 of 330 (24-8)2009–10: #85 of 335 (23-9)2010–11: #105 of 346 (18-11)2011–12: #93 of 345 (20-12)2012–13: #48 of 347 (23-4)2013–14: #23 of 351 (32-3)2014–15: #11 of 351 (29-5)2015–16: #14 of 351 (28-6)2016–17: #176 of 351 (18-15)2017–18: #41 of 351 (28-7)2018–19: #290 of 353 (10-16)2019–20: #24 of 353 (25-3)2020–21: #74 of 347 (16-5)2021–22: #114 of 358 (22-10)2022–23: #116 of 363 (19-13)2023–24: #148 of 362 (18-15)2024–25: #262 of 364 (14-17)2025–26: #111 of 365 (28-6) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 111 of 365 28–6 4.46 Power
2024–25 262 of 364 14–17 -6.49 Power
2023–24 148 of 362 18–15 1.69 Power
2022–23 116 of 363 19–13 4.12 Power
2021–22 114 of 358 22–10 4.53 Power
2020–21 74 of 347 16–5 7.62 Power
2019–20 24 of 353 25–3 114.71 MRI
2018–19 290 of 353 10–16 -22.18 MRI
2017–18 41 of 351 28–7 116.54 MRI
2016–17 176 of 351 18–15 37.23 MRI
2015–16 14 of 351 28–6 165.49 MRI
2014–15 11 of 351 29–5 156.19 MRI
2013–14 23 of 351 32–3 147.37 MRI
2012–13 48 of 347 23–4 102.77 MRI
2011–12 93 of 345 20–12 74.20 MRI
2010–11 105 of 346 18–11 67.69 MRI
2009–10 85 of 335 23–9 82.17 MRI
2008–09 78 of 330 24–8 82.76 MRI
2007–08 40 of 328 26–6 115.72 MRI
2006–07 153 of 326 15–14 37.47 MRI
2005–06 116 of 326 17–12 55.04 MRI
2004–05 170 of 326 12–15 29.19 MRI