The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Indiana State

MVC · 1–2

Power-7.7#260 of 365
Résumé-1.01#478 · wins above average
Movement-33down from #227 last week
Best winBall State (69–66)
Worst lossMilwaukee (73–82)
Schedule faced-4.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-8.1 avg opponent
Returning production0% of last season's win shares · #335 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production7.8 win shares from other schools' players
Recruiting class#140 in the country

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-9.8 avg× 27%-2.7
Opponents faced-4.9 avg× 27%-1.3
Preseason prior-5.0× 73%-3.7
Power-7.7

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Charlotte L 70–78 -4.7 -3.3 -1.8
2 at Ball State W 69–66 -1.1 +4.1 +0.3
3 vs Milwaukee L 73–82 +0.6 -9.6 -2.5
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-3.7
Power-7.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Earlham College non-D1 +28.5 100%
4 N Stephen F. Austin -10.7 17%
5 vs IU Columbus non-D1 +28.5 100%
9 at Kansas -41.8 0%

Season by season

Best finish: #42 in 2023–24. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 300 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #229 of 326 (11-21)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #233 of 326 (13-16)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #211 of 326 (13-18)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #176 of 328 (15-16)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #268 of 330 (11-21)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #185 of 335 (17-15)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #151 of 346 (20-14)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #181 of 345 (18-14)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #145 of 347 (17-14)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #110 of 351 (23-11)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #212 of 351 (15-16)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #185 of 351 (15-17)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #275 of 351 (11-20)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #165 of 351 (13-18)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #247 of 353 (13-16)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #132 of 353 (17-12)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #143 of 347 (15-10)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #237 of 358 (11-20)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 363 (23-13)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 362 (32-7)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #171 of 364 (14-18)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #207 of 365 (11-21) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 11–21 #207 of 365 · -3.33 –
2024–25 14–18 #171 of 364 · -0.62 –
2023–24 32–7 #42 of 362 · 12.91 –
2022–23 23–13 #96 of 363 · 5.55 –
2021–22 11–20 #237 of 358 · -4.45 –
2020–21 15–10 #143 of 347 · 1.58 –
2019–20 17–12 – #132 of 353 · 48.29
2018–19 13–16 – #247 of 353 · -2.41
2017–18 13–18 – #165 of 351 · 40.63
2016–17 11–20 – #275 of 351 · -9.90
2015–16 15–17 – #185 of 351 · 29.84
2014–15 15–16 – #212 of 351 · 20.26
2013–14 23–11 – #110 of 351 · 62.72
2012–13 17–14 – #145 of 347 · 40.31
2011–12 18–14 – #181 of 345 · 30.68
2010–11 20–14 – #151 of 346 · 42.88
2009–10 17–15 – #185 of 335 · 27.89
2008–09 11–21 – #268 of 330 · -12.85
2007–08 15–16 – #176 of 328 · 28.31
2006–07 13–18 – #211 of 326 · 12.77
2005–06 13–16 – #233 of 326 · 1.44
2004–05 11–21 – #229 of 326 · 7.30