The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

UC Riverside

Big West · 3–0

Power-6.4#244 of 365
Résumé+0.70#59 · wins above average
Movement+25up from #269 last week
Best winDenver (64–60)
Schedule faced-15.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-12.8 avg opponent
Returning production21% of last season's win shares · #184 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production3.3 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+18.6 avg× 27%+5.1
Opponents faced-15.7 avg× 27%-4.3
Preseason prior-9.9× 73%-7.2
Power-6.4

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs La Verne non-D1 W 110–47 +29.8 +33.2 +0.5
2 vs Denver W 64–60 +0.9 +3.1 -0.6
3 at San José State W 80–75 -3.1 +8.1 +0.9
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-7.2
Power-6.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Fresno State -2.0 43%
4 at San Diego -3.9 36%
5 vs Portland State +2.0 57%
5 vs Lincoln University (CA) non-D1 +29.8 100%

Season by season

Best finish: #120 in 2020–21. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #277 of 326 (9-19)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #318 of 326 (5-23)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #312 of 326 (7-24)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #286 of 328 (9-21)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #204 of 330 (17-13)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #217 of 335 (12-17)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #280 of 346 (12-19)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #276 of 345 (14-17)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #319 of 347 (4-24)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #286 of 351 (10-21)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #213 of 351 (14-17)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #226 of 351 (14-19)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #304 of 351 (7-21)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #297 of 351 (9-22)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #330 of 353 (7-23)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #210 of 353 (14-15)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 347 (14-8)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #170 of 358 (16-12)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #152 of 363 (22-12)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #226 of 362 (16-18)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #190 of 364 (21-13)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #276 of 365 (10-22) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 10–22 #276 of 365 · -8.42 –
2024–25 21–13 #190 of 364 · -1.79 –
2023–24 16–18 #226 of 362 · -4.18 –
2022–23 22–12 #152 of 363 · 1.06 –
2021–22 16–12 #170 of 358 · 0.09 –
2020–21 14–8 #120 of 347 · 4.19 –
2019–20 14–15 – #210 of 353 · 14.47
2018–19 7–23 – #330 of 353 · -54.92
2017–18 9–22 – #297 of 351 · -21.68
2016–17 7–21 – #304 of 351 · -27.16
2015–16 14–19 – #226 of 351 · 9.09
2014–15 14–17 – #213 of 351 · 18.94
2013–14 10–21 – #286 of 351 · -12.79
2012–13 4–24 – #319 of 347 · -55.44
2011–12 14–17 – #276 of 345 · -13.94
2010–11 12–19 – #280 of 346 · -17.74
2009–10 12–17 – #217 of 335 · 12.83
2008–09 17–13 – #204 of 330 · 19.78
2007–08 9–21 – #286 of 328 · -24.28
2006–07 7–24 – #312 of 326 · -49.21
2005–06 5–23 – #318 of 326 · -66.53
2004–05 9–19 – #277 of 326 · -18.67