The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Fresno State

Pac-12 · 2–1

Power-7.3#257 of 365
Résumé-0.04#189 · wins above average
Movement-6down from #251 last week
Best winGeorgia State (95–92)
Worst lossUC San Diego (65–81)
Schedule faced-9.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-6.8 avg opponent
Returning production0% of last season's win shares · #335 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production5.7 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-4.4 avg× 27%-1.2
Opponents faced-9.1 avg× 27%-2.5
Preseason prior-5.0× 73%-3.6
Power-7.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Fresno Pacific non-D1 W 88–79 +28.9 -19.9 -1.8
2 at UC San Diego L 65–81 -14.6 -1.4 -1.0
3 vs Georgia State W 95–92 +2.2 +0.8 -0.9
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-3.6
Power-7.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs UC Riverside +2.0 57%
4 at San José State -4.0 36%
4 vs Alabama State +11.9 86%
5 N South Alabama -2.7 40%
5 N South Dakota State -6.9 27%

Season by season

Best finish: #63 in 2018–19. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 300 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #177 of 326 (16-14)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #181 of 326 (15-13)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #93 of 326 (22-9)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #209 of 328 (13-19)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #225 of 330 (13-21)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #180 of 335 (15-18)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #179 of 346 (14-17)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #202 of 345 (13-20)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #204 of 347 (9-19)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #153 of 351 (21-18)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #234 of 351 (15-17)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #81 of 351 (25-10)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #108 of 351 (20-13)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #71 of 351 (21-11)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #63 of 353 (22-9)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #208 of 353 (10-19)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #211 of 347 (12-12)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 358 (23-13)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #153 of 363 (11-20)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #237 of 362 (12-21)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #299 of 364 (6-26)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #184 of 365 (13-19) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 13–19 #184 of 365 · -1.58 –
2024–25 6–26 #299 of 364 · -9.50 –
2023–24 12–21 #237 of 362 · -4.52 –
2022–23 11–20 #153 of 363 · 1.03 –
2021–22 23–13 #88 of 358 · 6.90 –
2020–21 12–12 #211 of 347 · -2.81 –
2019–20 10–19 – #208 of 353 · 14.65
2018–19 22–9 – #63 of 353 · 86.03
2017–18 21–11 – #71 of 351 · 91.82
2016–17 20–13 – #108 of 351 · 64.71
2015–16 25–10 – #81 of 351 · 81.96
2014–15 15–17 – #234 of 351 · 10.60
2013–14 21–18 – #153 of 351 · 43.54
2012–13 9–19 – #204 of 347 · 17.65
2011–12 13–20 – #202 of 345 · 19.53
2010–11 14–17 – #179 of 346 · 32.77
2009–10 15–18 – #180 of 335 · 30.90
2008–09 13–21 – #225 of 330 · 5.27
2007–08 13–19 – #209 of 328 · 13.21
2006–07 22–9 – #93 of 326 · 72.25
2005–06 15–13 – #181 of 326 · 28.75
2004–05 16–14 – #177 of 326 · 26.50