The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UT Martin

OVC · 22–11

Power-3.6#214 of 365
Résumé-1.55#527 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBradley (78–67)
Worst lossLittle Rock (65–67)
Schedule faced-9.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at UNLV W 86–81 -10.9 +15.9
2 vs Kentucky Christian non-D1 W 97–42 +37.0 +18.0
2 at Bradley W 78–67 -11.2 +22.2
3 at Florida State L 73–87 -15.0 +1.0
3 N Prairie View A&M W 69–68 +7.4 -6.4
3 N Southern Miss L 60–70 +0.5 -10.4
4 vs Brescia non-D1 W 75–50 +37.0 -12.0
5 vs Charleston Southern W 73–56 +5.0 +12.0
5 vs Alabama State W 74–64 +11.5 -1.5
6 at Southern Illinois L 54–83 -9.6 -19.4
6 vs Champion Christian non-D1 W 96–52 +37.0 +7.0
7 at Tennessee State L 71–78 -5.3 -1.7
7 at Tennessee Tech W 86–62 +4.4 +19.6
9 vs Western Illinois W 67–60 +20.7 -13.7
9 vs Eastern Illinois W 65–61 +10.7 -6.7
10 at Morehead State W 76–68 +2.1 +5.9
10 at Southern Indiana W 73–56 +8.8 +8.2
11 vs SIU Edwardsville W 65–59 +3.4 +2.6
11 vs Lindenwood W 69–55 +5.4 +8.6
12 at Southeast Missouri State L 50–66 -3.2 -12.8
13 at Eastern Illinois W 76–68 +5.2 +2.8
13 at Western Illinois W 84–44 +15.2 +24.8
14 vs Little Rock W 55–52 +8.6 -5.6
14 vs Southern Indiana W 76–54 +14.3 +7.7
14 vs Morehead State L 55–61 +7.6 -13.6
15 at Lindenwood L 74–75 -0.1 -0.9
15 at SIU Edwardsville W 81–76 -2.1 +7.1
16 vs Southeast Missouri State L 53–56 +2.3 -5.3
16 at Little Rock L 65–67 +3.1 -5.1
17 vs Tennessee Tech W 64–49 +9.8 +5.2
17 vs Tennessee State L 42–67 +0.2 -25.2
18 N Eastern Illinois W 66–63 +8.0 -5.0
18 N Tennessee State L 55–68 -2.5 -10.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #86 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #303 of 326 (6-21)2005–06: #214 of 326 (13-15)2006–07: #297 of 326 (8-23)2007–08: #187 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #86 of 330 (22-10)2009–10: #324 of 335 (4-25)2010–11: #301 of 346 (12-21)2011–12: #336 of 345 (4-27)2012–13: #331 of 347 (7-21)2013–14: #311 of 351 (8-23)2014–15: #134 of 351 (21-13)2015–16: #207 of 351 (20-15)2016–17: #172 of 351 (22-13)2017–18: #287 of 351 (10-21)2018–19: #283 of 353 (10-19)2019–20: #324 of 353 (7-20)2020–21: #337 of 347 (8-16)2021–22: #325 of 358 (8-22)2022–23: #271 of 363 (19-14)2023–24: #228 of 362 (21-11)2024–25: #270 of 364 (14-19)2025–26: #214 of 365 (22-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 214 of 365 22–11 -3.59 Power
2024–25 270 of 364 14–19 -7.09 Power
2023–24 228 of 362 21–11 -4.09 Power
2022–23 271 of 363 19–14 -6.66 Power
2021–22 325 of 358 8–22 -11.75 Power
2020–21 337 of 347 8–16 -16.19 Power
2019–20 324 of 353 7–20 -49.63 MRI
2018–19 283 of 353 10–19 -20.55 MRI
2017–18 287 of 351 10–21 -17.06 MRI
2016–17 172 of 351 22–13 38.02 MRI
2015–16 207 of 351 20–15 18.97 MRI
2014–15 134 of 351 21–13 52.13 MRI
2013–14 311 of 351 8–23 -33.81 MRI
2012–13 331 of 347 7–21 -67.79 MRI
2011–12 336 of 345 4–27 -78.43 MRI
2010–11 301 of 346 12–21 -30.44 MRI
2009–10 324 of 335 4–25 -69.09 MRI
2008–09 86 of 330 22–10 75.55 MRI
2007–08 187 of 328 17–16 22.59 MRI
2006–07 297 of 326 8–23 -35.74 MRI
2005–06 214 of 326 13–15 12.73 MRI
2004–05 303 of 326 6–21 -41.46 MRI