The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Southeast Missouri State

OVC · 20–13

Power-3.1#210 of 365
Résumé-2.70#575 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTennessee State (91–82)
Worst lossNorthern Arizona (72–79)
Schedule faced-8.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Saint Louis L 67–92 -22.4 -2.6
1 at Missouri L 84–89 -18.6 +13.6
2 vs Webster non-D1 W 87–41 +37.5 +8.5
2 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota L 72–84 -6.2 -5.8
3 at Iowa L 70–99 -23.6 -5.4
4 N Cal Poly W 84–68 +2.2 +13.8
4 at Northern Arizona L 72–79 +5.2 -12.2
4 vs Lipscomb L 77–88 -1.1 -9.9
5 vs Saint Mary of the Woods College non-D1 W 88–57 +37.5 -6.5
5 at Chattanooga W 74–70 -1.1 +5.1
6 vs St. Xavier (IL) non-D1 W 88–65 +37.5 -14.5
7 at Tennessee Tech L 74–85 +4.8 -15.8
7 at Tennessee State W 91–82 -4.8 +13.8
9 vs Eastern Illinois W 68–59 +11.1 -2.1
9 vs Western Illinois W 73–50 +21.1 +1.9
10 at Southern Indiana W 84–76 +9.3 -1.3
10 at Morehead State L 69–71 +2.6 -4.6
11 vs Lindenwood L 76–88 +5.8 -17.8
11 vs SIU Edwardsville L 55–68 +3.8 -16.8
12 vs UT Martin W 66–50 +3.2 +12.8
12 vs Little Rock W 70–65 +9.0 -4.0
13 at Western Illinois W 78–74 +15.6 -11.6
13 at Eastern Illinois W 77–59 +5.7 +12.3
14 vs Morehead State W 82–70 +8.0 +4.0
14 vs Southern Indiana W 90–65 +14.8 +10.2
15 at SIU Edwardsville L 56–74 -1.6 -16.4
15 at Lindenwood W 73–61 +0.4 +11.6
16 at UT Martin W 56–53 -2.3 +5.3
16 at Little Rock W 70–65 +3.6 +1.4
17 vs Tennessee State L 71–79 +0.6 -8.6
17 vs Tennessee Tech W 89–73 +10.3 +5.7
18 N Lindenwood W 68–66 +3.1 -1.1
18 N Morehead State L 61–66 +5.3 -10.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #158 in 2013–14. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #179 of 326 (15-14)2005–06: #291 of 326 (7-20)2006–07: #304 of 326 (11-20)2007–08: #291 of 328 (12-19)2008–09: #328 of 330 (3-27)2009–10: #306 of 335 (7-23)2010–11: #305 of 346 (10-22)2011–12: #206 of 345 (15-16)2012–13: #203 of 347 (15-16)2013–14: #158 of 351 (18-14)2014–15: #227 of 351 (13-17)2015–16: #337 of 351 (5-24)2016–17: #234 of 351 (15-18)2017–18: #252 of 351 (14-17)2018–19: #304 of 353 (8-21)2019–20: #335 of 353 (5-24)2020–21: #295 of 347 (11-16)2021–22: #266 of 358 (14-18)2022–23: #250 of 363 (19-17)2023–24: #343 of 362 (9-22)2024–25: #212 of 364 (21-12)2025–26: #210 of 365 (20-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 210 of 365 20–13 -3.14 Power
2024–25 212 of 364 21–12 -2.88 Power
2023–24 343 of 362 9–22 -14.92 Power
2022–23 250 of 363 19–17 -5.14 Power
2021–22 266 of 358 14–18 -6.74 Power
2020–21 295 of 347 11–16 -8.88 Power
2019–20 335 of 353 5–24 -62.83 MRI
2018–19 304 of 353 8–21 -32.96 MRI
2017–18 252 of 351 14–17 1.58 MRI
2016–17 234 of 351 15–18 10.68 MRI
2015–16 337 of 351 5–24 -62.55 MRI
2014–15 227 of 351 13–17 13.78 MRI
2013–14 158 of 351 18–14 41.73 MRI
2012–13 203 of 347 15–16 18.10 MRI
2011–12 206 of 345 15–16 18.58 MRI
2010–11 305 of 346 10–22 -33.55 MRI
2009–10 306 of 335 7–23 -43.39 MRI
2008–09 328 of 330 3–27 -103.19 MRI
2007–08 291 of 328 12–19 -27.38 MRI
2006–07 304 of 326 11–20 -41.06 MRI
2005–06 291 of 326 7–20 -29.78 MRI
2004–05 179 of 326 15–14 26.20 MRI