The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Utah State

Mountain West · 29–7

Power+18.0#27 of 365
Résumé+16.51#19 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winVillanova (86–76)
Worst lossUNLV (76–86)
Schedule faced+5.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Westminster (UT) non-D1 W 110–54 +58.6 -2.6
1 N VCU W 80–77 +2.9 +0.1
2 vs Weber State W 83–73 +24.0 -14.0
2 vs UTEP W 75–51 +27.1 -3.1
3 N Tulane W 96–75 +21.7 -0.7
4 N Davidson W 94–60 +15.0 +19.0
4 vs Montana State W 84–81 +19.1 -16.1
5 at South Florida L 61–74 +2.8 -15.8
5 at Charlotte W 79–53 +18.2 +7.8
6 N Illinois State W 83–78 +11.3 -6.3
7 vs Colorado State W 100–58 +12.1 +29.9
9 at Fresno State W 72–63 +16.5 -7.5
9 vs San José State W 96–78 +26.5 -8.5
10 at Air Force W 99–62 +33.6 +3.4
10 at Boise State W 93–68 +4.4 +20.6
11 vs Nevada W 71–62 +11.1 -2.1
11 at Grand Canyon L 74–84 +4.8 -14.8
12 vs UNLV L 76–86 +16.2 -26.2
12 at Colorado State W 65–61 +6.7 -2.7
13 vs Wyoming W 94–62 +16.2 +15.8
13 vs San Diego State W 71–66 +7.0 -2.0
14 at New Mexico W 86–66 +0.2 +19.8
14 at Wyoming W 85–83 +10.8 -8.8
15 vs Fresno State W 91–78 +22.0 -9.0
15 vs Memphis W 99–75 +16.8 +7.2
16 vs Boise State W 75–56 +9.9 +9.1
16 at Nevada L 77–80 +5.7 -8.7
17 at San Diego State L 72–89 +1.6 -18.6
17 vs Grand Canyon W 74–69 +10.3 -5.3
18 at UNLV L 65–92 +10.7 -37.7
18 vs New Mexico W 94–90 +5.7 -1.7
19 N UNLV W 80–60 +13.5 +6.5
19 N Nevada W 79–66 +8.4 +4.6
19 N San Diego State W 73–62 +4.3 +6.7
20 N Villanova W 86–76 +2.5 +7.5
21 N Arizona L 66–78 -13.3 +1.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #10 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #13 of 326 (24-8)2005–06: #75 of 326 (23-9)2006–07: #98 of 326 (23-12)2007–08: #75 of 328 (24-11)2008–09: #27 of 330 (30-5)2009–10: #10 of 335 (27-8)2010–11: #14 of 346 (30-4)2011–12: #132 of 345 (17-15)2012–13: #82 of 347 (20-10)2013–14: #122 of 351 (18-14)2014–15: #180 of 351 (18-13)2015–16: #161 of 351 (16-15)2016–17: #164 of 351 (14-17)2017–18: #196 of 351 (17-17)2018–19: #18 of 353 (27-7)2019–20: #32 of 353 (24-8)2020–21: #23 of 347 (20-9)2021–22: #48 of 358 (18-16)2022–23: #24 of 363 (26-9)2023–24: #33 of 362 (28-7)2024–25: #43 of 364 (26-8)2025–26: #27 of 365 (29-7) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 27 of 365 29–7 18.03 Power
2024–25 43 of 364 26–8 13.40 Power
2023–24 33 of 362 28–7 13.59 Power
2022–23 24 of 363 26–9 14.26 Power
2021–22 48 of 358 18–16 10.74 Power
2020–21 23 of 347 20–9 13.32 Power
2019–20 32 of 353 24–8 108.07 MRI
2018–19 18 of 353 27–7 147.48 MRI
2017–18 196 of 351 17–17 26.49 MRI
2016–17 164 of 351 14–17 40.51 MRI
2015–16 161 of 351 16–15 46.75 MRI
2014–15 180 of 351 18–13 32.40 MRI
2013–14 122 of 351 18–14 58.65 MRI
2012–13 82 of 347 20–10 71.65 MRI
2011–12 132 of 345 17–15 51.29 MRI
2010–11 14 of 346 30–4 163.25 MRI
2009–10 10 of 335 27–8 158.49 MRI
2008–09 27 of 330 30–5 129.04 MRI
2007–08 75 of 328 24–11 82.01 MRI
2006–07 98 of 326 23–12 67.84 MRI
2005–06 75 of 326 23–9 83.48 MRI
2004–05 13 of 326 24–8 154.95 MRI