The MRI
2025–26 · Final

USC

Big Ten · 18–14

Power+8.7#75 of 365
Résumé+8.49#61 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWisconsin (73–71)
Worst lossOregon (70–71)
Schedule faced+8.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Cal Poly W 94–64 +16.8 +13.2
1 vs Manhattan W 114–83 +24.4 +6.6
2 N Illinois State W 87–67 +2.0 +18.0
3 vs Troy W 107–106 +7.9 -6.9
4 N Boise State W 70–67 -2.2 +5.2
4 N Seton Hall W 83–81 -1.5 +3.5
4 N Arizona State W 88–75 +0.4 +12.6
5 at Oregon W 82–77 -1.2 +6.2
5 vs Washington L 76–84 +0.6 -8.6
6 at San Diego W 94–81 +14.3 -1.3
7 vs Washington State W 68–61 +10.3 -3.3
7 vs UTSA W 97–70 +26.2 +0.8
7 vs UC Santa Cruz non-D1 W 102–63 +49.3 -10.3
9 at Michigan L 66–96 -26.6 -3.4
10 at Michigan State L 51–80 -18.3 -10.7
10 at Minnesota W 70–69 -1.1 +2.1
11 vs Maryland W 88–71 +6.2 +10.8
11 vs Purdue L 64–69 -14.1 +9.1
12 vs Northwestern L 68–74 +1.1 -7.1
12 at Wisconsin W 73–71 -13.5 +15.5
13 at Iowa L 72–73 -11.8 +10.8
13 vs Rutgers W 78–75 +8.7 -5.7
14 vs Indiana W 81–75 -2.8 +8.8
14 at Penn State W 77–75 +3.5 -1.5
15 at Ohio State L 82–89 -11.6 +4.6
16 vs Illinois L 65–101 -15.1 -20.9
16 vs Oregon L 70–71 +4.3 -5.3
17 at UCLA L 62–81 -11.0 -8.0
17 vs Nebraska L 67–82 -9.5 -5.5
18 at Washington L 72–91 -4.8 -14.2
18 vs UCLA L 68–89 -5.6 -15.4
19 N Washington L 79–83 -2.1 -1.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #6 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #145 of 326 (13-16)2005–06: #141 of 326 (17-13)2006–07: #57 of 326 (25-12)2007–08: #67 of 328 (21-12)2008–09: #46 of 330 (22-13)2009–10: #97 of 335 (16-14)2010–11: #75 of 346 (19-15)2011–12: #288 of 345 (6-25)2012–13: #197 of 347 (14-18)2013–14: #246 of 351 (11-21)2014–15: #230 of 351 (12-20)2015–16: #68 of 351 (21-13)2016–17: #52 of 351 (26-10)2017–18: #38 of 351 (24-12)2018–19: #109 of 353 (16-17)2019–20: #63 of 353 (22-9)2020–21: #6 of 347 (25-8)2021–22: #29 of 358 (26-8)2022–23: #43 of 363 (22-11)2023–24: #79 of 362 (15-18)2024–25: #64 of 364 (17-18)2025–26: #75 of 365 (18-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 75 of 365 18–14 8.74 Power
2024–25 64 of 364 17–18 9.94 Power
2023–24 79 of 362 15–18 7.89 Power
2022–23 43 of 363 22–11 11.76 Power
2021–22 29 of 358 26–8 13.38 Power
2020–21 6 of 347 25–8 17.53 Power
2019–20 63 of 353 22–9 85.60 MRI
2018–19 109 of 353 16–17 59.76 MRI
2017–18 38 of 351 24–12 118.81 MRI
2016–17 52 of 351 26–10 99.65 MRI
2015–16 68 of 351 21–13 95.34 MRI
2014–15 230 of 351 12–20 12.35 MRI
2013–14 246 of 351 11–21 5.95 MRI
2012–13 197 of 347 14–18 19.87 MRI
2011–12 288 of 345 6–25 -22.00 MRI
2010–11 75 of 346 19–15 82.68 MRI
2009–10 97 of 335 16–14 70.16 MRI
2008–09 46 of 330 22–13 107.20 MRI
2007–08 67 of 328 21–12 88.72 MRI
2006–07 57 of 326 25–12 100.13 MRI
2005–06 141 of 326 17–13 41.08 MRI
2004–05 145 of 326 13–16 39.80 MRI