The MRI
2025–26 · Final

George Washington

A-10 · 19–16

Power+7.7#84 of 365
Résumé+2.87#118 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSouth Florida (99–95)
Worst lossDelaware (58–70)
Schedule faced+1.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Maine W 67–47 +23.1 -3.1
1 N South Florida W 99–95 -4.8 +8.8
2 vs American University W 107–67 +15.5 +24.5
2 vs Old Dominion W 96–73 +17.0 +6.0
3 vs UMBC W 89–52 +11.5 +25.5
3 N McNeese L 86–92 -2.2 -3.8
4 N Middle Tennessee W 92–79 +6.7 +6.3
4 N Murray State L 95–96 +4.2 -5.2
5 at Army W 84–70 +19.7 -5.7
5 vs William & Mary W 99–86 +9.6 +3.4
6 vs Delaware L 58–70 +19.6 -31.6
6 N Florida L 70–80 -21.4 +11.4
8 vs St. Mary's (MD) non-D1 W 97–40 +48.3 +8.7
9 at Richmond W 99–85 +4.9 +9.1
9 vs La Salle W 77–55 +16.4 +5.6
10 at Dayton L 72–79 -4.9 -2.1
10 vs Loyola Chicago W 101–66 +18.1 +16.9
11 vs Davidson L 79–84 +7.4 -12.4
12 at George Mason L 64–69 -1.9 -3.1
12 vs Richmond W 85–69 +10.4 +5.6
13 at Saint Louis L 76–79 -11.5 +8.5
13 vs Fordham L 65–79 +12.1 -26.1
14 at Saint Joseph's L 73–76 +0.8 -3.8
14 at Duquesne L 86–88 +3.0 -5.0
15 vs Rhode Island W 75–70 +9.2 -4.2
15 vs George Mason W 72–53 +3.5 +15.5
16 at VCU L 75–89 -10.1 -3.9
17 at La Salle W 104–77 +11.0 +16.0
17 vs Dayton L 66–68 +0.6 -2.6
18 vs St. Bonaventure W 91–82 +7.8 +1.2
18 at Loyola Chicago L 62–68 +12.7 -18.7
19 N Fordham W 66–62 +9.3 -5.3
19 N Saint Louis L 81–88 -8.7 +1.7
20 at Utah Valley W 79–78 -2.3 +3.3
21 at New Mexico L 61–86 -10.1 -14.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #20 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #36 of 326 (22-8)2005–06: #20 of 326 (27-3)2006–07: #75 of 326 (23-9)2007–08: #225 of 328 (9-17)2008–09: #221 of 330 (10-18)2009–10: #125 of 335 (16-15)2010–11: #164 of 346 (17-14)2011–12: #207 of 345 (10-21)2012–13: #124 of 347 (13-17)2013–14: #48 of 351 (24-9)2014–15: #87 of 351 (22-13)2015–16: #33 of 351 (28-10)2016–17: #141 of 351 (20-15)2017–18: #216 of 351 (15-18)2018–19: #311 of 353 (9-24)2019–20: #274 of 353 (12-20)2020–21: #282 of 347 (5-12)2021–22: #254 of 358 (12-18)2022–23: #228 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #225 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #141 of 364 (21-13)2025–26: #84 of 365 (19-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 84 of 365 19–16 7.74 Power
2024–25 141 of 364 21–13 1.72 Power
2023–24 225 of 362 15–17 -4.02 Power
2022–23 228 of 363 16–16 -3.90 Power
2021–22 254 of 358 12–18 -6.14 Power
2020–21 282 of 347 5–12 -7.84 Power
2019–20 274 of 353 12–20 -12.82 MRI
2018–19 311 of 353 9–24 -37.83 MRI
2017–18 216 of 351 15–18 18.85 MRI
2016–17 141 of 351 20–15 48.48 MRI
2015–16 33 of 351 28–10 126.02 MRI
2014–15 87 of 351 22–13 78.55 MRI
2013–14 48 of 351 24–9 104.80 MRI
2012–13 124 of 347 13–17 50.22 MRI
2011–12 207 of 345 10–21 18.22 MRI
2010–11 164 of 346 17–14 38.59 MRI
2009–10 125 of 335 16–15 55.13 MRI
2008–09 221 of 330 10–18 8.24 MRI
2007–08 225 of 328 9–17 4.59 MRI
2006–07 75 of 326 23–9 85.82 MRI
2005–06 20 of 326 27–3 122.31 MRI
2004–05 36 of 326 22–8 110.98 MRI