The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Utah Valley

UAC · 25–9

Power+7.3#86 of 365
Résumé+5.42#92 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUC Irvine (79–72)
Worst lossSouthern Utah (70–84)
Schedule faced-4.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs West Coast Baptist non-D1 W 116–35 +48.0 +33.0
1 at Boise State L 77–101 -6.3 -17.7
2 vs Westminster (UT) non-D1 W 91–60 +48.0 -17.0
2 at Fresno State L 74–75 +5.8 -6.8
3 vs UC Irvine W 79–72 +4.1 +2.9
4 N South Dakota State W 75–52 +8.5 +14.5
4 N Samford W 89–45 +6.5 +37.5
5 at San Diego State L 66–77 -9.1 -1.9
5 at Bowling Green W 82–71 +3.9 +7.1
6 vs Idaho State W 73–69 +16.4 -12.4
6 N UC Santa Barbara W 68–53 +6.7 +8.3
7 vs Weber State W 90–74 +13.3 +2.7
7 vs Bethesda University non-D1 W 109–48 +48.0 +13.0
9 vs California Baptist W 73–66 +6.3 +0.7
9 at Tarleton State W 91–85 +9.6 -3.6
9 at Abilene Christian L 68–85 +11.0 -28.0
10 vs Southern Utah W 89–72 +18.5 -1.5
10 vs Utah Tech W 92–76 +14.2 +1.8
11 vs UT Arlington W 86–74 +10.7 +1.3
12 at Southern Utah L 70–84 +13.0 -27.0
12 at California Baptist L 71–78 +0.9 -7.9
13 at Tarleton State W 83–55 +9.6 +18.4
14 vs Abilene Christian W 68–55 +16.4 -3.4
14 vs UT Arlington W 81–60 +10.7 +10.3
15 at Utah Tech L 77–81 +8.7 -12.7
16 vs California Baptist W 65–46 +6.3 +12.7
16 at UT Arlington W 66–54 +5.2 +6.8
17 vs Tarleton State W 79–72 +15.1 -8.1
17 vs Abilene Christian W 74–67 +16.4 -9.4
18 at Southern Utah W 92–88 +13.0 -9.0
18 at Utah Tech W 104–101 +8.7 -5.7
19 N UT Arlington W 67–65 +7.9 -5.9
19 N California Baptist L 61–63 +3.6 -5.6
20 vs George Washington L 78–79 +2.3 -3.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #53 in 2017–18. 17 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2009–10: #289 of 335 (12-18)2010–11: #157 of 346 (19-11)2011–12: #164 of 345 (20-11)2012–13: #283 of 347 (10-18)2013–14: #187 of 351 (20-12)2014–15: #304 of 351 (11-19)2015–16: #269 of 351 (12-18)2016–17: #153 of 351 (17-17)2017–18: #53 of 351 (23-10)2018–19: #81 of 353 (23-10)2019–20: #279 of 353 (8-19)2020–21: #195 of 347 (11-11)2021–22: #128 of 358 (20-12)2022–23: #58 of 363 (28-9)2023–24: #151 of 362 (16-16)2024–25: #101 of 364 (25-9)2025–26: #86 of 365 (25-9) 2009–10 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 86 of 365 25–9 7.35 Power
2024–25 101 of 364 25–9 5.18 Power
2023–24 151 of 362 16–16 1.55 Power
2022–23 58 of 363 28–9 10.07 Power
2021–22 128 of 358 20–12 3.66 Power
2020–21 195 of 347 11–11 -1.94 Power
2019–20 279 of 353 8–19 -16.21 MRI
2018–19 81 of 353 23–10 70.99 MRI
2017–18 53 of 351 23–10 103.75 MRI
2016–17 153 of 351 17–17 42.83 MRI
2015–16 269 of 351 12–18 -12.43 MRI
2014–15 304 of 351 11–19 -27.05 MRI
2013–14 187 of 351 20–12 31.44 MRI
2012–13 283 of 347 10–18 -24.71 MRI
2011–12 164 of 345 20–11 37.95 MRI
2010–11 157 of 346 19–11 40.99 MRI
2009–10 289 of 335 12–18 -23.35 MRI