The MRI
2025–26 · Final

East Carolina

American · 11–20

Power-7.4#271 of 365
Résumé-5.14#614 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFlorida Atlantic (76–75)
Worst lossUNC Greensboro (78–82)
Schedule faced-0.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Georgia Southern W 92–89 +0.4 +2.6
1 at Richmond L 72–87 -10.3 -4.7
2 vs Elizabeth City State non-D1 W 71–70 +33.2 -32.2
3 at UNC Wilmington L 60–85 -15.2 -9.8
3 vs Charleston Southern L 65–77 +1.2 -13.2
4 N Michigan State L 56–89 -31.8 -1.2
4 N St. Bonaventure L 58–67 -10.0 +1.0
5 vs Maryland Eastern Shore W 68–56 +10.8 +1.2
5 vs UNC Greensboro L 78–82 +2.8 -6.8
6 vs App State L 54–67 -3.9 -9.1
6 vs Buffalo W 73–70 +0.2 +2.8
7 vs Presbyterian W 74–53 +1.5 +19.5
8 at North Carolina L 51–99 -27.8 -20.2
9 vs Tulane L 70–79 -1.0 -8.0
10 at Temple L 67–75 -10.3 +2.3
10 vs UAB L 85–87 -9.0 +7.0
11 at South Florida L 71–82 -22.7 +11.7
11 vs Charlotte L 70–73 -1.8 -1.2
12 at Wichita State L 60–77 -18.7 +1.7
12 at North Texas W 63–59 -13.4 +17.4
13 vs Rice L 77–83 +0.5 -6.5
13 at Florida Atlantic W 76–75 -14.3 +15.3
14 vs Temple L 73–81 -4.8 -3.2
15 vs UTSA W 88–72 +10.0 +6.0
15 at Rice W 85–75 -4.9 +14.9
16 vs Wichita State L 89–92 -13.3 +10.3
16 at Charlotte L 56–68 -7.2 -4.8
17 at UTSA W 82–81 +4.5 -3.5
17 vs Memphis W 84–68 -8.6 +24.6
18 vs Tulsa L 66–93 -14.2 -12.8
18 at UAB L 83–90 -14.5 +7.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #152 in 2011–12. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #234 of 326 (8-19)2005–06: #262 of 326 (8-20)2006–07: #313 of 326 (6-24)2007–08: #265 of 328 (11-19)2008–09: #234 of 330 (13-17)2009–10: #288 of 335 (10-21)2010–11: #184 of 346 (18-16)2011–12: #152 of 345 (15-16)2012–13: #171 of 347 (14-12)2013–14: #204 of 351 (17-17)2014–15: #245 of 351 (14-19)2015–16: #241 of 351 (12-20)2016–17: #212 of 351 (15-18)2017–18: #315 of 351 (10-20)2018–19: #275 of 353 (10-21)2019–20: #243 of 353 (11-20)2020–21: #222 of 347 (8-11)2021–22: #206 of 358 (15-15)2022–23: #201 of 363 (16-17)2023–24: #200 of 362 (15-18)2024–25: #189 of 364 (19-14)2025–26: #271 of 365 (11-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 271 of 365 11–20 -7.42 Power
2024–25 189 of 364 19–14 -1.43 Power
2023–24 200 of 362 15–18 -2.66 Power
2022–23 201 of 363 16–17 -1.88 Power
2021–22 206 of 358 15–15 -2.33 Power
2020–21 222 of 347 8–11 -3.53 Power
2019–20 243 of 353 11–20 0.54 MRI
2018–19 275 of 353 10–21 -16.03 MRI
2017–18 315 of 351 10–20 -37.25 MRI
2016–17 212 of 351 15–18 19.66 MRI
2015–16 241 of 351 12–20 0.95 MRI
2014–15 245 of 351 14–19 4.82 MRI
2013–14 204 of 351 17–17 23.73 MRI
2012–13 171 of 347 14–12 28.54 MRI
2011–12 152 of 345 15–16 44.91 MRI
2010–11 184 of 346 18–16 31.53 MRI
2009–10 288 of 335 10–21 -22.73 MRI
2008–09 234 of 330 13–17 2.14 MRI
2007–08 265 of 328 11–19 -14.48 MRI
2006–07 313 of 326 6–24 -50.31 MRI
2005–06 262 of 326 8–20 -10.17 MRI
2004–05 234 of 326 8–19 3.73 MRI