The MRI
2025–26 · Final

App State

Sun Belt · 19–13

Power-0.8#178 of 365
Résumé-1.73#538 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winHigh Point (86–78)
Worst lossGeorgia State (63–70)
Schedule faced-6.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Central Michigan L 66–82 +3.7 -19.7
1 vs Carolina University non-D1 W 92–46 +39.8 +6.2
1 vs North Carolina Central W 76–54 +16.1 +5.9
2 at Ohio State L 53–75 -21.1 -0.9
2 at Dartmouth W 85–77 +2.8 +5.2
3 vs Charlotte W 65–63 +4.8 -2.8
4 vs Elon L 53–88 +6.6 -41.6
4 at Mercer L 67–75 -4.2 -3.8
4 N UNC Asheville L 55–67 +3.3 -15.3
5 vs Virginia-Lynchburg non-D1 W 133–45 +39.8 +48.2
6 at East Carolina W 67–54 +3.9 +9.1
6 N High Point W 86–78 -11.6 +19.6
7 vs Coastal Carolina W 67–49 +8.2 +9.8
7 vs Georgia State L 63–70 +11.9 -18.9
9 at Old Dominion W 81–73 +3.0 +5.0
9 at Marshall L 81–88 -2.4 -4.6
10 at Georgia State W 52–50 +6.4 -4.4
10 at Coastal Carolina L 62–67 +2.8 -7.8
11 vs James Madison W 80–65 +4.0 +11.0
11 vs Old Dominion L 73–75 +8.4 -10.4
12 vs Louisiana W 72–58 +13.9 +0.1
12 vs UL Monroe W 59–43 +20.8 -4.8
13 at Southern Miss W 70–63 +0.5 +6.5
13 at Troy W 66–44 -7.1 +29.1
14 vs South Alabama W 65–57 +1.8 +6.2
14 vs Eastern Michigan W 65–60 +8.3 -3.3
15 at Georgia Southern W 81–65 +1.6 +14.4
15 at James Madison L 58–69 -1.5 -9.5
16 vs Marshall L 93–94 +3.0 -4.0
16 vs Georgia Southern W 89–74 +7.1 +7.9
17 at Texas State L 57–60 +1.0 -4.0
18 N Southern Miss L 73–86 +3.2 -16.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #70 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #150 of 326 (18-12)2005–06: #222 of 326 (14-16)2006–07: #70 of 326 (25-8)2007–08: #144 of 328 (18-13)2008–09: #210 of 330 (13-18)2009–10: #74 of 335 (24-13)2010–11: #214 of 346 (16-15)2011–12: #250 of 345 (13-18)2012–13: #228 of 347 (13-16)2013–14: #295 of 351 (9-21)2014–15: #286 of 351 (12-17)2015–16: #299 of 351 (9-22)2016–17: #279 of 351 (9-21)2017–18: #214 of 351 (15-18)2018–19: #254 of 353 (8-21)2019–20: #194 of 353 (16-15)2020–21: #145 of 347 (17-12)2021–22: #142 of 358 (19-15)2022–23: #159 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #73 of 362 (27-7)2024–25: #146 of 364 (17-14)2025–26: #178 of 365 (19-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 178 of 365 19–13 -0.79 Power
2024–25 146 of 364 17–14 1.44 Power
2023–24 73 of 362 27–7 8.39 Power
2022–23 159 of 363 16–16 0.51 Power
2021–22 142 of 358 19–15 2.27 Power
2020–21 145 of 347 17–12 1.80 Power
2019–20 194 of 353 16–15 23.25 MRI
2018–19 254 of 353 8–21 -6.06 MRI
2017–18 214 of 351 15–18 21.19 MRI
2016–17 279 of 351 9–21 -11.87 MRI
2015–16 299 of 351 9–22 -26.07 MRI
2014–15 286 of 351 12–17 -16.51 MRI
2013–14 295 of 351 9–21 -23.04 MRI
2012–13 228 of 347 13–16 3.93 MRI
2011–12 250 of 345 13–18 -3.38 MRI
2010–11 214 of 346 16–15 17.45 MRI
2009–10 74 of 335 24–13 85.91 MRI
2008–09 210 of 330 13–18 18.29 MRI
2007–08 144 of 328 18–13 44.25 MRI
2006–07 70 of 326 25–8 89.88 MRI
2005–06 222 of 326 14–16 10.49 MRI
2004–05 150 of 326 18–12 38.24 MRI