The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Auburn

SEC · 22–16

Power+18.5#24 of 365
Résumé+12.88#34 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFlorida (76–67)
Worst lossMississippi State (85–91)
Schedule faced+12.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Bethune-Cookman W 95–90 +27.9 -22.9
1 vs Merrimack W 95–57 +21.6 +16.4
2 vs Wofford W 93–62 +23.8 +7.2
2 N Houston L 72–73 -9.6 +8.6
3 vs Jackson State W 112–66 +37.1 +8.9
4 N Oregon W 84–73 +11.3 -0.3
4 N Michigan L 72–102 -14.1 -15.9
4 N St. John's W 85–74 -4.9 +15.9
5 vs NC State W 83–73 +7.5 +2.5
5 at Arizona L 68–97 -15.6 -13.4
6 vs Chattanooga W 92–78 +26.0 -12.0
7 at Purdue L 60–88 -9.8 -18.2
9 vs Queens University W 106–65 +23.1 +17.9
9 at Georgia L 100–104 -0.7 -3.3
10 vs Texas A&M L 88–90 +5.6 -7.6
10 vs Arkansas W 95–73 +0.2 +21.8
11 at Missouri L 74–84 +3.1 -13.1
11 vs South Carolina W 71–67 +15.8 -11.8
12 at Ole Miss W 78–66 +6.0 +6.0
12 at Florida W 76–67 -13.3 +22.3
13 vs Texas W 88–82 +5.6 +0.4
13 at Tennessee L 69–77 -7.3 -0.7
14 vs Alabama L 92–96 -3.2 -0.8
15 vs Vanderbilt L 76–84 -0.4 -7.6
15 at Arkansas L 75–88 -5.2 -7.8
16 at Mississippi State L 85–91 +9.6 -15.6
16 vs Kentucky W 75–74 +3.1 -2.1
17 at Oklahoma L 79–91 +1.9 -13.9
17 vs Ole Miss L 79–85 +11.5 -17.5
18 vs LSU W 88–74 +11.7 +2.3
18 at Alabama L 84–96 -8.7 -3.3
19 N Mississippi State W 79–61 +12.4 +5.6
19 N Tennessee L 62–72 -4.6 -5.4
20 vs South Alabama W 78–67 +21.1 -10.1
20 vs Seattle U W 91–85 +17.2 -11.2
21 vs Nevada W 75–69 +11.6 -5.6
22 N Illinois State W 88–66 +11.8 +10.2
23 N Tulsa W 92–86 +9.0 -3.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2024–25. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #217 of 326 (13-17)2005–06: #148 of 326 (12-16)2006–07: #114 of 326 (17-15)2007–08: #161 of 328 (14-16)2008–09: #45 of 330 (24-12)2009–10: #136 of 335 (15-17)2010–11: #242 of 346 (11-20)2011–12: #154 of 345 (16-16)2012–13: #245 of 347 (9-23)2013–14: #172 of 351 (14-16)2014–15: #233 of 351 (15-20)2015–16: #292 of 351 (11-20)2016–17: #131 of 351 (18-14)2017–18: #15 of 351 (26-7)2018–19: #13 of 353 (29-10)2019–20: #14 of 353 (25-6)2020–21: #72 of 347 (13-14)2021–22: #14 of 358 (28-6)2022–23: #20 of 363 (21-13)2023–24: #5 of 362 (27-8)2024–25: #3 of 364 (32-6)2025–26: #24 of 365 (22-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 24 of 365 22–16 18.52 Power
2024–25 3 of 364 32–6 28.26 Power
2023–24 5 of 362 27–8 22.44 Power
2022–23 20 of 363 21–13 15.02 Power
2021–22 14 of 358 28–6 18.01 Power
2020–21 72 of 347 13–14 7.81 Power
2019–20 14 of 353 25–6 128.23 MRI
2018–19 13 of 353 29–10 159.24 MRI
2017–18 15 of 351 26–7 154.42 MRI
2016–17 131 of 351 18–14 53.60 MRI
2015–16 292 of 351 11–20 -23.39 MRI
2014–15 233 of 351 15–20 11.52 MRI
2013–14 172 of 351 14–16 36.34 MRI
2012–13 245 of 347 9–23 -5.74 MRI
2011–12 154 of 345 16–16 43.99 MRI
2010–11 242 of 346 11–20 0.96 MRI
2009–10 136 of 335 15–17 50.78 MRI
2008–09 45 of 330 24–12 107.82 MRI
2007–08 161 of 328 14–16 35.56 MRI
2006–07 114 of 326 17–15 58.69 MRI
2005–06 148 of 326 12–16 39.24 MRI
2004–05 217 of 326 13–17 13.00 MRI