Charlotte

American · 17–17

Power-2.9#209 of 365

Résumé-0.00#168 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winWichita State (104–100)
Worst lossUTSA (79–88)
Schedule faced-0.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Indiana State	W 92–76	+1.9	+14.2
1	vs	Tennessee Tech	W 70–65	+10.5	-5.5
2	vs	Davidson	L 55–62	-3.2	-3.8
2	at	Virginia Tech	L 76–84	-14.6	+6.6
3	at	App State	L 63–65	-4.8	+2.8
3	vs	Shaw non-D1	W 83–79	+37.7	-33.7
4	N	Illinois State	L 69–79	-9.7	-0.3
4	N	Richmond	L 66–71	-3.0	-2.0
5	vs	North Carolina A&T	W 74–57	+10.7	+6.3
5	vs	Utah State	L 53–79	-18.2	-7.8
6	at	Charleston	L 67–74	-6.0	-1.0
7	vs	Lafayette	W 81–67	+12.9	+1.1
7	vs	UIC	W 88–76	-4.2	+16.1
9	vs	Temple	L 73–76	-0.3	-2.7
9	vs	Wichita State	W 104–100	-8.7	+12.7
10	at	UTSA	W 74–58	+9.1	+6.9
10	at	Rice	W 74–73	-0.4	+1.4
11	vs	Tulsa	L 74–86	-9.7	-2.3
11	at	East Carolina	W 73–70	+1.8	+1.2
12	vs	Tulane	W 73–70	+3.5	-0.5
13	at	Temple	W 80–76	-5.7	+9.7
13	vs	Rice	W 80–70	+5.1	+4.9
14	at	Wichita State	L 64–74	-14.2	+4.2
14	at	Memphis	L 54–77	-9.6	-13.4
15	vs	UTSA	L 79–88	+14.5	-23.5
16	at	Tulsa	L 74–79	-15.2	+10.2
16	vs	East Carolina	W 68–56	+7.2	+4.8
17	vs	North Texas	W 80–79	-3.4	+4.4
17	at	Florida Atlantic	L 76–77	-9.8	+8.8
18	vs	UAB	L 74–80	-4.5	-1.5
18	at	South Florida	L 60–83	-18.2	-4.8
19	N	Tulane	W 74–60	+0.8	+13.2
19	N	UAB	W 83–78	-7.2	+12.2
19	N	South Florida	L 64–86	-15.5	-6.5

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #50 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	209 of 365	17–17	-2.90	Power
2024–25	242 of 364	11–22	-5.06	Power
2023–24	119 of 362	19–12	4.21	Power
2022–23	114 of 363	22–14	4.20	Power
2021–22	201 of 358	17–14	-1.92	Power
2020–21	229 of 347	9–16	-4.27	Power
2019–20	175 of 353	16–13	33.80	MRI
2018–19	307 of 353	8–21	-36.45	MRI
2017–18	324 of 351	6–23	-45.15	MRI
2016–17	271 of 351	13–17	-8.25	MRI
2015–16	182 of 351	14–19	31.01	MRI
2014–15	157 of 351	14–18	39.94	MRI
2013–14	142 of 351	17–14	46.51	MRI
2012–13	119 of 347	21–11	52.17	MRI
2011–12	191 of 345	13–17	25.05	MRI
2010–11	256 of 346	10–20	-5.74	MRI
2009–10	90 of 335	19–12	75.66	MRI
2008–09	201 of 330	11–20	21.62	MRI
2007–08	106 of 328	20–14	68.09	MRI
2006–07	148 of 326	14–16	39.60	MRI
2005–06	89 of 326	19–13	71.97	MRI
2004–05	50 of 326	21–8	97.96	MRI