The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Bucknell

Patriot · 0–3

Power-17.1#353 of 365
Résumé-0.84#454 · wins above average
Movement+1up from #354 last week
Worst lossOld Dominion (62–82)
Schedule faced+10.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-0.1 avg opponent
Returning production16% of last season's win shares · #220 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production0.1 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-32.1 avg× 27%-8.8
Opponents faced+10.0 avg× 27%+2.7
Preseason prior-15.2× 73%-11.0
Power-17.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Maryland L 67–96 -30.5 +1.5 -1.7
2 vs Old Dominion L 62–82 -11.8 -8.2 -3.5
3 at Virginia L 61–95 -42.0 +8.0 -0.9
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-11.0
Power-17.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Columbia -11.4 15%
4 vs Akron -25.6 1%
4 vs Siena -12.5 13%
5 at Cornell -16.6 7%
5 N La Salle -12.5 13%
5 at Pennsylvania -20.5 3%

Season by season

Best finish: #18 in 2005–06. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #76 of 326 (23-10)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #18 of 326 (27-5)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #77 of 326 (22-9)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #248 of 328 (12-19)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #307 of 330 (7-23)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #220 of 335 (14-17)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #88 of 346 (25-9)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #75 of 345 (22-10)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #34 of 347 (27-5)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #151 of 351 (16-14)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #192 of 351 (19-15)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #139 of 351 (17-14)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #46 of 351 (26-9)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #70 of 351 (25-10)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #117 of 353 (21-12)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #253 of 353 (14-20)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #262 of 347 (5-7)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #339 of 358 (9-23)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #301 of 363 (12-20)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #286 of 362 (14-19)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #226 of 364 (18-15)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #325 of 365 (10-23) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 10–23 #325 of 365 · -12.75 –
2024–25 18–15 #226 of 364 · -4.20 –
2023–24 14–19 #286 of 362 · -7.70 –
2022–23 12–20 #301 of 363 · -8.90 –
2021–22 9–23 #339 of 358 · -13.94 –
2020–21 5–7 #262 of 347 · -6.89 –
2019–20 14–20 – #253 of 353 · -1.74
2018–19 21–12 – #117 of 353 · 57.95
2017–18 25–10 – #70 of 351 · 92.04
2016–17 26–9 – #46 of 351 · 105.13
2015–16 17–14 – #139 of 351 · 53.86
2014–15 19–15 – #192 of 351 · 27.09
2013–14 16–14 – #151 of 351 · 44.33
2012–13 27–5 – #34 of 347 · 118.02
2011–12 22–10 – #75 of 345 · 86.32
2010–11 25–9 – #88 of 346 · 76.77
2009–10 14–17 – #220 of 335 · 10.55
2008–09 7–23 – #307 of 330 · -45.77
2007–08 12–19 – #248 of 328 · -6.44
2006–07 22–9 – #77 of 326 · 83.61
2005–06 27–5 – #18 of 326 · 124.30
2004–05 23–10 – #76 of 326 · 74.93