The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Siena

Metro · 23–12

Power-0.8#179 of 365
Résumé-0.48#279 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winMerrimack (64–54)
Worst lossSacred Heart (80–86)
Schedule faced-5.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Bryant W 82–66 +14.3 +1.7
1 at Brown W 62–46 +4.1 +11.9
2 at St. Bonaventure L 66–75 -6.2 -2.8
3 vs Colgate L 69–72 +5.8 -8.8
3 vs UAlbany W 73–63 +11.4 -1.4
4 at Holy Cross W 73–69 +9.8 -5.8
4 N Longwood W 70–63 +3.8 +3.2
4 at American University W 59–55 +1.4 +2.6
4 N Maine W 64–60 +11.8 -7.8
5 vs Niagara W 83–54 +16.4 +12.6
5 vs Canisius W 74–52 +18.3 +3.7
7 at Vermont L 69–83 -1.1 -12.9
8 at Indiana L 60–81 -17.8 -3.2
9 at Iona L 72–75 +1.2 -4.2
9 at Rider W 74–65 +14.4 -5.4
10 vs Merrimack L 59–63 +2.3 -6.3
10 at Mount St. Mary's W 67–50 +3.8 +13.2
11 vs Sacred Heart L 80–86 +10.1 -16.1
11 at Manhattan W 74–59 +9.3 +5.7
12 vs Fairfield W 85–77 +8.3 -0.3
12 vs Marist W 69–50 +3.4 +15.6
13 at Niagara W 82–79 +10.9 -7.9
13 at Canisius W 78–63 +12.9 +2.1
14 vs Iona W 79–72 +6.7 +0.3
14 at Saint Peter's L 65–70 +1.5 -6.5
15 vs Quinnipiac L 62–74 +3.5 -15.5
15 at Marist W 67–63 -2.1 +6.1
16 at Merrimack L 72–79 -3.2 -3.8
16 vs Saint Peter's W 72–63 +7.0 +2.0
17 at Fairfield L 58–72 +2.9 -16.9
17 vs Rider W 76–61 +19.9 -4.9
18 N Mount St. Mary's W 63–58 +6.6 -1.6
19 N Fairfield W 76–61 +5.6 +9.4
19 N Merrimack W 64–54 -0.4 +10.4
20 N Duke L 65–71 -32.6 +26.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #33 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #302 of 326 (6-24)2005–06: #156 of 326 (15-13)2006–07: #121 of 326 (20-12)2007–08: #64 of 328 (23-11)2008–09: #35 of 330 (27-8)2009–10: #33 of 335 (27-7)2010–11: #209 of 346 (13-18)2011–12: #240 of 345 (14-16)2012–13: #318 of 347 (8-24)2013–14: #180 of 351 (20-18)2014–15: #269 of 351 (11-20)2015–16: #93 of 351 (21-13)2016–17: #163 of 351 (17-17)2017–18: #313 of 351 (8-24)2018–19: #223 of 353 (17-16)2019–20: #98 of 353 (20-10)2020–21: #160 of 347 (12-5)2021–22: #251 of 358 (15-14)2022–23: #213 of 363 (17-15)2023–24: #355 of 362 (4-28)2024–25: #281 of 364 (14-18)2025–26: #179 of 365 (23-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 179 of 365 23–12 -0.84 Power
2024–25 281 of 364 14–18 -7.89 Power
2023–24 355 of 362 4–28 -17.78 Power
2022–23 213 of 363 17–15 -2.70 Power
2021–22 251 of 358 15–14 -5.79 Power
2020–21 160 of 347 12–5 0.50 Power
2019–20 98 of 353 20–10 68.05 MRI
2018–19 223 of 353 17–16 5.86 MRI
2017–18 313 of 351 8–24 -34.89 MRI
2016–17 163 of 351 17–17 40.65 MRI
2015–16 93 of 351 21–13 76.49 MRI
2014–15 269 of 351 11–20 -6.24 MRI
2013–14 180 of 351 20–18 33.60 MRI
2012–13 318 of 347 8–24 -52.12 MRI
2011–12 240 of 345 14–16 3.68 MRI
2010–11 209 of 346 13–18 21.30 MRI
2009–10 33 of 335 27–7 129.13 MRI
2008–09 35 of 330 27–8 118.92 MRI
2007–08 64 of 328 23–11 91.65 MRI
2006–07 121 of 326 20–12 53.94 MRI
2005–06 156 of 326 15–13 35.51 MRI
2004–05 302 of 326 6–24 -38.43 MRI