The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Maryland

Big Ten · 12–21

Power+5.3#102 of 365
Résumé+3.35#112 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIowa (77–70)
Worst lossRutgers (57–68)
Schedule faced+10.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Coppin State W 83–61 +28.4 -6.4
1 vs Georgetown L 60–70 +1.1 -11.1
2 vs Alcorn State W 84–64 +25.8 -5.8
2 at Marquette W 89–82 -6.3 +13.3
3 vs Mount St. Mary's W 95–90 +15.4 -10.4
4 N UNLV W 74–67 +0.7 +6.3
4 N Gonzaga L 61–100 -19.5 -19.5
4 N Alabama L 72–105 -19.2 -13.8
5 vs Wagner W 89–63 +18.7 +7.3
5 at Iowa L 64–83 -15.2 -3.8
6 vs Michigan L 83–101 -24.6 +6.6
7 at Virginia L 72–80 -15.7 +7.7
8 vs Old Dominion W 73–58 +14.5 +0.5
9 vs Oregon L 54–64 +0.9 -10.8
10 vs Indiana L 66–84 -6.2 -11.8
10 at UCLA L 55–67 -14.5 +2.5
11 at USC L 71–88 -6.2 -10.8
11 vs Penn State W 96–73 +5.5 +17.5
12 at Illinois L 70–89 -24.0 +5.0
12 at Michigan State L 48–91 -21.8 -21.2
13 vs Purdue L 63–93 -17.6 -12.4
14 vs Ohio State L 62–82 -9.6 -10.4
14 at Minnesota W 67–62 -4.5 +9.5
15 vs Iowa W 77–70 -9.8 +16.8
15 at Rutgers L 57–68 -0.2 -10.8
16 at Northwestern L 74–78 -7.8 +3.8
16 vs Washington W 64–60 -2.8 +6.8
17 at Nebraska L 61–74 -18.4 +5.4
17 vs Rutgers L 65–69 +5.3 -9.3
18 at Wisconsin L 45–78 -16.9 -16.1
18 vs Illinois L 72–78 -18.6 +12.6
19 N Oregon W 70–60 -1.9 +11.9
19 N Iowa L 64–75 -12.5 +1.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #31 of 326 (19-12)2005–06: #55 of 326 (19-13)2006–07: #11 of 326 (25-9)2007–08: #101 of 328 (19-15)2008–09: #65 of 330 (21-14)2009–10: #24 of 335 (24-9)2010–11: #47 of 346 (19-14)2011–12: #162 of 345 (17-15)2012–13: #54 of 347 (22-12)2013–14: #77 of 351 (17-15)2014–15: #51 of 351 (28-7)2015–16: #29 of 351 (27-9)2016–17: #69 of 351 (24-9)2017–18: #69 of 351 (19-13)2018–19: #33 of 353 (23-11)2019–20: #18 of 353 (24-7)2020–21: #53 of 347 (17-14)2021–22: #86 of 358 (15-17)2022–23: #33 of 363 (22-13)2023–24: #60 of 362 (16-17)2024–25: #14 of 364 (27-9)2025–26: #102 of 365 (12-21) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 102 of 365 12–21 5.29 Power
2024–25 14 of 364 27–9 20.27 Power
2023–24 60 of 362 16–17 10.23 Power
2022–23 33 of 363 22–13 13.07 Power
2021–22 86 of 358 15–17 7.34 Power
2020–21 53 of 347 17–14 9.69 Power
2019–20 18 of 353 24–7 118.92 MRI
2018–19 33 of 353 23–11 116.72 MRI
2017–18 69 of 351 19–13 92.18 MRI
2016–17 69 of 351 24–9 86.90 MRI
2015–16 29 of 351 27–9 128.72 MRI
2014–15 51 of 351 28–7 99.40 MRI
2013–14 77 of 351 17–15 81.17 MRI
2012–13 54 of 347 22–12 98.42 MRI
2011–12 162 of 345 17–15 39.61 MRI
2010–11 47 of 346 19–14 107.06 MRI
2009–10 24 of 335 24–9 141.37 MRI
2008–09 65 of 330 21–14 92.23 MRI
2007–08 101 of 328 19–15 69.32 MRI
2006–07 11 of 326 25–9 154.97 MRI
2005–06 55 of 326 19–13 94.62 MRI
2004–05 31 of 326 19–12 113.77 MRI