The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Virginia

ACC · 30–6

Power+18.3#25 of 365
Résumé+18.31#14 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLouisville (79–70)
Worst lossButler (73–80)
Schedule faced+7.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Rider W 87–53 +39.0 -5.0
1 vs North Carolina Central W 81–62 +35.1 -16.1
2 vs Hampton W 91–53 +28.2 +9.8
2 vs Marshall W 104–78 +22.1 +3.9
3 N Northwestern W 83–78 +7.9 -2.9
3 N Butler L 73–80 +10.9 -17.9
4 vs Queens University W 94–69 +22.9 +2.1
5 at Texas W 88–69 -0.1 +19.1
5 N Dayton W 86–73 +8.4 +4.6
6 vs Maryland Eastern Shore W 84–60 +36.5 -12.5
7 vs Maryland W 80–72 +15.7 -7.7
8 vs American University W 95–51 +26.0 +18.0
9 at Virginia Tech L 85–95 +6.6 -16.6
9 at NC State W 76–61 +1.8 +13.2
10 vs California W 84–60 +13.9 +10.1
10 vs Stanford W 70–55 +12.0 +3.0
11 at Louisville W 79–70 -4.4 +13.4
11 at SMU W 72–68 +1.6 +2.4
12 vs North Carolina L 80–85 +3.3 -8.3
13 at Notre Dame W 100–97 +10.5 -7.5
13 at Boston College W 73–66 +17.2 -10.2
14 vs Pittsburgh W 67–47 +15.4 +4.6
14 vs Syracuse W 72–59 +15.0 -2.0
15 at Florida State W 61–58 +6.8 -3.8
15 N Ohio State W 70–66 +0.7 +3.3
16 at Georgia Tech W 94–68 +16.8 +9.2
16 vs Miami W 86–83 +7.5 -4.5
17 vs NC State W 90–61 +7.2 +21.8
17 at Duke L 51–77 -16.3 -9.7
18 vs Wake Forest W 75–70 +12.2 -7.2
18 vs Virginia Tech W 76–72 +12.0 -8.0
19 N NC State W 81–74 +4.5 +2.5
19 N Miami W 84–62 +4.8 +17.2
19 N Duke L 70–74 -13.5 +9.5
20 N Wright State W 82–73 +16.1 -7.1
20 N Tennessee L 72–79 -4.8 -2.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #162 of 326 (13-15)2005–06: #107 of 326 (15-15)2006–07: #65 of 326 (21-11)2007–08: #104 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #151 of 330 (10-18)2009–10: #99 of 335 (15-16)2010–11: #165 of 346 (16-15)2011–12: #43 of 345 (22-10)2012–13: #43 of 347 (21-11)2013–14: #5 of 351 (30-7)2014–15: #7 of 351 (30-4)2015–16: #7 of 351 (29-8)2016–17: #17 of 351 (23-11)2017–18: #5 of 351 (31-3)2018–19: #3 of 353 (35-3)2019–20: #75 of 353 (23-7)2020–21: #30 of 347 (18-7)2021–22: #75 of 358 (21-14)2022–23: #37 of 363 (25-8)2023–24: #68 of 362 (23-11)2024–25: #113 of 364 (15-17)2025–26: #25 of 365 (30-6) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 25 of 365 30–6 18.28 Power
2024–25 113 of 364 15–17 3.69 Power
2023–24 68 of 362 23–11 9.15 Power
2022–23 37 of 363 25–8 12.73 Power
2021–22 75 of 358 21–14 8.43 Power
2020–21 30 of 347 18–7 12.15 Power
2019–20 75 of 353 23–7 81.80 MRI
2018–19 3 of 353 35–3 213.65 MRI
2017–18 5 of 351 31–3 195.98 MRI
2016–17 17 of 351 23–11 156.78 MRI
2015–16 7 of 351 29–8 183.24 MRI
2014–15 7 of 351 30–4 196.75 MRI
2013–14 5 of 351 30–7 185.68 MRI
2012–13 43 of 347 21–11 105.15 MRI
2011–12 43 of 345 22–10 107.73 MRI
2010–11 165 of 346 16–15 37.59 MRI
2009–10 99 of 335 15–16 68.33 MRI
2008–09 151 of 330 10–18 40.12 MRI
2007–08 104 of 328 17–16 68.81 MRI
2006–07 65 of 326 21–11 95.12 MRI
2005–06 107 of 326 15–15 59.70 MRI
2004–05 162 of 326 13–15 32.03 MRI