The MRI
2025–26 · Final

BYU

Big 12 · 23–12

Power+19.2#22 of 365
Résumé+13.99#25 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIowa State (79–69)
Worst lossOklahoma State (92–99)
Schedule faced+11.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Villanova W 71–66 +3.7 +1.3
1 vs Holy Cross W 98–53 +35.3 +9.7
2 vs Delaware W 85–68 +31.0 -14.0
2 N UConn L 84–86 -5.1 +3.1
3 vs Wisconsin W 98–70 +2.5 +25.5
4 N Miami W 72–62 +5.7 +4.3
4 N Dayton W 83–79 +9.3 -5.3
5 vs California Baptist W 91–60 +18.2 +12.8
6 vs Clemson W 67–64 +6.1 -3.1
6 vs UC Riverside W 100–53 +29.0 +18.0
7 vs Pacific W 93–57 +21.7 +14.3
7 vs Abilene Christian W 85–67 +28.3 -10.3
8 vs Eastern Washington W 109–81 +25.3 +2.7
9 at Kansas State W 83–73 +11.5 -1.5
10 vs Arizona State W 104–76 +13.6 +14.4
10 at Utah W 89–84 +13.6 -8.6
11 vs TCU W 76–70 +9.0 -3.0
11 at Texas Tech L 71–84 -5.0 -8.0
12 vs Utah W 91–78 +19.0 -6.0
13 vs Arizona L 83–86 -9.4 +6.4
13 at Kansas L 82–90 -3.8 -4.2
14 at Oklahoma State L 92–99 +8.7 -15.7
14 vs Houston L 66–77 -6.2 -4.8
15 at Baylor W 99–94 +3.0 +2.0
15 vs Colorado W 90–86 +13.4 -9.4
16 at Arizona L 68–75 -14.9 +7.9
16 vs Iowa State W 79–69 -4.7 +14.7
17 vs UCF L 84–97 +10.6 -23.6
17 at West Virginia L 71–79 +4.7 -12.7
18 at Cincinnati L 68–90 +2.1 -24.1
18 vs Texas Tech W 82–76 +0.4 +5.6
19 N Kansas State W 105–91 +14.3 -0.3
19 N West Virginia W 68–48 +7.4 +12.6
19 N Houston L 66–73 -8.9 +1.9
20 N Texas L 71–79 +3.5 -11.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #5 in 2010–11. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #203 of 326 (9-21)2005–06: #84 of 326 (20-9)2006–07: #22 of 326 (25-9)2007–08: #27 of 328 (27-8)2008–09: #19 of 330 (25-8)2009–10: #7 of 335 (30-6)2010–11: #5 of 346 (32-5)2011–12: #23 of 345 (26-9)2012–13: #52 of 347 (20-11)2013–14: #38 of 351 (23-12)2014–15: #26 of 351 (25-10)2015–16: #26 of 351 (26-11)2016–17: #47 of 351 (22-12)2017–18: #54 of 351 (24-11)2018–19: #86 of 353 (19-13)2019–20: #15 of 353 (23-8)2020–21: #10 of 347 (20-7)2021–22: #36 of 358 (24-11)2022–23: #70 of 363 (19-15)2023–24: #18 of 362 (23-11)2024–25: #22 of 364 (26-10)2025–26: #22 of 365 (23-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 22 of 365 23–12 19.21 Power
2024–25 22 of 364 26–10 17.81 Power
2023–24 18 of 362 23–11 16.30 Power
2022–23 70 of 363 19–15 9.29 Power
2021–22 36 of 358 24–11 11.94 Power
2020–21 10 of 347 20–7 16.50 Power
2019–20 15 of 353 23–8 127.25 MRI
2018–19 86 of 353 19–13 70.15 MRI
2017–18 54 of 351 24–11 103.43 MRI
2016–17 47 of 351 22–12 104.74 MRI
2015–16 26 of 351 26–11 135.13 MRI
2014–15 26 of 351 25–10 129.98 MRI
2013–14 38 of 351 23–12 117.43 MRI
2012–13 52 of 347 20–11 101.42 MRI
2011–12 23 of 345 26–9 137.44 MRI
2010–11 5 of 346 32–5 194.74 MRI
2009–10 7 of 335 30–6 176.64 MRI
2008–09 19 of 330 25–8 145.58 MRI
2007–08 27 of 328 27–8 134.48 MRI
2006–07 22 of 326 25–9 132.51 MRI
2005–06 84 of 326 20–9 75.99 MRI
2004–05 203 of 326 9–21 18.24 MRI