Washington
Big Ten · 16–17
Power+10.8#57 of 365
Résumé+6.75#78 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winOhio State (81–74)
Worst lossPenn State (60–63)
Schedule faced+9.6 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | Arkansas-Pine Bluff | W 94–50 | +28.6 | +15.4 |
| 1 | vs | Denver | W 84–70 | +19.1 | -5.1 |
| 2 | at | Baylor | L 69–78 | -5.4 | -3.6 |
| 2 | at | Washington State | W 81–69 | +6.9 | +5.1 |
| 3 | vs | Southern | W 99–93 | +21.1 | -15.1 |
| 4 | N | Nevada | W 83–66 | +1.2 | +15.8 |
| 4 | N | Colorado | L 68–81 | +2.2 | -15.2 |
| 5 | vs | UCLA | L 80–82 | -3.5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | at | USC | W 84–76 | -0.6 | +8.6 |
| 6 | vs | Southern Utah | W 105–69 | +21.9 | +14.1 |
| 7 | at | Seattle U | L 66–70 | +4.0 | -8.0 |
| 8 | vs | San Diego | W 86–56 | +21.8 | +8.2 |
| 9 | vs | Utah | W 74–65 | +10.7 | -1.7 |
| 10 | at | Indiana | L 80–90 | -6.1 | -3.9 |
| 10 | at | Purdue | L 73–81 | -17.5 | +9.5 |
| 10 | vs | Ohio State | W 81–74 | -4.0 | +11.0 |
| 11 | vs | Michigan | L 72–82 | -19.0 | +9.0 |
| 11 | vs | Michigan State | L 63–80 | -10.8 | -6.2 |
| 12 | at | Nebraska | L 66–76 | -12.9 | +2.9 |
| 12 | vs | Oregon | W 72–57 | +6.4 | +8.6 |
| 13 | at | Illinois | L 66–75 | -18.5 | +9.5 |
| 13 | at | Northwestern | W 76–62 | -2.3 | +16.3 |
| 14 | vs | Iowa | L 74–84 | -4.2 | -5.8 |
| 14 | at | UCLA | L 73–77 | -9.0 | +5.0 |
| 15 | vs | Penn State | L 60–63 | +11.0 | -14.0 |
| 15 | vs | Minnesota | W 69–57 | +6.5 | +5.5 |
| 16 | at | Maryland | L 60–64 | +2.8 | -6.8 |
| 17 | at | Rutgers | W 79–72 | +5.3 | +1.7 |
| 17 | vs | Wisconsin | L 73–90 | -5.9 | -11.1 |
| 18 | vs | USC | W 91–72 | +4.8 | +14.2 |
| 18 | at | Oregon | L 79–85 | +0.9 | -6.9 |
| 19 | N | USC | W 83–79 | +2.1 | +1.9 |
| 19 | N | Wisconsin | L 82–85 | -8.6 | +5.6 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #5 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 57 of 365 | 16–17 | 10.83 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 121 of 364 | 13–18 | 3.28 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 69 of 362 | 17–15 | 8.96 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 131 of 363 | 16–16 | 3.12 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 150 of 358 | 17–15 | 1.84 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 215 of 347 | 5–21 | -2.78 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 91 of 353 | 15–16 | 72.64 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 42 of 353 | 27–9 | 102.51 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 113 of 351 | 21–11 | 64.41 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 214 of 351 | 9–22 | 19.01 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 88 of 351 | 19–15 | 77.71 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 164 of 351 | 16–15 | 37.51 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 130 of 351 | 17–15 | 52.19 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 85 of 347 | 18–15 | 68.82 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 49 of 345 | 24–11 | 105.09 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 10 of 346 | 24–11 | 172.25 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 14 of 335 | 26–10 | 150.31 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 15 of 330 | 26–9 | 159.64 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 90 of 328 | 16–17 | 72.67 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 55 of 326 | 19–13 | 101.08 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 12 of 326 | 26–7 | 147.84 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 5 of 326 | 29–6 | 168.83 | MRI |