The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Washington

Big Ten · 16–17

Power+10.8#57 of 365
Résumé+6.75#78 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winOhio State (81–74)
Worst lossPenn State (60–63)
Schedule faced+9.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 94–50 +28.6 +15.4
1 vs Denver W 84–70 +19.1 -5.1
2 at Baylor L 69–78 -5.4 -3.6
2 at Washington State W 81–69 +6.9 +5.1
3 vs Southern W 99–93 +21.1 -15.1
4 N Nevada W 83–66 +1.2 +15.8
4 N Colorado L 68–81 +2.2 -15.2
5 vs UCLA L 80–82 -3.5 +1.5
5 at USC W 84–76 -0.6 +8.6
6 vs Southern Utah W 105–69 +21.9 +14.1
7 at Seattle U L 66–70 +4.0 -8.0
8 vs San Diego W 86–56 +21.8 +8.2
9 vs Utah W 74–65 +10.7 -1.7
10 at Indiana L 80–90 -6.1 -3.9
10 at Purdue L 73–81 -17.5 +9.5
10 vs Ohio State W 81–74 -4.0 +11.0
11 vs Michigan L 72–82 -19.0 +9.0
11 vs Michigan State L 63–80 -10.8 -6.2
12 at Nebraska L 66–76 -12.9 +2.9
12 vs Oregon W 72–57 +6.4 +8.6
13 at Illinois L 66–75 -18.5 +9.5
13 at Northwestern W 76–62 -2.3 +16.3
14 vs Iowa L 74–84 -4.2 -5.8
14 at UCLA L 73–77 -9.0 +5.0
15 vs Penn State L 60–63 +11.0 -14.0
15 vs Minnesota W 69–57 +6.5 +5.5
16 at Maryland L 60–64 +2.8 -6.8
17 at Rutgers W 79–72 +5.3 +1.7
17 vs Wisconsin L 73–90 -5.9 -11.1
18 vs USC W 91–72 +4.8 +14.2
18 at Oregon L 79–85 +0.9 -6.9
19 N USC W 83–79 +2.1 +1.9
19 N Wisconsin L 82–85 -8.6 +5.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #5 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #5 of 326 (29-6)2005–06: #12 of 326 (26-7)2006–07: #55 of 326 (19-13)2007–08: #90 of 328 (16-17)2008–09: #15 of 330 (26-9)2009–10: #14 of 335 (26-10)2010–11: #10 of 346 (24-11)2011–12: #49 of 345 (24-11)2012–13: #85 of 347 (18-15)2013–14: #130 of 351 (17-15)2014–15: #164 of 351 (16-15)2015–16: #88 of 351 (19-15)2016–17: #214 of 351 (9-22)2017–18: #113 of 351 (21-11)2018–19: #42 of 353 (27-9)2019–20: #91 of 353 (15-16)2020–21: #215 of 347 (5-21)2021–22: #150 of 358 (17-15)2022–23: #131 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #69 of 362 (17-15)2024–25: #121 of 364 (13-18)2025–26: #57 of 365 (16-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 57 of 365 16–17 10.83 Power
2024–25 121 of 364 13–18 3.28 Power
2023–24 69 of 362 17–15 8.96 Power
2022–23 131 of 363 16–16 3.12 Power
2021–22 150 of 358 17–15 1.84 Power
2020–21 215 of 347 5–21 -2.78 Power
2019–20 91 of 353 15–16 72.64 MRI
2018–19 42 of 353 27–9 102.51 MRI
2017–18 113 of 351 21–11 64.41 MRI
2016–17 214 of 351 9–22 19.01 MRI
2015–16 88 of 351 19–15 77.71 MRI
2014–15 164 of 351 16–15 37.51 MRI
2013–14 130 of 351 17–15 52.19 MRI
2012–13 85 of 347 18–15 68.82 MRI
2011–12 49 of 345 24–11 105.09 MRI
2010–11 10 of 346 24–11 172.25 MRI
2009–10 14 of 335 26–10 150.31 MRI
2008–09 15 of 330 26–9 159.64 MRI
2007–08 90 of 328 16–17 72.67 MRI
2006–07 55 of 326 19–13 101.08 MRI
2005–06 12 of 326 26–7 147.84 MRI
2004–05 5 of 326 29–6 168.83 MRI