The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Detroit Mercy

Horizon · 0–2

Power-11.1#303 of 365
Résumé-0.13#212 · wins above average
Movement-12down from #291 last week
Worst lossXavier (55–100)
Schedule faced+17.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+4.0 avg opponent
Returning production30% of last season's win shares · #125 of 364
Incoming production0.0 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 2 games, w is 20%, so the preseason prior is 80% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-39.5 avg× 20%-7.9
Opponents faced+17.1 avg× 20%+3.4
Preseason prior-8.2× 80%-6.6
Power-11.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Marquette L 32–93 -32.0 -29.0 -2.4
3 at Xavier L 55–100 -30.2 -14.8 -2.1
Preseason prior (80% of the rating)-6.6
Power-11.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Toledo -8.3 22%
4 at Eastern Michigan -10.8 16%
4 at Michigan State -42.0 0%
5 N North Dakota -2.2 42%

Season by season

Best finish: #69 in 2012–13. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #118 of 326 (14-16)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #198 of 326 (16-16)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #174 of 326 (11-19)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #274 of 328 (7-23)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #295 of 330 (7-23)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #104 of 335 (20-14)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #142 of 346 (17-16)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #104 of 345 (22-14)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #69 of 347 (18-12)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #209 of 351 (13-19)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #196 of 351 (15-18)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #180 of 351 (16-15)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #317 of 351 (8-23)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #327 of 351 (8-24)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #276 of 353 (11-20)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #312 of 353 (8-23)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #199 of 347 (12-10)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #211 of 358 (14-16)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #202 of 363 (14-19)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #350 of 362 (1-31)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #349 of 364 (8-24)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #245 of 365 (17-15) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 17–15 #245 of 365 · -5.87 –
2024–25 8–24 #349 of 364 · -15.51 –
2023–24 1–31 #350 of 362 · -16.64 –
2022–23 14–19 #202 of 363 · -1.98 –
2021–22 14–16 #211 of 358 · -2.63 –
2020–21 12–10 #199 of 347 · -2.51 –
2019–20 8–23 – #312 of 353 · -40.24
2018–19 11–20 – #276 of 353 · -16.57
2017–18 8–24 – #327 of 351 · -47.60
2016–17 8–23 – #317 of 351 · -39.84
2015–16 16–15 – #180 of 351 · 31.79
2014–15 15–18 – #196 of 351 · 25.92
2013–14 13–19 – #209 of 351 · 22.09
2012–13 18–12 – #69 of 347 · 83.73
2011–12 22–14 – #104 of 345 · 69.31
2010–11 17–16 – #142 of 346 · 48.22
2009–10 20–14 – #104 of 335 · 66.44
2008–09 7–23 – #295 of 330 · -37.35
2007–08 7–23 – #274 of 328 · -17.51
2006–07 11–19 – #174 of 326 · 28.40
2005–06 16–16 – #198 of 326 · 21.15
2004–05 14–16 – #118 of 326 · 52.16