The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Michigan State

Big Ten · 27–8

Power+24.4#11 of 365
Résumé+18.59#13 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIllinois (85–82)
Worst lossMinnesota (73–76)
Schedule faced+12.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Colgate W 80–69 +31.0 -20.0
1 vs Arkansas W 69–66 +6.1 -3.1
2 vs San José State W 79–60 +32.8 -13.8
3 N Kentucky W 83–66 +6.2 +10.8
3 vs Detroit Mercy W 84–56 +33.3 -5.3
4 N East Carolina W 89–56 +31.8 +1.2
4 N North Carolina W 74–58 +6.7 +9.3
5 vs Iowa W 71–52 +9.3 +9.7
5 vs Duke L 60–66 -4.7 -1.3
6 at Penn State W 76–72 +19.1 -15.1
7 vs Toledo W 92–69 +24.8 -1.8
7 N Oakland W 79–70 +24.1 -15.1
9 vs Cornell W 114–97 +24.1 -7.1
9 at Nebraska L 56–58 +0.7 -2.7
10 vs USC W 80–51 +18.3 +10.7
10 vs Northwestern W 76–66 +16.7 -6.7
11 vs Indiana W 81–60 +12.8 +8.2
11 at Washington W 80–63 +10.8 +6.2
12 at Oregon W 68–52 +14.5 +1.5
12 vs Maryland W 91–48 +21.8 +21.2
13 at Rutgers W 88–79 +18.9 -9.9
13 vs Michigan L 71–83 -5.5 -6.5
14 at Minnesota L 73–76 +14.6 -17.6
14 vs Illinois W 85–82 +0.5 +2.5
15 at Wisconsin L 71–92 +2.2 -23.2
16 vs UCLA W 82–59 +10.0 +13.0
16 vs Ohio State W 66–60 +9.5 -3.5
17 at Purdue W 76–74 -3.9 +5.9
17 at Indiana W 77–64 +7.4 +5.6
18 vs Rutgers W 91–87 +24.3 -20.3
18 at Michigan L 80–90 -11.0 +1.0
19 N UCLA L 84–88 +7.3 -11.3
20 N North Dakota State W 92–67 +19.1 +5.9
20 N Louisville W 77–69 +4.4 +3.6
21 N UConn L 63–67 +0.1 -4.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #4 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 100 2004–05: #4 of 326 (26-6)2005–06: #29 of 326 (22-12)2006–07: #18 of 326 (23-12)2007–08: #15 of 328 (27-9)2008–09: #9 of 330 (31-7)2009–10: #20 of 335 (28-9)2010–11: #91 of 346 (19-15)2011–12: #4 of 345 (29-8)2012–13: #28 of 347 (24-8)2013–14: #14 of 351 (29-9)2014–15: #15 of 351 (27-12)2015–16: #4 of 351 (29-6)2016–17: #71 of 351 (20-15)2017–18: #7 of 351 (29-5)2018–19: #5 of 353 (32-7)2019–20: #13 of 353 (22-9)2020–21: #93 of 347 (15-13)2021–22: #38 of 358 (23-13)2022–23: #34 of 363 (21-13)2023–24: #20 of 362 (20-15)2024–25: #10 of 364 (30-7)2025–26: #11 of 365 (27-8) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 100 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 11 of 365 27–8 24.36 Power
2024–25 10 of 364 30–7 22.19 Power
2023–24 20 of 362 20–15 15.92 Power
2022–23 34 of 363 21–13 13.03 Power
2021–22 38 of 358 23–13 11.46 Power
2020–21 93 of 347 15–13 6.72 Power
2019–20 13 of 353 22–9 128.62 MRI
2018–19 5 of 353 32–7 202.80 MRI
2017–18 7 of 351 29–5 180.64 MRI
2016–17 71 of 351 20–15 85.88 MRI
2015–16 4 of 351 29–6 191.76 MRI
2014–15 15 of 351 27–12 149.38 MRI
2013–14 14 of 351 29–9 162.09 MRI
2012–13 28 of 347 24–8 125.68 MRI
2011–12 4 of 345 29–8 197.82 MRI
2010–11 91 of 346 19–15 74.31 MRI
2009–10 20 of 335 28–9 142.26 MRI
2008–09 9 of 330 31–7 179.22 MRI
2007–08 15 of 328 27–9 146.49 MRI
2006–07 18 of 326 23–12 139.69 MRI
2005–06 29 of 326 22–12 115.05 MRI
2004–05 4 of 326 26–6 175.51 MRI