The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

North Dakota

Summit · 1–2

Power-8.9#278 of 365
Résumé+0.26#134 · wins above average
Movement+15up from #293 last week
Best winWinthrop (93–90)
Worst lossMinnesota (50–85)
Schedule faced+8.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-7.1 avg opponent
Returning production14% of last season's win shares · #237 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production1.1 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-11.0 avg× 27%-3.0
Opponents faced+8.0 avg× 27%+2.2
Preseason prior-11.1× 73%-8.1
Power-8.9

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Minnesota L 50–85 -25.5 -9.5 -1.7
2 at Winthrop W 93–90 -7.9 +10.9 +0.8
3 at Clemson L 77–92 -26.2 +11.2 +0.1
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-8.1
Power-8.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Montana -2.7 40%
4 vs SIU Edwardsville -1.2 46%
4 vs Mayville State non-D1 +27.2 99%
5 N Detroit Mercy +2.2 58%
5 at Green Bay -10.7 17%
6 at UTEP -4.6 34%
9 at Colorado -20.2 3%
11 at Omaha -1.0 46%

Season by season

Best finish: #115 in 2016–17. 16 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2010–11 (MRI Classic): #245 of 346 (19-15)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #216 of 345 (16-14)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #233 of 347 (14-16)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #221 of 351 (17-17)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #309 of 351 (8-22)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #167 of 351 (17-16)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #115 of 351 (22-10)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #286 of 351 (12-20)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #287 of 353 (8-18)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #266 of 353 (12-18)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #285 of 347 (9-17)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #343 of 358 (6-25)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #298 of 363 (13-20)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #215 of 362 (18-14)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #266 of 364 (12-21)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #274 of 365 (18-17) MRI 2.0Classic 2010–11 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 18–17 #274 of 365 · -8.18 –
2024–25 12–21 #266 of 364 · -6.99 –
2023–24 18–14 #215 of 362 · -3.76 –
2022–23 13–20 #298 of 363 · -8.75 –
2021–22 6–25 #343 of 358 · -15.43 –
2020–21 9–17 #285 of 347 · -8.64 –
2019–20 12–18 – #266 of 353 · -8.49
2018–19 8–18 – #287 of 353 · -21.49
2017–18 12–20 – #286 of 351 · -16.86
2016–17 22–10 – #115 of 351 · 62.09
2015–16 17–16 – #167 of 351 · 41.85
2014–15 8–22 – #309 of 351 · -28.09
2013–14 17–17 – #221 of 351 · 16.35
2012–13 14–16 – #233 of 347 · 1.71
2011–12 16–14 – #216 of 345 · 14.23
2010–11 19–15 – #245 of 346 · 0.43