The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Toledo

MAC · 19–15

Power+2.2#137 of 365
Résumé+0.55#156 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTroy (75–68)
Worst lossJames Madison (71–73)
Schedule faced-2.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs South Alabama L 74–76 +4.8 -6.8
1 vs Marshall L 73–85 +6.1 -18.1
2 at Wright State W 81–71 -2.7 +12.7
2 vs Detroit Mercy W 90–83 +11.2 -4.2
3 vs Youngstown State W 92–75 +6.6 +10.4
4 N Troy W 75–68 -1.4 +8.4
4 N Belmont L 72–87 -8.1 -6.9
5 vs Central State (OH) non-D1 W 102–58 +42.9 +1.1
5 at Oakland L 97–98 -0.8 -0.2
6 at Robert Morris L 70–75 -1.9 -3.1
7 at Michigan State L 69–92 -24.8 +1.8
7 vs Lourdes University non-D1 W 100–67 +42.9 -9.9
9 vs Western Michigan W 84–79 +14.3 -9.3
9 at Central Michigan W 78–75 +6.8 -3.8
10 at Northern Illinois W 75–61 +14.4 -0.4
10 vs Miami (OH) L 73–87 -3.4 -10.6
11 vs Ohio W 101–85 +8.8 +7.2
11 at Kent State L 84–87 -2.6 -0.4
12 at Massachusetts L 82–84 +1.3 -3.3
12 vs Bowling Green W 73–72 +4.3 -3.3
13 at Akron L 81–91 -12.3 +2.3
13 vs Ball State W 73–55 +14.1 +3.9
14 vs Kent State L 72–75 +2.8 -5.8
14 at James Madison L 71–73 +1.5 -3.5
15 at Western Michigan W 90–79 +8.9 +2.1
15 at Bowling Green L 70–80 -1.2 -8.8
16 vs Eastern Michigan W 94–75 +11.4 +7.6
17 vs Northern Illinois W 79–69 +19.8 -9.8
17 at Ohio W 79–67 +3.3 +8.7
18 at Miami (OH) L 72–74 -8.9 +6.9
18 vs Buffalo W 98–78 +9.8 +10.2
19 N Bowling Green W 77–76 +1.5 -0.5
19 N Massachusetts W 77–67 +4.0 +6.0
19 N Akron L 76–79 -9.6 +6.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #48 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #114 of 326 (16-13)2005–06: #101 of 326 (20-11)2006–07: #145 of 326 (19-13)2007–08: #293 of 328 (11-19)2008–09: #316 of 330 (7-25)2009–10: #333 of 335 (4-28)2010–11: #341 of 346 (4-28)2011–12: #201 of 345 (15-15)2012–13: #180 of 347 (15-13)2013–14: #54 of 351 (27-7)2014–15: #75 of 351 (20-13)2015–16: #102 of 351 (17-15)2016–17: #121 of 351 (17-17)2017–18: #85 of 351 (23-11)2018–19: #51 of 353 (24-8)2019–20: #149 of 353 (16-15)2020–21: #48 of 347 (21-9)2021–22: #51 of 358 (26-8)2022–23: #73 of 363 (27-8)2023–24: #114 of 362 (20-12)2024–25: #203 of 364 (18-15)2025–26: #137 of 365 (19-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 137 of 365 19–15 2.25 Power
2024–25 203 of 364 18–15 -2.24 Power
2023–24 114 of 362 20–12 4.62 Power
2022–23 73 of 363 27–8 9.15 Power
2021–22 51 of 358 26–8 10.46 Power
2020–21 48 of 347 21–9 9.86 Power
2019–20 149 of 353 16–15 43.11 MRI
2018–19 51 of 353 24–8 96.10 MRI
2017–18 85 of 351 23–11 80.70 MRI
2016–17 121 of 351 17–17 57.57 MRI
2015–16 102 of 351 17–15 71.91 MRI
2014–15 75 of 351 20–13 84.58 MRI
2013–14 54 of 351 27–7 100.01 MRI
2012–13 180 of 347 15–13 25.27 MRI
2011–12 201 of 345 15–15 19.88 MRI
2010–11 341 of 346 4–28 -93.04 MRI
2009–10 333 of 335 4–28 -88.39 MRI
2008–09 316 of 330 7–25 -61.06 MRI
2007–08 293 of 328 11–19 -30.30 MRI
2006–07 145 of 326 19–13 42.36 MRI
2005–06 101 of 326 20–11 62.65 MRI
2004–05 114 of 326 16–13 52.88 MRI