Florida International
CUSA · 2–0
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 2 games, w is 20%, so the preseason prior is 80% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +21.7 avg | × 20% | +4.3 |
| Opponents faced | -23.5 avg | × 20% | -4.7 |
| Preseason prior | -2.6 | × 80% | -2.0 |
| Power | -2.4 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs | New College (FL) non-D1 | W 101–58 | +33.7 | +9.3 | +0.5 |
| 2 | vs | West Florida | W 85–75 | +15.9 | -5.9 | -0.9 |
| Preseason prior (80% of the rating) | -2.0 | |||||
| Power | -2.4 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | at | Florida Gulf Coast | -0.6 | 48% |
| 4 | at | UAB | -4.6 | 34% |
| 5 | vs | Long Beach State | +9.3 | 80% |
| 5 | vs | Southern Utah | +6.8 | 73% |
| 5 | vs | Arkansas State | +3.6 | 63% |
| 7 | at | Xavier | -21.6 | 2% |
| 10 | at | New Mexico State | -2.1 | 42% |
| 10 | at | Sam Houston | -4.7 | 33% |
Season by season
Best finish: #160 in 2012–13. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 15–17 | #204 of 365 · -2.97 | – |
| 2024–25 | 10–23 | #277 of 364 · -7.81 | – |
| 2023–24 | 11–22 | #274 of 362 · -6.75 | – |
| 2022–23 | 14–18 | #235 of 363 · -4.48 | – |
| 2021–22 | 15–17 | #260 of 358 · -6.17 | – |
| 2020–21 | 9–17 | #255 of 347 · -6.20 | – |
| 2019–20 | 16–13 | – | #189 of 353 · 26.53 |
| 2018–19 | 16–14 | – | #239 of 353 · -0.29 |
| 2017–18 | 14–18 | – | #225 of 351 · 14.03 |
| 2016–17 | 7–24 | – | #278 of 351 · -11.67 |
| 2015–16 | 13–19 | – | #214 of 351 · 13.28 |
| 2014–15 | 16–17 | – | #276 of 351 · -9.26 |
| 2013–14 | 15–16 | – | #225 of 351 · 14.15 |
| 2012–13 | 18–14 | – | #160 of 347 · 35.11 |
| 2011–12 | 8–21 | – | #255 of 345 · -5.91 |
| 2010–11 | 11–19 | – | #266 of 346 · -8.93 |
| 2009–10 | 7–25 | – | #314 of 335 · -52.60 |
| 2008–09 | 13–20 | – | #279 of 330 · -16.97 |
| 2007–08 | 9–20 | – | #246 of 328 · -6.33 |
| 2006–07 | 12–17 | – | #271 of 326 · -17.33 |
| 2005–06 | 8–20 | – | #295 of 326 · -33.09 |
| 2004–05 | 13–16 | – | #180 of 326 · 25.56 |