The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Southern Utah

UAC · 10–22

Power-8.4#285 of 365
Résumé-7.26#647 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUtah Valley (84–70)
Worst lossNorthern Arizona (57–65)
Schedule faced-3.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Arizona State L 64–81 -19.5 +2.5
1 vs UT Rio Grande Valley L 72–95 -5.8 -17.2
2 vs Bethesda University non-D1 W 118–60 +32.2 +25.8
2 at Omaha L 85–90 -5.6 +0.6
3 at Gonzaga L 50–122 -35.9 -36.1
3 at Washington State L 74–98 -12.3 -11.7
3 vs Nobel non-D1 W 103–68 +32.2 +2.8
4 at Robert Morris L 54–61 -12.6 +5.6
4 N Stetson W 70–68 +4.2 -2.2
5 vs West Coast Baptist non-D1 W 124–59 +32.2 +32.8
5 at Oregon State L 70–81 -10.6 -0.4
6 at Washington L 69–105 -21.9 -14.1
7 at Northern Arizona L 57–65 -0.1 -7.9
9 at Utah Tech L 66–80 -7.0 -7.0
9 vs UT Arlington L 77–86 -5.1 -3.9
10 at Utah Valley L 72–89 -18.5 +1.5
10 at California Baptist L 55–58 -14.8 +11.8
11 vs Tarleton State W 106–105 -0.6 +1.6
11 vs Abilene Christian W 74–52 +0.7 +21.3
12 vs Utah Valley W 84–70 -13.0 +27.0
12 at Utah Tech L 91–102 -7.0 -4.0
13 at UT Arlington L 61–80 -10.5 -8.5
13 at Abilene Christian W 79–76 -4.8 +7.8
14 vs Tarleton State L 59–62 -0.6 -2.4
15 vs California Baptist L 66–83 -9.4 -7.6
15 at UT Arlington W 78–73 -10.5 +15.5
16 at Tarleton State L 74–78 -6.1 +2.1
16 at Abilene Christian L 83–87 -4.8 +0.8
17 vs Utah Tech W 81–67 -1.6 +15.6
18 vs Utah Valley L 88–92 -13.0 +9.0
18 vs California Baptist L 75–82 -9.4 +2.4
19 N UT Arlington L 63–69 -7.8 +1.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #83 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #285 of 326 (13-14)2005–06: #290 of 326 (10-20)2006–07: #190 of 326 (16-14)2007–08: #210 of 328 (11-19)2008–09: #256 of 330 (11-20)2009–10: #316 of 335 (7-22)2010–11: #263 of 346 (11-19)2011–12: #218 of 345 (13-17)2012–13: #298 of 347 (9-20)2013–14: #351 of 351 (2-27)2014–15: #317 of 351 (10-19)2015–16: #340 of 351 (5-24)2016–17: #336 of 351 (6-27)2017–18: #282 of 351 (13-19)2018–19: #250 of 353 (15-17)2019–20: #157 of 353 (15-15)2020–21: #83 of 347 (20-4)2021–22: #127 of 358 (23-12)2022–23: #104 of 363 (24-13)2023–24: #201 of 362 (10-21)2024–25: #286 of 364 (12-19)2025–26: #285 of 365 (10-22) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 285 of 365 10–22 -8.38 Power
2024–25 286 of 364 12–19 -8.31 Power
2023–24 201 of 362 10–21 -2.72 Power
2022–23 104 of 363 24–13 5.46 Power
2021–22 127 of 358 23–12 3.68 Power
2020–21 83 of 347 20–4 7.33 Power
2019–20 157 of 353 15–15 39.19 MRI
2018–19 250 of 353 15–17 -4.26 MRI
2017–18 282 of 351 13–19 -14.60 MRI
2016–17 336 of 351 6–27 -65.42 MRI
2015–16 340 of 351 5–24 -69.35 MRI
2014–15 317 of 351 10–19 -33.26 MRI
2013–14 351 of 351 2–27 -115.24 MRI
2012–13 298 of 347 9–20 -31.12 MRI
2011–12 218 of 345 13–17 13.78 MRI
2010–11 263 of 346 11–19 -7.83 MRI
2009–10 316 of 335 7–22 -55.47 MRI
2008–09 256 of 330 11–20 -5.00 MRI
2007–08 210 of 328 11–19 13.13 MRI
2006–07 190 of 326 16–14 21.61 MRI
2005–06 290 of 326 10–20 -27.41 MRI
2004–05 285 of 326 13–14 -23.36 MRI