The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Florida Gulf Coast

ASUN · 1–2

Power-4.8#219 of 365
Résumé-0.27#236 · wins above average
Movement+15up from #234 last week
Best winNew College (FL) (89–67)
Worst lossUCF (95–96)
Schedule faced-2.6 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-8.2 avg opponent
Returning production12% of last season's win shares · #261 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production0.3 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+8.2 avg× 27%+2.2
Opponents faced-2.6 avg× 27%-0.7
Preseason prior-8.7× 73%-6.3
Power-4.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at UCF L 95–96 -17.8 +16.8 +1.5
2 vs New College (FL) non-D1 W 89–67 +31.4 -9.4 -0.9
3 at Georgia L 72–80 -21.5 +13.5 +0.9
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-6.3
Power-4.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Florida International +0.6 52%
3 vs Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College non-D1 +31.4 100%
4 at Florida Atlantic -9.0 21%
5 N Charlotte -4.8 33%
5 N Georgia State +1.8 56%
5 at New Orleans +0.5 52%
11 at Stetson +3.4 62%
12 at Bellarmine +0.9 53%

Season by season

Best finish: #61 in 2016–17. 16 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2010–11 (MRI Classic): #289 of 346 (10-20)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #193 of 345 (15-17)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #79 of 347 (22-10)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #115 of 351 (22-13)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #117 of 351 (22-11)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #111 of 351 (21-14)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #61 of 351 (26-8)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #68 of 351 (23-12)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #264 of 353 (12-18)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #303 of 353 (8-22)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #260 of 347 (10-8)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #181 of 358 (22-12)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #168 of 363 (17-15)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #205 of 362 (14-18)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #192 of 364 (19-15)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #222 of 365 (16-18) MRI 2.0Classic 2010–11 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 16–18 #222 of 365 · -4.69 –
2024–25 19–15 #192 of 364 · -1.85 –
2023–24 14–18 #205 of 362 · -3.36 –
2022–23 17–15 #168 of 363 · 0.03 –
2021–22 22–12 #181 of 358 · -0.48 –
2020–21 10–8 #260 of 347 · -6.68 –
2019–20 8–22 – #303 of 353 · -32.15
2018–19 12–18 – #264 of 353 · -9.15
2017–18 23–12 – #68 of 351 · 92.68
2016–17 26–8 – #61 of 351 · 92.59
2015–16 21–14 – #111 of 351 · 65.92
2014–15 22–11 – #117 of 351 · 59.49
2013–14 22–13 – #115 of 351 · 62.09
2012–13 22–10 – #79 of 347 · 72.96
2011–12 15–17 – #193 of 345 · 22.79
2010–11 10–20 – #289 of 346 · -20.72