The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Kansas

Big 12 · 24–11

Power+20.3#19 of 365
Résumé+16.73#18 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winArizona (82–78)
Worst lossArizona State (60–70)
Schedule faced+13.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Green Bay W 94–51 +28.2 +14.8
1 at North Carolina L 74–87 -0.2 -12.8
2 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 77–46 +24.9 +6.1
2 vs Princeton W 76–57 +27.7 -8.7
3 N Duke L 66–78 -11.5 -0.5
4 N Notre Dame W 71–61 +15.2 -5.2
4 N Syracuse W 71–60 +14.2 -3.2
4 N Tennessee W 81–76 -2.8 +7.8
5 vs UConn L 56–61 -1.3 -3.7
5 N Missouri W 80–60 +7.6 +12.4
6 at NC State W 77–76 +3.8 -2.8
7 vs Towson W 73–49 +22.0 +2.0
8 vs Davidson W 90–61 +19.9 +9.1
9 at UCF L 75–81 +6.2 -12.2
10 vs TCU W 104–100 +10.0 -6.0
10 at West Virginia L 75–86 +5.7 -16.7
11 vs Iowa State W 84–63 -3.7 +24.7
11 vs Baylor W 80–62 +9.5 +8.5
12 at Colorado W 75–69 +9.0 -3.0
12 at Kansas State W 86–62 +12.6 +11.4
13 vs BYU W 90–82 +3.8 +4.2
14 at Texas Tech W 64–61 -4.0 +7.0
14 vs Utah W 71–59 +20.1 -8.1
15 vs Arizona W 82–78 -8.4 +12.4
15 at Iowa State L 56–74 -9.1 -8.9
16 at Oklahoma State W 81–69 +9.7 +2.3
16 vs Cincinnati L 68–84 +8.6 -24.6
17 vs Houston W 69–56 -5.1 +18.1
17 at Arizona L 61–84 -13.8 -9.2
18 at Arizona State L 60–70 +9.2 -19.2
18 vs Kansas State W 104–85 +18.1 +0.9
19 N TCU W 78–73 +7.3 -2.3
19 N Houston L 47–69 -7.9 -14.1
20 N California Baptist W 68–60 +16.5 -8.5
20 N St. John's L 65–67 -3.2 +1.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2010–11. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

ClassicMRI 2.0 1 25 2004–05: #17 of 326 (23-7)2005–06: #7 of 326 (25-8)2006–07: #4 of 326 (33-5)2007–08: #2 of 328 (37-3)2008–09: #8 of 330 (27-8)2009–10: #2 of 335 (33-3)2010–11: #2 of 346 (35-3)2011–12: #6 of 345 (32-7)2012–13: #5 of 347 (29-5)2013–14: #11 of 351 (25-10)2014–15: #21 of 351 (27-9)2015–16: #3 of 351 (33-5)2016–17: #12 of 351 (31-5)2017–18: #14 of 351 (30-8)2018–19: #22 of 353 (26-10)2019–20: #5 of 353 (27-3)2020–21: #17 of 347 (21-9)2021–22: #5 of 358 (34-6)2022–23: #7 of 363 (28-8)2023–24: #17 of 362 (23-11)2024–25: #19 of 364 (21-13)2025–26: #19 of 365 (24-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 25 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 19 of 365 24–11 20.26 Power
2024–25 19 of 364 21–13 18.51 Power
2023–24 17 of 362 23–11 16.35 Power
2022–23 7 of 363 28–8 19.57 Power
2021–22 5 of 358 34–6 21.35 Power
2020–21 17 of 347 21–9 14.73 Power
2019–20 5 of 353 27–3 172.83 MRI
2018–19 22 of 353 26–10 133.61 MRI
2017–18 14 of 351 30–8 154.90 MRI
2016–17 12 of 351 31–5 178.77 MRI
2015–16 3 of 351 33–5 201.79 MRI
2014–15 21 of 351 27–9 141.68 MRI
2013–14 11 of 351 25–10 169.25 MRI
2012–13 5 of 347 29–5 190.48 MRI
2011–12 6 of 345 32–7 180.56 MRI
2010–11 2 of 346 35–3 249.85 MRI
2009–10 2 of 335 33–3 237.88 MRI
2008–09 8 of 330 27–8 180.72 MRI
2007–08 2 of 328 37–3 275.15 MRI
2006–07 4 of 326 33–5 217.08 MRI
2005–06 7 of 326 25–8 165.71 MRI
2004–05 17 of 326 23–7 147.01 MRI