The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Miami (OH)

MAC · 32–2

Power+8.4#80 of 365
Résumé+10.53#49 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSMU (89–79)
Worst lossMassachusetts (83–87)
Schedule faced-6.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Old Dominion W 87–72 +17.6 -2.6
1 vs Trinity Christian (IL) non-D1 W 129–49 +49.0 +31.0
2 at Air Force W 76–61 +23.9 -8.9
3 vs Mercyhurst W 76–71 +20.0 -15.0
3 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 111–84 +26.2 +0.8
4 N UNC Greensboro W 82–71 +15.9 -4.9
5 vs Indiana University East non-D1 W 109–65 +49.0 -5.0
5 vs Maine W 93–61 +23.7 +8.3
6 at UNC Asheville W 90–87 +9.7 -6.7
6 at Eastern Kentucky W 79–69 +13.2 -3.2
7 at Wright State W 83–76 +3.4 +3.6
7 at Ball State W 86–77 +14.7 -5.7
8 vs Milligan non-D1 W 135–81 +49.0 +5.0
9 at Bowling Green W 93–83 +4.9 +5.1
9 vs Akron W 76–73 -0.7 +3.7
10 vs Western Michigan W 87–76 +20.5 -9.5
10 at Toledo W 87–73 +3.4 +10.6
11 vs Central Michigan W 100–61 +18.4 +20.6
11 vs Buffalo W 105–102 +16.0 -13.0
12 at Kent State W 107–101 +3.5 +2.5
13 vs Massachusetts W 86–84 +12.9 -10.9
13 vs Northern Illinois W 85–61 +26.0 -2.0
14 at Buffalo W 73–71 +10.5 -8.5
14 at Marshall W 90–74 +6.7 +9.3
15 vs Ohio W 90–74 +14.9 +1.1
16 at Massachusetts W 86–77 +7.4 +1.6
16 vs Bowling Green W 91–77 +10.4 +3.6
17 at Eastern Michigan W 74–64 +12.1 -2.1
17 at Western Michigan W 69–67 +15.0 -13.0
18 vs Toledo W 74–72 +8.9 -6.9
18 at Ohio W 110–108 +9.5 -7.5
19 N Massachusetts L 83–87 +10.2 -14.2
20 N SMU W 89–79 -5.6 +15.6
20 N Tennessee L 56–78 -14.7 -7.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #65 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #65 of 326 (19-11)2005–06: #111 of 326 (18-11)2006–07: #133 of 326 (18-15)2007–08: #118 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #109 of 330 (17-13)2009–10: #190 of 335 (14-18)2010–11: #224 of 346 (16-17)2011–12: #252 of 345 (9-21)2012–13: #277 of 347 (8-22)2013–14: #259 of 351 (13-18)2014–15: #255 of 351 (13-19)2015–16: #238 of 351 (13-20)2016–17: #298 of 351 (11-21)2017–18: #206 of 351 (16-18)2018–19: #176 of 353 (13-17)2019–20: #231 of 353 (11-19)2020–21: #171 of 347 (12-11)2021–22: #217 of 358 (14-18)2022–23: #265 of 363 (12-20)2023–24: #247 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #151 of 364 (25-9)2025–26: #80 of 365 (32-2) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 80 of 365 32–2 8.38 Power
2024–25 151 of 364 25–9 1.16 Power
2023–24 247 of 362 15–17 -5.04 Power
2022–23 265 of 363 12–20 -6.23 Power
2021–22 217 of 358 14–18 -3.15 Power
2020–21 171 of 347 12–11 -0.36 Power
2019–20 231 of 353 11–19 4.92 MRI
2018–19 176 of 353 13–17 27.83 MRI
2017–18 206 of 351 16–18 23.43 MRI
2016–17 298 of 351 11–21 -25.40 MRI
2015–16 238 of 351 13–20 2.60 MRI
2014–15 255 of 351 13–19 1.18 MRI
2013–14 259 of 351 13–18 0.03 MRI
2012–13 277 of 347 8–22 -22.67 MRI
2011–12 252 of 345 9–21 -4.65 MRI
2010–11 224 of 346 16–17 11.81 MRI
2009–10 190 of 335 14–18 24.52 MRI
2008–09 109 of 330 17–13 62.07 MRI
2007–08 118 of 328 17–16 58.84 MRI
2006–07 133 of 326 18–15 47.71 MRI
2005–06 111 of 326 18–11 57.96 MRI
2004–05 65 of 326 19–11 83.00 MRI