The MRI
2025–26 · Final

High Point

Big South · 31–5

Power+10.8#56 of 365
Résumé+7.05#72 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWisconsin (83–82)
Worst lossApp State (78–86)
Schedule faced-7.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Furman W 97–71 +9.2 +16.8
1 vs Averett non-D1 W 127–52 +51.5 +23.5
2 vs Jacksonville W 85–64 +22.2 -1.2
2 at UAB L 74–91 +3.8 -20.8
3 vs Canisius W 93–50 +30.0 +13.0
3 N UIC W 90–80 +6.9 +3.1
3 N Incarnate Word W 91–80 +18.4 -7.4
4 vs Western Carolina W 93–73 +18.5 +1.5
5 vs Southern Illinois L 84–86 +10.3 -12.3
5 vs NJIT W 89–72 +27.1 -10.1
6 N App State L 78–86 +11.6 -19.6
7 vs Mary Baldwin non-D1 W 129–47 +51.5 +30.5
7 vs La Salle W 84–72 +19.5 -7.5
8 vs Bryant W 93–47 +26.0 +20.0
8 vs Pfeiffer non-D1 W 123–64 +51.5 +7.5
9 at UNC Asheville W 87–69 +12.2 +5.8
9 vs Longwood W 80–67 +18.2 -5.2
10 vs Gardner-Webb W 104–49 +34.6 +20.4
10 at Charleston Southern W 84–82 +14.0 -12.0
11 at Winthrop L 75–92 +5.2 -22.2
11 vs South Carolina Upstate W 89–69 +23.1 -3.1
12 at Radford W 93–83 +12.4 -2.4
13 vs Presbyterian W 84–81 +19.8 -16.8
13 at Longwood W 71–59 +12.7 -0.7
14 vs Charleston Southern W 80–55 +19.4 +5.6
14 vs Radford W 86–77 +17.8 -8.8
15 at South Carolina Upstate W 95–70 +17.6 +7.4
15 at Gardner-Webb W 112–87 +29.2 -4.2
16 vs UNC Asheville W 74–48 +17.6 +8.4
16 vs Winthrop W 89–87 +10.6 -8.6
17 at Presbyterian W 79–73 +14.3 -8.3
18 N Gardner-Webb W 81–59 +31.9 -9.9
18 N UNC Asheville W 75–71 +14.9 -10.9
18 N Winthrop W 91–76 +7.9 +7.1
20 N Wisconsin W 83–82 -8.6 +9.6
20 N Arkansas L 88–94 -10.2 +4.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #56 in 2025–26. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #144 of 326 (13-17)2005–06: #192 of 326 (16-13)2006–07: #123 of 326 (22-10)2007–08: #140 of 328 (17-14)2008–09: #277 of 330 (9-21)2009–10: #234 of 335 (15-15)2010–11: #294 of 346 (12-19)2011–12: #227 of 345 (13-18)2012–13: #164 of 347 (15-13)2013–14: #223 of 351 (16-15)2014–15: #102 of 351 (23-10)2015–16: #108 of 351 (21-11)2016–17: #217 of 351 (15-16)2017–18: #171 of 351 (14-16)2018–19: #197 of 353 (14-15)2019–20: #333 of 353 (7-23)2020–21: #298 of 347 (9-15)2021–22: #248 of 358 (14-18)2022–23: #287 of 363 (14-17)2023–24: #124 of 362 (27-9)2024–25: #78 of 364 (29-6)2025–26: #56 of 365 (31-5) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 56 of 365 31–5 10.85 Power
2024–25 78 of 364 29–6 8.26 Power
2023–24 124 of 362 27–9 3.73 Power
2022–23 287 of 363 14–17 -7.79 Power
2021–22 248 of 358 14–18 -5.57 Power
2020–21 298 of 347 9–15 -9.05 Power
2019–20 333 of 353 7–23 -59.01 MRI
2018–19 197 of 353 14–15 19.99 MRI
2017–18 171 of 351 14–16 39.28 MRI
2016–17 217 of 351 15–16 17.61 MRI
2015–16 108 of 351 21–11 67.64 MRI
2014–15 102 of 351 23–10 68.70 MRI
2013–14 223 of 351 16–15 15.43 MRI
2012–13 164 of 347 15–13 34.08 MRI
2011–12 227 of 345 13–18 11.43 MRI
2010–11 294 of 346 12–19 -24.04 MRI
2009–10 234 of 335 15–15 6.11 MRI
2008–09 277 of 330 9–21 -15.83 MRI
2007–08 140 of 328 17–14 46.15 MRI
2006–07 123 of 326 22–10 53.71 MRI
2005–06 192 of 326 16–13 23.70 MRI
2004–05 144 of 326 13–17 39.86 MRI