The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Bowling Green

MAC · 18–14

Power+0.7#153 of 365
Résumé-1.68#535 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winKansas State (82–66)
Worst lossWestern Michigan (79–88)
Schedule faced-6.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Texas State W 83–48 +7.9 +27.1
1 vs Bethany (WV) non-D1 W 120–65 +41.3 +13.7
1 vs Le Moyne W 83–60 +14.1 +8.9
2 at Davidson L 87–91 -5.1 +1.1
3 vs William & Mary L 74–82 +2.5 -10.5
4 vs Bucknell W 71–66 +16.5 -11.5
4 at VMI W 81–48 +15.9 +17.1
5 at Kansas State W 82–66 -7.0 +23.0
5 vs Utah Valley L 71–82 -3.9 -7.1
5 vs Aquinas non-D1 W 131–50 +41.3 +39.7
7 vs Chicago State W 76–55 +21.0 +0.0
7 at Ohio W 68–58 +1.8 +8.2
8 vs Siena Heights non-D1 W 125–66 +41.3 +17.7
9 vs Miami (OH) L 83–93 -4.9 -5.1
9 at Massachusetts W 101–100 -0.2 +1.2
10 at Kent State L 93–96 -4.2 +1.2
10 vs Akron L 67–77 -8.4 -1.6
11 vs Eastern Michigan W 85–79 +9.8 -3.8
12 at Western Michigan W 72–54 +7.3 +10.7
12 at Toledo L 72–73 -4.3 +3.3
13 vs Buffalo L 78–89 +8.3 -19.3
13 at Central Michigan L 59–62 +5.2 -8.2
14 vs Ball State W 77–52 +12.5 +12.5
14 at Arkansas State L 54–91 -5.9 -31.1
15 at Northern Illinois W 68–52 +12.8 +3.2
15 vs Toledo W 80–70 +1.2 +8.8
16 vs Kent State L 71–78 +1.3 -8.3
16 at Miami (OH) L 77–91 -10.4 -3.6
17 vs Western Michigan L 79–88 +12.8 -21.8
17 vs Massachusetts W 81–62 +5.2 +13.8
18 at Eastern Michigan W 77–69 +4.4 +3.6
19 N Toledo L 76–77 -1.5 +0.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #80 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #164 of 326 (18-11)2005–06: #297 of 326 (9-21)2006–07: #257 of 326 (13-18)2007–08: #244 of 328 (13-17)2008–09: #145 of 330 (19-14)2009–10: #208 of 335 (14-16)2010–11: #236 of 346 (14-19)2011–12: #136 of 345 (16-15)2012–13: #217 of 347 (11-19)2013–14: #230 of 351 (12-20)2014–15: #109 of 351 (21-12)2015–16: #227 of 351 (16-18)2016–17: #250 of 351 (13-19)2017–18: #207 of 351 (16-16)2018–19: #80 of 353 (20-12)2019–20: #137 of 353 (19-10)2020–21: #118 of 347 (14-12)2021–22: #232 of 358 (13-18)2022–23: #279 of 363 (11-20)2023–24: #222 of 362 (20-14)2024–25: #277 of 364 (14-18)2025–26: #153 of 365 (18-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 153 of 365 18–14 0.71 Power
2024–25 277 of 364 14–18 -7.54 Power
2023–24 222 of 362 20–14 -3.98 Power
2022–23 279 of 363 11–20 -7.25 Power
2021–22 232 of 358 13–18 -4.22 Power
2020–21 118 of 347 14–12 3.87 Power
2019–20 137 of 353 19–10 46.42 MRI
2018–19 80 of 353 20–12 72.09 MRI
2017–18 207 of 351 16–16 22.56 MRI
2016–17 250 of 351 13–19 1.57 MRI
2015–16 227 of 351 16–18 8.69 MRI
2014–15 109 of 351 21–12 64.78 MRI
2013–14 230 of 351 12–20 12.97 MRI
2012–13 217 of 347 11–19 9.11 MRI
2011–12 136 of 345 16–15 49.97 MRI
2010–11 236 of 346 14–19 4.35 MRI
2009–10 208 of 335 14–16 14.71 MRI
2008–09 145 of 330 19–14 42.70 MRI
2007–08 244 of 328 13–17 -6.10 MRI
2006–07 257 of 326 13–18 -11.45 MRI
2005–06 297 of 326 9–21 -35.38 MRI
2004–05 164 of 326 18–11 31.72 MRI