The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Mount St. Mary's

Metro · 15–17

Power-7.4#270 of 365
Résumé-5.85#628 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winHoward (79–75)
Worst lossBucknell (62–73)
Schedule faced-6.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at West Virginia L 54–70 -21.9 +5.9
1 vs Bucknell L 62–73 +8.3 -19.4
2 at St. Francis (PA) W 74–66 +7.5 +0.5
2 at Cincinnati L 55–72 -24.5 +7.5
3 at Maryland L 90–95 -15.4 +10.4
3 at Western Michigan L 60–83 -0.8 -22.2
4 at Ohio State L 60–113 -27.7 -25.3
4 vs Howard W 79–75 -2.8 +6.8
5 vs Sacred Heart L 80–87 +3.6 -10.6
5 at Marist L 56–64 -8.7 +0.7
6 at Loyola Maryland W 81–73 +2.0 +6.0
7 at Drexel L 67–75 -6.6 -1.4
7 vs Penn State (Brandywine) non-D1 W 73–42 +33.2 -2.2
9 vs Iona W 66–59 +0.1 +6.9
9 at Merrimack L 65–75 -9.7 -0.3
9 at Quinnipiac L 69–80 -8.5 -2.5
10 vs Saint Peter's W 70–65 +0.4 +4.6
10 vs Siena L 50–67 -3.8 -13.2
11 at Canisius W 78–68 +6.3 +3.7
12 at Niagara W 68–58 +4.3 +5.7
12 vs Quinnipiac L 62–77 -3.1 -11.9
12 vs Rider W 71–61 +13.3 -3.3
13 at Saint Peter's L 58–66 -5.1 -2.9
13 vs Manhattan W 72–65 +8.2 -1.2
14 vs Merrimack L 70–87 -4.3 -12.7
14 at Iona W 83–76 -5.3 +12.3
15 at Rider W 65–55 +7.8 +2.2
16 vs Niagara W 76–63 +9.8 +3.2
16 vs Canisius W 68–47 +11.8 +9.2
17 at Sacred Heart L 69–77 -1.9 -6.1
17 at Fairfield W 69–47 -3.7 +25.7
18 N Siena L 58–63 -6.6 +1.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #102 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #309 of 326 (7-20)2005–06: #228 of 326 (13-17)2006–07: #227 of 326 (10-20)2007–08: #155 of 328 (19-15)2008–09: #102 of 330 (19-14)2009–10: #169 of 335 (16-15)2010–11: #285 of 346 (11-21)2011–12: #300 of 345 (8-21)2012–13: #175 of 347 (18-14)2013–14: #237 of 351 (16-17)2014–15: #222 of 351 (15-15)2015–16: #231 of 351 (14-19)2016–17: #228 of 351 (19-16)2017–18: #232 of 351 (18-13)2018–19: #325 of 353 (7-22)2019–20: #280 of 353 (10-21)2020–21: #223 of 347 (12-11)2021–22: #239 of 358 (14-16)2022–23: #282 of 363 (13-20)2023–24: #255 of 362 (13-19)2024–25: #240 of 364 (23-13)2025–26: #270 of 365 (15-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 270 of 365 15–17 -7.40 Power
2024–25 240 of 364 23–13 -4.98 Power
2023–24 255 of 362 13–19 -5.56 Power
2022–23 282 of 363 13–20 -7.50 Power
2021–22 239 of 358 14–16 -4.68 Power
2020–21 223 of 347 12–11 -3.66 Power
2019–20 280 of 353 10–21 -16.22 MRI
2018–19 325 of 353 7–22 -49.92 MRI
2017–18 232 of 351 18–13 11.28 MRI
2016–17 228 of 351 19–16 12.94 MRI
2015–16 231 of 351 14–19 7.14 MRI
2014–15 222 of 351 15–15 15.60 MRI
2013–14 237 of 351 16–17 9.74 MRI
2012–13 175 of 347 18–14 25.68 MRI
2011–12 300 of 345 8–21 -30.62 MRI
2010–11 285 of 346 11–21 -18.90 MRI
2009–10 169 of 335 16–15 35.73 MRI
2008–09 102 of 330 19–14 64.90 MRI
2007–08 155 of 328 19–15 38.59 MRI
2006–07 227 of 326 10–20 4.41 MRI
2005–06 228 of 326 13–17 5.59 MRI
2004–05 309 of 326 7–20 -44.13 MRI