Western Michigan
MAC · 3–1
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +20.5 avg | × 33% | +6.8 |
| Opponents faced | -10.8 avg | × 33% | -3.6 |
| Preseason prior | -4.9 | × 67% | -3.3 |
| Power | -0.1 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | Old Dominion | L 49–61 | -0.7 | -11.3 | -1.0 |
| 2 | vs | Kalamazoo non-D1 | W 99–52 | +36.1 | +10.9 | +1.1 |
| 2 | vs | Campbell | W 87–71 | +10.0 | +6.0 | +0.6 |
| 3 | at | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 81–59 | +5.0 | +17.0 | +2.5 |
| Preseason prior (67% of the rating) | -3.3 | |||||
| Power | -0.1 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | at | Southern Indiana | +9.7 | 81% |
| 4 | at | Mount St. Mary's | +7.4 | 75% |
| 5 | vs | Grace Christian non-D1 | +36.1 | 100% |
| 6 | vs | Buffalo | +9.3 | 80% |
| 6 | at | Bowling Green | -1.5 | 45% |
| 7 | at | Massachusetts | -0.7 | 48% |
| 7 | vs | Toledo | +2.7 | 60% |
| 10 | at | Akron | -14.5 | 9% |
Season by season
Best finish: #54 in 2004–05. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 10–21 | #296 of 365 · -9.77 | – |
| 2024–25 | 12–20 | #301 of 364 · -9.64 | – |
| 2023–24 | 12–20 | #304 of 362 · -9.44 | – |
| 2022–23 | 8–23 | #313 of 363 · -10.02 | – |
| 2021–22 | 8–23 | #335 of 358 · -12.80 | – |
| 2020–21 | 5–16 | #307 of 347 · -10.75 | – |
| 2019–20 | 11–19 | – | #283 of 353 · -18.52 |
| 2018–19 | 7–24 | – | #301 of 353 · -31.28 |
| 2017–18 | 17–15 | – | #149 of 351 · 48.31 |
| 2016–17 | 16–16 | – | #158 of 351 · 42.12 |
| 2015–16 | 13–19 | – | #183 of 351 · 30.82 |
| 2014–15 | 20–14 | – | #162 of 351 · 38.42 |
| 2013–14 | 23–10 | – | #101 of 351 · 68.18 |
| 2012–13 | 19–12 | – | #128 of 347 · 48.54 |
| 2011–12 | 14–20 | – | #196 of 345 · 21.37 |
| 2010–11 | 21–13 | – | #140 of 346 · 49.07 |
| 2009–10 | 18–15 | – | #133 of 335 · 51.83 |
| 2008–09 | 10–21 | – | #264 of 330 · -10.26 |
| 2007–08 | 20–12 | – | #98 of 328 · 70.53 |
| 2006–07 | 16–16 | – | #141 of 326 · 43.56 |
| 2005–06 | 14–17 | – | #246 of 326 · -2.22 |
| 2004–05 | 20–13 | – | #54 of 326 · 95.74 |