Western Michigan

MAC · 10–21

Power-9.4#292 of 365

Résumé-7.47#652 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winBowling Green (88–79)
Worst lossNorthwood (MI) (81–85)
Schedule faced-3.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Coastal Carolina	W 76–71	-0.3	+5.3
1	vs	Northwood (MI) non-D1	L 81–85	+31.2	-35.2
1	at	Campbell	L 82–91	-9.5	+0.5
2	vs	Purdue Fort Wayne	W 83–71	-2.1	+14.1
2	at	South Dakota	L 78–83	-3.9	-1.1
3	at	Ohio State	L 58–91	-29.7	-3.3
3	vs	Mount St. Mary's	W 83–60	+0.8	+22.2
4	at	Valparaiso	L 55–84	-11.5	-17.5
5	vs	Southern Indiana	W 88–74	+8.5	+5.5
5	at	SIU Edwardsville	W 83–73	-7.9	+17.9
6	at	Iowa	L 51–91	-29.9	-10.1
7	vs	Buffalo	L 71–88	-1.8	-15.2
8	vs	Defiance non-D1	W 94–57	+31.2	+5.8
9	at	Toledo	L 79–84	-14.3	+9.3
10	at	Miami (OH)	L 76–87	-20.5	+9.5
10	vs	Eastern Michigan	W 79–62	-0.2	+17.2
11	vs	Massachusetts	L 82–85	-4.9	+1.9
11	at	Akron	L 89–104	-23.9	+8.9
12	vs	Bowling Green	L 54–72	-7.3	-10.7
12	vs	Central Michigan	W 77–65	+0.6	+11.4
13	at	Northern Illinois	L 65–85	+2.8	-22.8
14	at	Ohio	L 71–91	-8.3	-11.7
14	at	Texas State	L 61–77	-7.6	-8.4
15	vs	Toledo	L 79–90	-8.9	-2.1
15	at	Eastern Michigan	W 76–62	-5.7	+19.7
16	vs	Akron	L 73–90	-18.4	+1.4
16	at	Central Michigan	L 70–83	-4.8	-8.2
17	at	Bowling Green	W 88–79	-12.8	+21.8
17	vs	Miami (OH)	L 67–69	-15.0	+13.0
18	vs	Ball State	L 71–74	+2.5	-5.5
18	at	Kent State	L 78–86	-14.3	+6.3

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #54 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	292 of 365	10–21	-9.36	Power
2024–25	293 of 364	12–20	-9.06	Power
2023–24	304 of 362	12–20	-9.08	Power
2022–23	320 of 363	8–23	-10.46	Power
2021–22	331 of 358	8–23	-12.37	Power
2020–21	302 of 347	5–16	-9.53	Power
2019–20	283 of 353	11–19	-18.52	MRI
2018–19	301 of 353	7–24	-31.28	MRI
2017–18	149 of 351	17–15	48.31	MRI
2016–17	158 of 351	16–16	42.12	MRI
2015–16	183 of 351	13–19	30.82	MRI
2014–15	162 of 351	20–14	38.42	MRI
2013–14	101 of 351	23–10	68.18	MRI
2012–13	128 of 347	19–12	48.54	MRI
2011–12	196 of 345	14–20	21.37	MRI
2010–11	140 of 346	21–13	49.07	MRI
2009–10	133 of 335	18–15	51.83	MRI
2008–09	264 of 330	10–21	-10.26	MRI
2007–08	98 of 328	20–12	70.53	MRI
2006–07	141 of 326	16–16	43.56	MRI
2005–06	246 of 326	14–17	-2.22	MRI
2004–05	54 of 326	20–13	95.74	MRI